BipolarChemist
New member
- Jan 26, 2013
- 3,062
- 0
- 0
I like this policy!I think I might change my policy from now on to "lynch a (lurker) non-contributor on D1"
I like this policy!I think I might change my policy from now on to "lynch a (lurker) non-contributor on D1"
Scratch that, I'm also good with a Noodle lynch. He was off-character to start and there have been some connections made to him. He's going to look scummy for the entire game which makes things harder in the end, anyway.
Unvote: Moar
Vote: Noodle
I think I might change my policy from now on to "lynch a (lurker) non-contributor on D1"
I don't have conclusive evidence, i just think you're the best bet since no one is interested in Moar or Sathoris and you've played a bit more defensively this game than what I'm (and others) familiar with.Don't do things halfway - you should also claim to have some very conclusive evidence that I'm scum. Which I'm not.
Not that. I was fine with that and I may have said so in the thread. I don't remember"A bit more defensively"? I explained the situation with Bad Ash and I to someone who had never witnessed it before. If I was playing defensively, I probably would have responded to Bipolarchemist's voting for me instead of ignoring it like I have. I think your definition of "defensively" doesn't coincide with the dictionary's.
lolThat sounds mighty defensive.
Did you notice that Noodle started doing that several days ago in various threads unrelated to this game?
Eh, going back and finding your posts there was less than I thought there was. Obviously it felt off to me and still does, though. Not used to seeing effort being put into something like thishttp://www.purediablo.com/forums/sh...s-and-awards&p=8563144&highlight=#post8563144 , for example, back on September 26. And in the sign up thread for this game. So, nothing role related. Just me having fun.
Oops, I forgot to ask how I singled you out in twilight when you mentioned it. Was it when I asked you what you thought was scummier about Gory than normal?Pharphis:
I voted him for two reasons. The first one was his "I got evidence and I'm telling later." He hadn't come up with it yet before my bedtime. So I expressed my opinion with a vote since I knew I wouldn't be around til about now. This part of my vote was not based on him as a person, but on general experience. I'd have voted for anyone doing that. The 2nd reason is based on his gameplay and that is the way he singled me out in twilight. Last game I played with him and he was town, he was acting comletely different. He was more balanced and trying to reason, not playing agressively. He kind of looked at arguments from both sides. The playstyle he has this game I associate with him being mafia. None of the post he made since I went to bed last night convince me that he is town.
Noodle:
He is posting far more than he usually does. Most is BS just like normal though. The post standing out is him explaining something to a newcomer. I still don't see that as a bad thing. I don't get a scum vibe of him, but then I usually never get a vibe of him since he's so lurky. I don't see a reason to lynch him today, but I will vote for him before a no lynch.
Gory:
Way to go with a good power you got. Instead of scumhunting yourself you just sit back and ask others to convince you. Sure, I get it, that's a way of scumhunting also. But saying that outright will make any scum not try to convince you too much and slip. In the end you'll use your own reasoning anyway. You'd not be Gory if you wouldn't. Unless you are scum Gory. Then you'd just try to get the most townie points. I'd vote you, but not today. The chance of lynching a townie on D1 is too high to risk the voting advantage if it is in town hands.
AAA:
Don't know him yet, so can't read him. I won't vote for him.
Drixx:
First game I don't think he's scum, so he probably is. Won't vote him either today though.
Rest of the field:
Ain't got no clue.
Wait a sec, are you suggesting you like to post?Clarifying fact: I'm taking some time off work at the moment, and have a lot more free time than usual. By "taking some time off work" I mean that my position was eliminated, and I was given a year's pay as severance. By "a lot more free time" I mean "nearly infinite free time." Didn't think it was pertinent, but it seems not having to steal a few moments here and there throughout the day has rendered me more able to regularly post.
I'm with Bad Ash. I hate this because it makes me laugh.Did someone say my name? I'm here, I'm here!
Hey I'm town too!!! We could be sisters.Don't do things halfway - you should also claim to have some very conclusive evidence that I'm scum. Which I'm not.
So you're Jesse Pinkman....Clarifying fact: I'm taking some time off work at the moment, and have a lot more free time than usual. By "taking some time off work" I mean that my position was eliminated, and I was given a year's pay as severance. By "a lot more free time" I mean "nearly infinite free time." Didn't think it was pertinent, but it seems not having to steal a few moments here and there throughout the day has rendered me more able to regularly post.
Yes.Oops, I forgot to ask how I singled you out in twilight when you mentioned it. Was it when I asked you what you thought was scummier about Gory than normal?
Here you are doing it again. With Noodle this time. Why are you only asking him? Aren't there plenty others who you'd like to know a scum/town list from in case they die?Wait a sec, are you suggesting you like to post?
Noodle, why don't you give us a short list of who you find scummy/townie? For someone who has some votes on him you've yet to put in any of your newly-available effort into making sure your voice is heard in case you're lynched or NKed
Because he's a lynch candidate and he isn't behaving like he wants people to know his readsYes.
Here you are doing it again. With Noodle this time. Why are you only asking him? Aren't there plenty others who you'd like to know a scum/town list from in case they die?
Of course you have no strong reads. Why would I even ask. And then the vanilla claim at the end. Seems like someone is trying hard not to reveal any info or be lynchedPharphis, no one strikes me as being quite scummy or pro-town at the moment. Your false claim of having information on AAA was suspicious, but without additional shenanigans I'm inclined to consider it merely reckless at this point. I rarely have strong feelings about people this early in the game, unless I have some sort of power role that gives me info. I don't, in this game.
Of course you have no strong reads. Why would I even ask.
And then the vanilla claim at the end. Seems like someone is trying hard not to reveal any info or be lynched
Honestly it was just what struck me as the likely reason for DJ's comment. I just thought it was answering a fairly mundane question and putting it to rest, but CG's suggestion makes more sense. Why is it odd for CG and I to want to answer a general and fairly mundane question? It didn't seem like a game oriented question to me.
Did you guys see it as a game related question?
I wouldn't normally answer this, but it's getting close to day end. He's referencing a movie and a sort of inside joke him and Phar have.
Everything he's posted thus far has been in that category of directing his posts at Phar, through inside jokes and what not. What I am seeing is a new player sticking close by one of the few people he knows in the game.
Yeah, BPC is right. I've quoted The Room and Stargate: Atlantis so far. Just riding stuff out monitoring the board to get a sense of things. Pharphis has raised the most suspicion so I voted against him. Plus yeah, I know him so a lynch would be funny.
And then the vanilla claim at the end.