Happy birthday!
Jerome Bettis is a nfl football player who's nickname was the bus. So it started being used after phar bussed his own mafia teammate when there was no pressure on them to gain town cred.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Zombies invade Atlantis. Stargate zombie Mafia game.
- Thread starter ThunderCat
- Start date
Happy birthday!
Jerome Bettis is a nfl football player who's nickname was the bus. So it started being used after phar bussed his own mafia teammate when there was no pressure on them to gain town cred.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
It was TC's (last?) game! He should remember
Ok, now to actually go back and quote while I've got like 30 mins
I remember the event, I just didn't know you folk referred to pharphis as Jerome. Now I do and I know why.
Remind me the circumstances and my accusations, please. I don't disbelieve you but I don't have any idea what this would have or could have been.
Let me answer the "contradiction" thing here, I think several people agreed with you. . .
It wasn't a contradiction at all. I had a lot of thoughts/answers in a single post because I was gone for the day. Because I was on a timeline I posted my "contradictory" reason for voting Antswers at the end. My response to BPC had nothing to do with what actual reason I gave, it had to do with BPC's assumption/statement that I thought he should vote with me. I said no such thing and wanted to point that out. I explained that he should vote Antswers if he thinks I actually have something on him or if he thinks Antswers is scummy. Pretty straightforward.
I gave myself a timeline. I didn't expect Kegs to completely not answer why he voted but I suspect (or maybe I read this?) that he wanted me to post my reason first since I put more emphasis on it.
This is convenient, thanks!
Like some have said (flubb?) people are looking way too much into my vote being the second one on Antswers. I can't help that kegs voted first.
This is also true. People can go back and see how I interacted with BPC and Phillinnicus when they joined as well as how they interacted with me.
I explained why in post 181. Without giving me time to give my reason she voted me and claimed I never intended on giving my reason for voting Antswers.
Do you think kegs and I are a team?
Do you think I would have said anything different had kegs said he had evidence against Antswers?
Last minute?
What makes my claim of having evidence fundamentally any different than Sathoris heavily implying he has evidence ("What's your name?" then ignores everyone's questions to him regarding it until much later.)
At least I take that has heavy implication of a PR investigative result. Do you?
I've said this a few times and I'll say it again. I had no evidence to believe kegs was scum in that game (since I was) and so I assumed he was SK. All I did in that D1 was say that people should at least wait until he says something (it was a party host result that condemned him and he was nearly locked by the time he posted) and people freaked out and said I was his scum buddy. This is in no way comparable to that game, unless you think there are two mafia factions?
Your second point is more valid since yes that is typically my behaviour as mafia
He would have mine,too. Btw the second link you gave is just a quote from the room. He seems to still be having fun this day phase.
Additionally he never Antswered your question...
I loved that PGO claim. Good times! Also true, I play riskier as mafia.
aw
Lots of catching up to do, so excuse the more quotes crap.
Good old flubb, back to his normal self.
Interesting that you question why both CG/Goryani are alive in your random thoughts section, I know they are prefered N1 targets due to their skillz and all, but the majority of your post focuses on phar/kegs, seems like your just adding them on there for the fun of it to create doubt for later. And taking my point about you calling out Gory every game? Did you only think of that after you read my post?
No idea, I was on I-70 for a long time, but through other states, and no tolls in those states.
The contradictions, they are everywhere! No reason to bring up things others have already said, but the sentence urging someone to vote for them if they believe you have strong evidence and then saying you don't have any evidence in the same post just amuses me to no end.
My vote on Drixx was for a reason, both Gory and Sath had voted for drixx, and after both votes there was a reaction from drixx regarding the vote taking place. I wanted to see if the reactions would continue with more votes or if he would disregard it.
The more interesting thing is that you both had nothing, and that you both decided to pursue AAA. While this development is interesting, I would also find it highly unlikely for two scum to pull the same exact move on the same day, its way too risky, and pointless. Therefore based on that I can only come to the likely conclusion that either only one of you is scum or you are both townies picking on the newbie. For what reason doesn't seem to be too clear right now but maybe you two can enlighten me on that. Why not throw a random vote on a veteran "with evidence"? Were you hoping to get something better from a more inexperienced player?
Good old flubb, back to his normal self.
I find this very strange. Spamstegs posting a vote message and then just "No ." one of those "No . " beeing in answer to a question about post restriction. This is not something that scum would do. Too much attention. I'd guess he has a post restriction and is not allowed to tell.
I am more interested in pharphis. He supported kestegs in his vote and said he had a reason. Which he would give later. Usually people saying that seldomly give their reason. Fine with me if you don't want to give your reason, but then don't say you will give your reason. Also pharphis singled me out in twilight for my Gory vote post. Come on. I say about every game that something is off with Gory and it was twilight!. That chicken paragraph was seriously weird though.
I don't find Noodle explaining his joke with Bad Ash to a newcomer suspicious. It is just being helpful to a newbie. Well done I think.
Why is CG alive?
Why is Gory alive?
Zokar can be a PITA also, but he always drew a lot of town attention, so I don't really get why he was killed.
/end random thoughts
(Yes, I am a bit on the drunk side. Just at the point where you will manage to perform at work the next day.
Vote: pharphis
Interesting that you question why both CG/Goryani are alive in your random thoughts section, I know they are prefered N1 targets due to their skillz and all, but the majority of your post focuses on phar/kegs, seems like your just adding them on there for the fun of it to create doubt for later. And taking my point about you calling out Gory every game? Did you only think of that after you read my post?
No idea, I was on I-70 for a long time, but through other states, and no tolls in those states.
The contradictions, they are everywhere! No reason to bring up things others have already said, but the sentence urging someone to vote for them if they believe you have strong evidence and then saying you don't have any evidence in the same post just amuses me to no end.
My vote on Drixx was for a reason, both Gory and Sath had voted for drixx, and after both votes there was a reaction from drixx regarding the vote taking place. I wanted to see if the reactions would continue with more votes or if he would disregard it.
The more interesting thing is that you both had nothing, and that you both decided to pursue AAA. While this development is interesting, I would also find it highly unlikely for two scum to pull the same exact move on the same day, its way too risky, and pointless. Therefore based on that I can only come to the likely conclusion that either only one of you is scum or you are both townies picking on the newbie. For what reason doesn't seem to be too clear right now but maybe you two can enlighten me on that. Why not throw a random vote on a veteran "with evidence"? Were you hoping to get something better from a more inexperienced player?
Convincing you to use your vote2 on someone seems fairly pointless if that person is not a likely lynch canidate since the vote 2 is just another vote and not a 2nd lynch type mechanic. It should be treated just like any other double vote power and used to secure a lynch if necessary. On day 1 I would actually be inclined to not use the vote because early voting records are helpful later in the game, and using the vote 2 leaves one less vote to be analyzed later on.
It definately wasn't 35 mph, but there were multiple stops with my daughter in the car. Babies are so difficult.
Apparently you can't change flavors Gory, no Chocolate, Vanilla and Strawberry for you!
I thought it was in relation to being close to their home state, but only dj can tell us what he meant. CG and Drixx apparently want to be helpful though?
The one that Gwaihir apparently thinks there is? Tell me Gwiahir, why would you think a post restriction would be related to a zombie mechanic? Are you a zombie, and that is why you know about zombie mechanics?
Also, is it weird that no one has brought up the topic of some roles being zombies yet, or is that just assumed in a game like this?
I could throw out that possibility too, but I always thought that was just assumed every game. If one of you aren't dead by day 3, I usually know something is up.
What a strange post, maybe kegs and phar were right and we should have you in the cross-hairs. Are you going to make an arguement against phar or just let others do it for you?
And apparently Drixx agrees with you to? (If I remember reading right?) Are you more scared now?
Noodle is back to normal too! Yay, how exciting! But not.
Because bambie can't answer for himself? Unsure, maybe dj would like to tell us why CG/Drixx are jumping up for him, but then again my initial thought when Goryani posed the question was similar.
Reasoning explained somewhere above, I didn't expect the vote to stay there since it was early in the fisrt day phase, but figured I'd try to get something out of it.
You have a second vote, why don't you use it? Oh right, try to convince you. He does seem to be letting others do the work for him, but then again a lot of people have jumped at the kegs/phar interaction.
Part of me says your still mad because you were the one he mega bussed in that game, but part of me says you are right.
Just in case you missed it AAA, could you answer the question of what you meant in this post?
No idea on the possibility of any zombie mechanics. kegs specifically said that he was not post restricted (in a kinda maybe way) so I actually wondered if he was holding out to hear what phar would say. I was curious how he would react if his posting method got related to him being mafia. He didn't break character until he got his response from phar, while I expected an immediate jump if he was mafia, so I am leaning towards him being town.
This. I find Drixx's more odd, and I thought the same thing as CG and wanted to correct it as well
Lost a question from Gory at some point, but I still remember it: Why did I not point out Gory/CG could be scum for not dying N1?
Because it was already implied that that was the reason by Moar. I gave the alternative I saw as just as likely.
No idea on the possibility of any zombie mechanics. kegs specifically said that he was not post restricted (in a kinda maybe way) so I actually wondered if he was holding out to hear what phar would say. I was curious how he would react if his posting method got related to him being mafia. He didn't break character until he got his response from phar, while I expected an immediate jump if he was mafia, so I am leaning towards him being town.
This. I find Drixx's more odd, and I thought the same thing as CG and wanted to correct it as well
Lost a question from Gory at some point, but I still remember it: Why did I not point out Gory/CG could be scum for not dying N1?
Because it was already implied that that was the reason by Moar. I gave the alternative I saw as just as likely.
- Apr 8, 2006
- 3,629
- 4
- 3
This. I find Drixx's more odd, and I thought the same thing as CG and wanted to correct it as well
Honestly it was just what struck me as the likely reason for DJ's comment. I just thought it was answering a fairly mundane question and putting it to rest, but CG's suggestion makes more sense. Why is it odd for CG and I to want to answer a general and fairly mundane question? It didn't seem like a game oriented question to me.
Did you guys see it as a game related question?
I wouldn't normally answer this, but it's getting close to day end. He's referencing a movie and a sort of inside joke him and Phar have.
Everything he's posted thus far has been in that category of directing his posts at Phar, through inside jokes and what not. What I am seeing is a new player sticking close by one of the few people he knows in the game.
Scared? No.
Concerned? I'm always that - he doesn't need to agree with me for that to be true.
Noted: Jcakes does not like when people answer off-topic questions about other people.
Well, yes...because how can I expect AAA to defend themselves without seeing any evidence of why others are voting for them?
I apologize for questioning the reason behind some votes that were already explained, I must have simply failed to quote those posts as I read through so I didn't recall them occurring.
I find the 2nd vote pharphis put on AAA to be weird, but I don't think it's enough cause to vote him. The spectacular target he's made of himself makes it seem like a very poor move, and I don't think he'd be unaware of that particular consequence of the play he made.
Yeah, BPC is right. I've quoted The Room and Stargate: Atlantis so far. Just riding stuff out monitoring the board to get a sense of things. Pharphis has raised the most suspicion so I voted against him. Plus yeah, I know him so a lynch would be funny.
Agreed! But maybe a little later. Right now I'm only sold on my first intuition, Noodle.
Probably too late but I think Sath should get the second vote. Role fishing
that or Moar. I'm equally fine with lynching either of them
Scratch that, I'm also good with a Noodle lynch. He was off-character to start and there have been some connections made to him. He's going to look scummy for the entire game which makes things harder in the end, anyway.
Unvote: Moar
Vote: Noodle
I think I might change my policy from now on to "lynch a (lurker) non-contributor on D1"
Google