Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread
I need to use less of the subjunctive tense >.> Anyhow, here's a repost with a more concise meaning than the vague statements in the last one.
Ok, here's my results after scanning through the posting history thus far.
Starting with Noodle.
The fact he doesn't post much worries me. Considering day 1, I've counted a total of 6 posts, most of which are short and don't offer any form of insight.
I will say that I assume Valhouros is clean. He broke the code of flubby's post restriction, and making more information public to the town is never in scum's best interest.
That is actually a little insignificant the way I see it. Considering it is day one, there is little information that could be gained from cracking the post restriction on day one. It's nice that we were able to understand Valhouros but the restriction changed the day after, and we still don't know who exactly controls it, we only have a theory.
I'd be willing to throw a vote on coju, if there was some momentum. Just seems to be a bit reckless, which worries me.
You say you are willing to throw a reckless vote and that it worries you.
[3 posts later]
OK, Drixx.
vote: coju
but you do it anyway around 3 posts later. If you're against, why would you vote? And it's not like it was that big of a bandwagon anyway (only 3 people). Even then, at the time, zemaj and drixx were much better targets.
So day 1 wasn't the best we've seen anyway. Fine. Let's move on to day 2
Still trying to make sense of things, kestegs. I agree with others that Drixx has verged on contradicting himself, so I wouldn't be against a lynch there. Ankeli I find difficult to take real seriously in these games, as he's basically a rabid dog. He'll target anyone he sees, for no apparent reason.
Wasn't it Ankeli who poked zemaj and got him on the skewer in the first place? Sounds like you're trying to discredit him, making the attack less significant imo.
I would caution against locking a lynch too soon - we have plenty of time to play with, and locking a lynch prematurely limits our flexibility to change if zemaj or whoever the target is comes in with a seemingly valid explanation, or if someone else makes a gaffe and inadvertently drops evidence that he / she is scum.
It's hard to get voting to stop just before the locking vote, since it's only 1 vote away from the lynching one. In that case, we would have to be well before it. Idk what to think of it now, it seems more innocent now that I read it, but when I quoted this I had the feeling it was attempt to stall the vote a little so, you can ignore this one if you are so inclined.
I'm going to be in and out of meetings all day, so I'll cast my vote now. I feel there have been enough opportunities for zemaj to defend himself.
vote: zemaj
And so a policy vote to merge in with the town's bandwagon.
And then, on Day 3, Uraj apparently tries to frame Noodle for not voting against Zemaj (or that's what Noodle deciphers), which he revokes by saying he obviously did (i don't feel like looking up the posts, look them up in the search) trying to make Uraj sound like scum.
Now, I see Noodle is at least attempting to make his posts more content, but for the time being
Vote: Noodle
I don't have much time to traverse the rest of folks on my list so this is all I post for now (I figure the sooner the better). If anyone finds discrepancies in my post, I'll gladly hear them. For now, that's where I stand.