Laarz was following along with the misguided train of thought that you were trying to guide everyone along. Now that people have noticed you're acting strangely and either lying or being purposefully vague you've changed your tactics a bit and provided more information. My question was, why have you been putting out these mysterious statements and what trap are you trying to set?
You say that you're trying to manipulate scum into making wrong moves but it seems instead that you're just trying to find anybody to pin attention on if suspicion starts to build against one of your partners or, as we just saw, if suspicion starts to build against you. You only voted against me once people started to feel your behaviour was too damning to go unnoticed. Further, you're trying really hard to convince people of things and to get people to talk about the topics you want and I don't know why. I feel that all of this is a pretty clear justification for my curiosity. I wasn't accusatory in any of my posts, I objectively asked for more information.
You make the claim that asking for clarification is a scum move but I don't understand why that would be so. Your statements are suspect and warrant investigation. I don't know if your version of the truth is real or if you are trying to create a perspective in the group which supports you and your cohorts. In any case, I find it very off-putting that you would be so defensive about the unclear posts you've been making that you would vote for a lynch against me in response to me asking for clarification.