Assuming it's FAM, I don't see an issue with keeping a single list, especially when existing entries come with a vid such as yours. If need be one could always check the vid and use either method or both. So I think there's no need to worry from your perspective. In recent years most players including myself also recorded/uploaded the sets and will always be able to apply both methods to their existing scores if necessary. In any case the difference in the methods should be so small that they should very rarely be decisive about a score/rank in.
Maybe we can just add new columns and use both methods for unclear cases. The suggestion being to sort new entries should be accompanied by a recording, and generally use the precise method to evaluate the score. When close to an existing score, a new entry should also state the score as determined under the traditional method. If that leads to a different rank, then I'd say we should have the "precise" method prevail, because that really is the accurate measurement. If there is no "precise" score/video of the existing score, then we could have the scores traditional method prevail if people feel strongly about it. However, those old scores are likely to be drastically improved nowadays anyway, so personally I'd say even here we can just apply the new method and go from there.
The beauty of the new run counter and its precise method is that it is tracked automatically while running. You do your runs and then immediatlely have all relevant data to make an entry, no need to review video or to rely on counting while running. It makes it a lot less time consuming to post entries, which will result in more activity for sure.
Maybe we can just add new columns and use both methods for unclear cases. The suggestion being to sort new entries should be accompanied by a recording, and generally use the precise method to evaluate the score. When close to an existing score, a new entry should also state the score as determined under the traditional method. If that leads to a different rank, then I'd say we should have the "precise" method prevail, because that really is the accurate measurement. If there is no "precise" score/video of the existing score, then we could have the scores traditional method prevail if people feel strongly about it. However, those old scores are likely to be drastically improved nowadays anyway, so personally I'd say even here we can just apply the new method and go from there.
The beauty of the new run counter and its precise method is that it is tracked automatically while running. You do your runs and then immediatlely have all relevant data to make an entry, no need to review video or to rely on counting while running. It makes it a lot less time consuming to post entries, which will result in more activity for sure.