Breaking Bad Forum Mafia Game
- Thread starter Bad Ash
- Start date
Post #234 alludes to a shared QT and it seems to belong to just the two of them.
Unable to answer this question. However, would a vote restricted person be deemed town??
I would expect to be notified. However I am usually disappointed by this planet.
No notification of what??
Lynch immunity is more commonly scum the town ability
My result on pyro has him as Todd and Neutral alignment not scum. I've only watched up to season 3 so not sure on who Todd is. Would he fit as serial killer?
- Dec 6, 2010
- 5,584
- 309
- 83
No, a vote restricted person should not be deemed town.
Todd killed a couple of people in the series, so. Hmm.. Good question.
The first one he killed in the show really threw up some red flags about his state of mind. Serial Killer, quite possibly.
[highlight]it really is a great tv series[/highlight]
Definitely. He's a cold blooded killer that shows no emotion. Him being neutral fits too since he winds up working for a lot of different people in the series.
See, Goryani demonstrates a smarty pants person post, while I demonstrate a really really ridiculously good looking person's post.
Also..
Vote: Pyrotechnician
Also..
Vote: Pyrotechnician
Ding!Ding!
Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!
Rule number 19: You are under absolutely no circumstances allowed to quote from other games/threads.
Rule 20: You are not allowed to try to circumvent the rules, this is at the discretion of the moderator(s)
Rule 21: Any attempt to cheat at the game will be ruled with an iron fist.
These are rules I hope every one of us adapt for their own game. They were not in place before. And unwritten rules apprently are to be challenged. Please abide by these from here on out for at least this game. SMH.
Rule 20: You are not allowed to try to circumvent the rules, this is at the discretion of the moderator(s)
Rule 21: Any attempt to cheat at the game will be ruled with an iron fist.
These are rules I hope every one of us adapt for their own game. They were not in place before. And unwritten rules apprently are to be challenged. Please abide by these from here on out for at least this game. SMH.
I will just try to reiterate the actions so far:
1) Night 1 we had 2 kills, which could mean any dual combo of scum-factions, SKs or similar.
2) Day 2 we had two players vote blocked (Noodle's no-vote + FoE dingified).
3) Day 2 lynch of coju failed.
4) Night 2 we had 1 kill, which per 1) suggests a block/one-shot SK/CG being a scum faction or SK/any other BA'ish scenario.
5) Day 3 we have 1 player vote blocked (CDM's no-vote + Gory dingified can apparently vote).
By all indications we have lost at least 4 townies, and could potentially have lost as many as 6.
That combined with a lynch being countered by some action, puts town on the defense imo.
We may safely assume that scum have a significant influence; especially if the vote-blocked player is a townie.
In the worst case scenario we have 6 dead townies and 1 blocked townie. That leaves 11 votes with an intact scum faction.
With 6 votes required for a lynch, we have to be very careful with our votes today.
And then the rush for voting a lynch of Pyro - after a D2 concensus on coju. I am very suspicious!
@flub: why do you choose to take JCakes word over that of Pyro?
I could ask the same of Goryani, but will most likely just get a dingish answer.
They were clearly never gonna result in lynches and seem to me to be some sort of "I told you so.." votes for D3.
I prefer votes to have a base in posts or actions instead of being based on gut-feeling.
I can safely admit though, that one of the players I usually suspect is you. You are what I would call a flow-breaker.
Votes out of the blue; referring posts many pages from the current etc.
Something can be discussed in thread and you will not participate even while posting. Then several pages later you will
revisit the topic and begin commenting. I do not like that playstyle at all.
I am curious about this as well - the only ones willing to save coju would be:
1) coju himself
2) scum buddies assuming coju is scum
3) townie buddies that have investigated coju and found him to be town.
For various reasons, option 3 is unlikely though (even for a BA game).
There is ofc the option that the lynch was prevented as a night action not knowing who it would target.
I must confess I still believe, still believe that cujo is the best scum-bet though.
Well apparently you are.
This surprised me, since FoE didn't vote D1.
1) Night 1 we had 2 kills, which could mean any dual combo of scum-factions, SKs or similar.
2) Day 2 we had two players vote blocked (Noodle's no-vote + FoE dingified).
3) Day 2 lynch of coju failed.
4) Night 2 we had 1 kill, which per 1) suggests a block/one-shot SK/CG being a scum faction or SK/any other BA'ish scenario.
5) Day 3 we have 1 player vote blocked (CDM's no-vote + Gory dingified can apparently vote).
By all indications we have lost at least 4 townies, and could potentially have lost as many as 6.
That combined with a lynch being countered by some action, puts town on the defense imo.
We may safely assume that scum have a significant influence; especially if the vote-blocked player is a townie.
In the worst case scenario we have 6 dead townies and 1 blocked townie. That leaves 11 votes with an intact scum faction.
With 6 votes required for a lynch, we have to be very careful with our votes today.
And then the rush for voting a lynch of Pyro - after a D2 concensus on coju. I am very suspicious!
@flub: why do you choose to take JCakes word over that of Pyro?
I could ask the same of Goryani, but will most likely just get a dingish answer.
These two posts by Gory D2 from 2.5 hours respectively 2 hours before day end made me very suspicious.
They were clearly never gonna result in lynches and seem to me to be some sort of "I told you so.." votes for D3.
I agree that the wording of my post was poor; I however find the meaning to be quite clear.
I prefer votes to have a base in posts or actions instead of being based on gut-feeling.
Well if I were to name them, I would contradict my own post, wouldn't I?
I can safely admit though, that one of the players I usually suspect is you. You are what I would call a flow-breaker.
Votes out of the blue; referring posts many pages from the current etc.
Something can be discussed in thread and you will not participate even while posting. Then several pages later you will
revisit the topic and begin commenting. I do not like that playstyle at all.
I am curious about this as well - the only ones willing to save coju would be:
1) coju himself
2) scum buddies assuming coju is scum
3) townie buddies that have investigated coju and found him to be town.
For various reasons, option 3 is unlikely though (even for a BA game).
There is ofc the option that the lynch was prevented as a night action not knowing who it would target.
I must confess I still believe, still believe that cujo is the best scum-bet though.
Well apparently you are.
This surprised me, since FoE didn't vote D1.
Because I do not think Jcakes has the testicular fortitude to launch such a bold maneuver without just cause.
Also Pyrotechnician is a proven lying liar lie face with flame pants....I'm just sayin'
I share that sentiment based on my (granted limited) knowledge
...but what if some scum partner(s) has(ve) whispered in JCakes' ears?
Guess what I'm asking is: "is this a case of, I've made up my mind, don't need to think it over"?
Like I said in my previous post, I don't feel like we have a lot of room for error here. If we do lynch Pyro and he turns out to be town, I think we're pretty much screwed; at least in the worst case scenario. And the fact that Pyro has 3 votes so very early D3 after a day with a failed lynch of coju just dosen't sit well with me. If it had been after a debate and people had more or less agreed that his claim was false, it would've been a different story. I agree that the JCakes early post was convincing, but it got picked up really really fast.
I'm confused atm. Will follow the thread to see what unfolds.
I do not see the situation as quite so dire. The true alignment of Sathoris and Drixx is unknown. One or both could have been scum on opposing factions; unlikely but possible.
To run around hollering the sky is falling seems unwarranted, unless....
To run around hollering the sky is falling seems unwarranted, unless....
Google