[OT]Dueling game test
- Thread starter ThunderCat
- Start date
That's basically it.
I've decided that everyone is allowed to communicate outside of the thread. My only (optional) request is that you use QTs and I get links so I can enjoy the chat.
Also, I'm open to debates here. Should armour have 2-5 or 2-7? Or something else?
Don't let the high vowel count names unite! Don't succomb to communism! I'm sure that's what it means.
My original announcment of welcoming a 5 man alliance to take out the big three still stands. BPC offer is nice, but we all know the randomness can soon cause havock per these duels. Let us take down the mighty vowel kings!
My original announcment of welcoming a 5 man alliance to take out the big three still stands. BPC offer is nice, but we all know the randomness can soon cause havock per these duels. Let us take down the mighty vowel kings!
It's all statistics! The higher our initiative, the more likely we are to attack. If we attack more often, when you have no defence, we will win.
Of course we could get very unlucky, but that's also unlikely.
Of course we could get very unlucky, but that's also unlikely.
What's the point of attacking more often if you can barely deal any damage?
Initiative is not the most important stat.
Initiative is not the most important stat.
No, but with the 4 person team I proposed, we would control half of all of the Attacking points, as well as all of the defence and 5/7 of all initiative points.
In the alliance of five we can use three people each day and then have the other two duel it out so whoever is last standing in the four all have armor.
Don't forget someone has to vote for the opponent. Yes indeed.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Don't forget someone has to vote for the opponent. Yes indeed.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Without verbal commitment on a weak player alliance I suggest we use our votes to put two strong players against each other
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Korial, Gory and Numbers: If you want an almost guaranteed straight shot to the Top 4, then you should join my alliance. This will allow for all of use to have armor, where we will all be able to duke it out fairly.
I was really surprised no one had voted yet. And then I realized the day ends tomorrow, not 1.5 hours ago. Oops.
Someone wants to work with me! I am willing to take whatever I can get!
Again with the misreading! 2-7 of each is just crazy, as that gives 6-21 (2-5 is still 6-15) stats and each vote is worth at most 5. I would say armor should probably not be worth more than 2 good votes, so make it top out at 10 total 1-3 of each, or maybe 4-10 randomly distributed stats.
I regret jumping the gun.
Someone wants to work with me! I am willing to take whatever I can get!
Again with the misreading! 2-7 of each is just crazy, as that gives 6-21 (2-5 is still 6-15) stats and each vote is worth at most 5. I would say armor should probably not be worth more than 2 good votes, so make it top out at 10 total 1-3 of each, or maybe 4-10 randomly distributed stats.
I regret jumping the gun.
It is actually pretty balanced between the three stats I think. What happens if the two sides are not physically capable of killing each other off (seems unlikely, but theoretically)?
Anyone not on this list wait for them to choose their champion and vote someone from the same group in against him.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Well this is a free for all, but I guess some co-operation is required to make it through to end game.
I'm down.
And yea sure I don't mind taking the first fight.
Google