Mafia Game: Cheers/Frasier Theme

[Uraj]

yesterday I said I targeted Pman last night (I.E. Night 3)

Today I said I targeted Noolde last night (I.E Night 4).

Who were your first two targets?

 

[thefranklin]

I think it is time I claimed to explain why I think we should lynch Pman with our vote 1 and frozzzen with our vote 2.

I am Dr. Lilith Sternin, a psychiatrist. I can target a person each night, if the person is anti-town their abilities will be blocked (I confirmed that if I target the person who sends in the kill, the kill will be stopped).

I targeted Pancakeman last night and we only had one death. Unfortunately I have no way of knowing if my role prevented the kill or if the doc performed a save , however I feel fairly confident (regardeless) that Pman is scum and that I may have stopped the kill last night.

So Jcakes, what part of this post is untrue? What is your lie? I know it is in there, I can smell it.

Vote 1: Jcakes

 

[thefranklin]

I have a wild theory: two mafia groups with a little twist. First of all, frozzzen and gory were in different groups (explaining frozzzens sk claim to keep the competing mafia group in the dark for the rest of the day phase). Second of all, it helps explain how we will be able to get 75% of the vote because they don't (or at least didn't) know who the other group is. Thirdly, they shared the same leader (a godfather) which explains why no mafia were nk'd. Now you ask how is this possible? The godfather is (wasn't) allowed to name names, but was able to choose or steer nks.

Now, something may have happened to combine the two groups. Or we have had a save in two consecutive nights? Seeks improbable.

All night to discuss and that is the best lie you could come up with?

Vote 2: Malevolent

 

[thefranklin]

Who were your first two targets?

Nice catch right there! A real claim would have included that information (because he could easily be nkd with a power role), and a made up claim would have easily overlooked that little detail.

 

[Jcakes1]

Nice catch right there! A real claim would have included that information (because he could easily be nkd with a power role), and a made up claim would have easily overlooked that little detail.

Nice try, but knowing who I targeted is of no value to the town. I only provide my target if there appears to have been a stopped kill. Knowing who I am targeting is of value to the mafia however, as they want to know if I am getting close.

 

[Laarz]

Sorry for my lack of attention to the game lately, if i'm still around after sunday it will improve. When I get back home tonight I will try to read through and post some votes.

 

[Gwaihir]

Nice try, but knowing who I targeted is of no value to the town. I only provide my target if there appears to have been a stopped kill. Knowing who I am targeting is of value to the mafia however, as they want to know if I am getting close.

What is it with people this game and not giving information to the town. ML didn't at first, but in the end he did. Gory on the other hand never did claim all his info, and look what he was. Sometimes the extra information can confirm someone is town or scum, are you scared to take that chance?

Anyways, we should try to use the Vote 2 again, but in any case, Mal definitely needs to go. There is NO WAY he is telling the truth in his claim. He seemed suspicious on the first couple of days but only got a pass because of a cop result. I think Jcakes makes a good vote 1 target, but Mal needs to go.


Vote 1: Jcakes
Vote 2: Malevolent

 

[coju]

Is this week still next week's last week??

This line of thinking will only get you into the 6th dimension of the nether god's funeral parlor. Don't start. Please. I beg of you.

 

[thefranklin]

Wouldn't the mafia already know if you are "getting close?" They know your last two targets. And is there some order or echelon of scum we should know about to determine how "close" you are getting?

 

[coju]

Nice try, but knowing who I targeted is of no value to the town. I only provide my target if there appears to have been a stopped kill. Knowing who I am targeting is of value to the mafia however, as they want to know if I am getting close.

I don't agree with this. Either way, who'll believe what you put anyhow? I'm more inclined, still, though, to

Vote 1: Uraj

 

[coju]

Mal, for whoever asked "why v2 mal", imo is that he needs to go. Someone already stated that the only thing keeping him alive is his 'innocent'/friend result.

any objections to v2ing mal? Please step forward.

 

[Uraj]

Your roleclaim, looks to me like it was fabricated. That combined with pcm's emphatic insistence, gets you my vote.

Vote 2: Malevolent

 

[Caluin Graye]

Jcakes: Share your targets. There's absolutely no reason to withhold them. That is, unless you're simply stalling for time to think up a believable lie.

At this point, I'm split 50/50 between Jcakes and Uraj for best lynch today. Throw in another 10% to Noodle.

For the moment, I'm going to go with Jcakes, at least until I hear what he comes up with for the first two targets.

Vote 1: Jcakes
Vote 2: Malevolent

 

[coju]

110%, doesn't that mean bullstuff?

 

[Caluin Graye]

110%, doesn't that mean bullstuff?

You're not my History teacher!

 

[Moar]

Head isn't in shape for thinking today (I blame disco bowling), so I just vote today.

Vote 1: Jcakes
Vote 2: Malevolent

 

[Jcakes1]

Fine you want to know who I targetted.

it was as follows.

N1: Malevolent
N2: Goryani
N3: Pman (only one person died)
N4: Noodle (only one person died).

I honestly think Noodle is scum, he hasn't contributed anything in 4 days, just making his usual one or two posts, yet because my role is one that is not a normal role I am in the firing line ..... It is like the previous game all over again. I am honestly getting fed up with the way these mafia games go, those of us that actually spend time hunting, reveal their roles because they believe it will help the town and actually do something get targeted. Meanwhile Noodle et al contribute NOTHING to the town and get off scott free.

Finally, if I was mafia do you think I would freely come out and reveal my role when I was under 0 pressure?
No I wouldn't, the only reason I revealed my role was because I thought it could aid the town.

Seriously here is all of Noodles 24 posts

Spoiler

Imagine my surprise!

LOL - Thyiad, nice work making Cliff the postman - very fitting.

A postman role is seldom used, but pretty cool. A postman is basically a vanilla townie, but when he dies, he goes postal, and takes someone out with him. Unless Bad Ash was chosen randomly, I assume Sathoris chose to investigate Bad Ash, and had the bad luck to be closest when the kill happened.

Nope, just cognizant that the "Vote2" mechanism makes my usual strategy unacceptably risky.

Yeah, I got the names reversed. Big deal.

How is a serial killer more likely than a postman when the freaking game mod said the person is a postman? Are you deliberately trying to confuse the town, scum?

Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2

This is spot on, except for the inconvenient facts that last game I didn't "blow up", and I wasn't scum.



You're just making stuff up now, to try to frame me. VERY suspicious.[/INDENT]

<sigh> This is why I tend to lurk. People who analyze situations and try to help the town by making sense of them are targetted.

Vote2: omgwtfbbqpwned

Vote2: omgwtfbbqpwned

I'm still catching up, guys. Busy weekend, and I really was only around the forums to clean up some spam in D3 General. I'll go over the last few pages.

I would welcome an investigation.

I disagree that it wastes an investigation when it confirms that I am a townie. It removes me from the pool of potential mafia, and hence increases the liklihood of a successful lynch.

Yes, it's always better to find scum. I'm sorry that an investigation of me wouldn't produce such a result.

Excellent tactics - well played.

Vote2: Frozzzen

Voting has been . . . laborious . . .

Vote 2:frozzzen

Son of a . . .

Vote 2: frozzzen


Pharphis, honestly I still need to go back and read several pages. I've been popping in for a minute or two here and there, but nothing that's allowed me to do more than scan a couple quick posts, and rush to place a vote. I'll admit upfront that I've allowed myself to get lazy and have become accustomed to a more relaxed vote acceptance policy that we've seen in several recent games in Community. This absolutely isn't a shot at Thy, because a strict vote acceptance polcy is both traditional and entirely within reason.

Hey, now, I've voted several times! One of them even counted!

Um . . . except that my modus operandi, game after game, is to fly below the radar. Deliberately misvoting is the polar opposite of how I play.

It seems like the voting for pancakeman has the most momentum. I don't feel strongly about him as a target, but feel that we need a lynch to bring us information. Let's see if I can do this right:

Vote 1: pancakeman

He has done 0 scum hunting, screwed up the frozzzen vote no less than three times and I blocked him last night (reulsting in only one kill). Yet you want to lynch me, one of the few remaining town power roles?

Unvote 1: Malevolent
Vote 1: Noodle
Vote 2: Malevolent

 

[Moar]

I have to think about this tomorrow.

Unvote 1: Jcakes

 

[pharphis]

I don't agree with this. Either way, who'll believe what you put anyhow? I'm more inclined, still, though, to

Vote 1: Uraj

Seconding all of this post.

Mal, for whoever asked "why v2 mal", imo is that he needs to go. Someone already stated that the only thing keeping him alive is his 'innocent'/friend result.

any objections to v2ing mal? Please step forward.

Same deal. No explanation is really necessary for why mal should get vote2. The only difference between a guilty verdict with frozzzen and this scenario is our evidence is someone who has been overhearing things since the beginning, and Mal being scummy at first and then flying by.

Fine you want to know who I targetted.

it was as follows.

N1: Malevolent
N2: Goryani
N3: Pman (only one person died)
N4: Noodle (only one person died).

I honestly think Noodle is scum, he hasn't contributed anything in 4 days, just making his usual one or two posts, yet because my role is one that is not a normal role I am in the firing line ..... It is like the previous game all over again. I am honestly getting fed up with the way these mafia games go, those of us that actually spend time hunting, reveal their roles because they believe it will help the town and actually do something get targeted. Meanwhile Noodle et al contribute NOTHING to the town and get off scott free.

Finally, if I was mafia do you think I would freely come out and reveal my role when I was under 0 pressure?
No I wouldn't, the only reason I revealed my role was because I thought it could aid the town.

Seriously here is all of Noodles 24 posts
He has done 0 scum hunting, screwed up the frozzzen vote no less than three times and I blocked him last night (reulsting in only one kill). Yet you want to lynch me, one of the few remaining town power roles?

Unvote 1: Malevolent
Vote 1: Noodle
Vote 2: Malevolent

Can't argue with that. I'm going to wait a bit before I do any re-voting though. I want to hear people's opinions on the mal vote2.

 

[thefranklin]

I am honestly getting fed up with the way these mafia games go, those of us that actually spend time hunting, reveal their roles because they believe it will help the town and actually do something get targeted.

Then why is your roleclaim false? That is why you are being targeted.

Your scummy answer about "getting close" is why I am not unvoting right now