Also, I don't believe numbers having any more vig shots.
CG was a vig (I believe him)
Somebody used a vig last night.
I have a vig shot.
I believe it to be possible that there us three different vigs in one game (believable), but that one of them has more than 1 shot is to me unthinkable.
Someone is lying about their vigilante shots. We've already had four people claim them.
If we have four mafia, they could potentially make 6 kills in two nights if the luck of the draw was with them. That is a broken mechanic.
If we have three mafia, they could still make 6 kills in two nights.
I think that is highly highly unlikely.
These two are pretty much related. Question for Fred though, what did you gain by claiming you had a vig shot available as well. I understand that you had a disbelief of CG, Numbers, and yourself all having vig shots, but did you really need to come out with it?
Question towards BA, with the complete randomization of who gets what box (essentially with all the random picking and trading) how do you even attempt to balance that? I don't see why there couldn't be more than two vig shots, because there is no guarantee that one side or the other will get them.
Overall though, do I think someone is lying? Yes, probably, either Numbers having an extra shot, CG having a shot at all, and or Fred having a shot at all.
I feel the same about numbers. I'd also add that he wanted to play follow the jcakes yesterday and Drixx ( the anti bus) is defending him hard. The only time I've seen Drixx defend someone this much is when they are mafia partners.
...snip....(ultra long post)
I think perhaps some folks are mistaking my questioning of the play as a defense of the person. I've got no idea whether Numbers is what he claims to be or not. We have yet to see him as scum, but he's a pretty smart guy and it's quite possible that he is indeed scum. The point; however, is that so far there isn't really any case against him.
I'd be much happier to lynch someone lurking or someone who actually has seemed scummy and see how Numbers' claims play out.
Once again moved Jcakes quote closer to Drixx's because I feel that its relevant. My opinion of the situation is much different. I don't think Drixx is defending Numbers because they are scum buddies. I think Drixx is defending Numbers because Numbers named Drixx as town, and if Drixx were to defend numbers tooth and nail, Numbers ends up being lynched, Drixx would be more likely to be considered townie, and I think he is jumping at the oppurtunity that Number's has presented him with. Based on all the lengthy posts I read in my skim this is what I got to and why I voted for Drixx initially. At this point in time I'm going to leave my vote there.
I believe you shot my friend.
To me, that makes you scum till the end!
Your friend as in your scum buddy?
Why would a level 3 box contain two shots and a level two box contain one and a level one contain one as well?
You can't predict who will end up with the boxes and you can't plan for balance. You can balance for balance, but you can't hope that X happens in the balance of the game, that's a broken game.
If you don't believe that everyone who has claimed a vigilante shot has one then you need to shoot one of the claimed vigilantes because one of them is lying.
As of now, I am banking on that being CG.
Balance with a game full of boxes that are picked is an impossibility. All of the crap boxes could end up with town, or mafia, or vice versa and it would be different every time. Any talk of a broken game when the abilities are distributed similar to a pick your own role game is rediculous.