Zombies invade Atlantis. Stargate zombie Mafia game.
- Thread starter ThunderCat
- Start date
I was going to remove my vote because it was more intended as pressure but then I found myself saying "I still think it was a slip though" so not sure why I would unvote at this point in time.
Yes it is the only one so far from SG:U. I am not sure what to think of it to be honest. I kind of expected a lot of atlantis characters, but so far noone has been revealed as a character from Atlantis.
Revealed
Pharphis: Martouf (SG1)
Pyro: Nerus (SG1)
Claimed
Noodle: Adria (SG1)
Korial: Harlan (SG1 - appears to be mod confirmed from story)
BPC - Maybourne (SG1)
Numbers - Ronald Greer (SGU)
CG - Siler (SG1)
Some of these guys do appear in other series (Siler for example has a cameo in SG: Atlantis for 2 episodes). I am going of memory so not sure if I missed any claims.
I can kind of see the slip, but it feels flimsy.
Also it was numbers that claimed greer not Ant ..... I don't think Ant's claimed yet
- Apr 8, 2006
- 3,629
- 4
- 3
Yes numbers claimed town vigilante (x-shot), can only shoot at night, cannot vote the next day. It doesn't make an awful lot of sense but neither does Noodle being lynched and us not getting a flip and neither does 2 kill attempts that both failed last night. Numbers voted and it counted, so the 2 kill attempts seems to confirm that the is almost certainly 2 anti-town factions.
Apparently the doc saved CG (and made him more powerful, so he says) and someone else got turned into a robot.
Apparently the doc saved CG (and made him more powerful, so he says) and someone else got turned into a robot.
I think it's more of a slip than flub (or whoever it was last day phase) saying gory was pro-town without any hard info saying so. Someone thinking the person who was just lynched, who had a non-revealing lynch, which android robot parts and weird mechanics coming into play thinking they were still alive...pretty weird.
The story seems to disagree with that CG, story says Siler got pretty injured last night but the doc fixed him up or something to that effect.
Thanks flubster, lurktaculer another fine word I can add to my collection:wink:
I dont think I have ever seen CG slip in a mafia game.
Totally agree! But why would he A. think Noodle avoided the lynch and B. Not comment on this when talking about Noodle directly?
- Apr 8, 2006
- 3,629
- 4
- 3
A positive effect in addition to being saved equates to you being more powerful. Role and protection is power in mafia.
No, the story says I had injuries. I've been accumulating injuries since the beginning of the game. Take a look at my first post on Day One and Day Two. The Doctor, by protecting me, clears up my injuries.
None of that requires someone trying to night kill me.
This is quite simply not true. You're applying your own incorrect assumptions and coming up with wrong answers.
I sped read the end of day post, and usually no flip = lynch evasion. Especially in TC games.
... what? I don't know what you mean by this.
So you say now but why wouldn't you just state that before when I asked? And is this the atypical benefits you mentioned or do those come in some other form? You're making vague claims and then you voted for a lynch against me when I asked you to elaborate.
You're creating confusion and, to some extent, creating opportunities for wrongful assumptions. I don't know if this behaviour is scum, neutral, or town. What I do know however, is that it's strange, and once again I'd like to ask, what's the deal? What game are you playing?
I have absolutely no idea why there "may" have been two kills last night. Based on the story there appeared to be a doctor save, but I think korial will have to enlighten us on whether or not the android thing actually means there was another kill averted as well. The only reason I voted on Pyro's train was specifically to see what peoples answers were to certain questions I posed at the time, as well as seeing if the fact that my vote didn't count was noticed. There was absolutely no reason for me to vote on that train and "out" myself, as you put it, were I scum. That would have been a terrible decision in every way. Vig is also a terrible way to explain my inability to vote. A lie about being targeted by some other role would have been a much better idea, and basically unverifiable. Instead, I created a situation where I had to prove who I was to everyone else. Sounds like the worst fake claim ever. With the information you have right now, there were two kills on N2, with me unable to vote on D2, then one kill on N3, with me able to vote D3, and then no kills, but possibly two attempts, N4, with me again able to vote D4. Either I was targeted by another role/used an ability unrelated to the extra kill on N2 which cost me my vote the next day, and haven't used it since, or everything about my role and power are as I stated/I was only targeted by this vote losing ability on N2.
Let's look at those scenarios assuming I'm scum: Were I targeted by this mystery role, were they town, upon seeing me using my "fake" claim to avoid suspicion, they could confirm what they did, and have thus cemented my lynch yesterday instead of noodles. That didn't happen. If the person targeting me was a scum partner of my own, a number of questions are raised. Why haven't they used this power on anybody else? Why did they use it on me?Why did I make it obvious that I was unable to vote by trying to vote on a guaranteed train?
I apologize for all of that, and what is almost certainly a case of what I would consider someone trying too hard to avoid suspicion, but once I started thinking about the ramifications of a situation where my vig powers are a fake claim, it looked more and more ridiculous to me.
You and I agree on how questionable BPC is. That's good. It's actually the only reason I'm not switching my vote to you right now.
Resurrections have happened in these games, but I don't think they're common or smiled upon based upon reaction of the players during the game I was part of in which they happened. Noodle could have very well have been a scum power role with a variant of godfather that only investigated as neutral instead of town, but also jumps to other members of their faction once they've been killed. That seems at least plausible.
Kestegs
New member
- Aug 27, 2008
- 49,770
- 12
- 3
Okay, that kinda clears it up. I don't really see it myself, but if Noodle were to return to play that would change things.
Kestegs
New member
- Aug 27, 2008
- 49,770
- 12
- 3
That's interesting. My character is also based out of sg-1 as far as I can tell.
Right, that's what I meant.
Numbers still could have killed someone. We can't really trust anything he's said.
Laarz didn't ask me a question. He pointed out what he thought was an inconsistency and then said what his own interpretation was. You, on the other hand, asked me direct questions pertaining to my role and powers. That's the difference between a townie and a scum.
If I just give all the answers to everyone right away, then I get nothing in return. No reads on players, no discussion, no chance to manipulate scum into making wrong moves. That's how I play.
... Zombies invade Atlantis Mafia? I feel like this is a trick question.
Laarz was following along with the misguided train of thought that you were trying to guide everyone along. Now that people have noticed you're acting strangely and either lying or being purposefully vague you've changed your tactics a bit and provided more information. My question was, why have you been putting out these mysterious statements and what trap are you trying to set?
You say that you're trying to manipulate scum into making wrong moves but it seems instead that you're just trying to find anybody to pin attention on if suspicion starts to build against one of your partners or, as we just saw, if suspicion starts to build against you. You only voted against me once people started to feel your behaviour was too damning to go unnoticed. Further, you're trying really hard to convince people of things and to get people to talk about the topics you want and I don't know why. I feel that all of this is a pretty clear justification for my curiosity. I wasn't accusatory in any of my posts, I objectively asked for more information.
You make the claim that asking for clarification is a scum move but I don't understand why that would be so. Your statements are suspect and warrant investigation. I don't know if your version of the truth is real or if you are trying to create a perspective in the group which supports you and your cohorts. In any case, I find it very off-putting that you would be so defensive about the unclear posts you've been making that you would vote for a lynch against me in response to me asking for clarification.
- Apr 8, 2006
- 3,629
- 4
- 3
CG is just bringing obfuscation to the game, and he's declared that it's scummy to ask him to clear things up. Gee, there's nothing scummy at all about that.
I am headed out to take my wife to see Rod Stewart tonight (delayed anniversary dinner+concert) and the venue is a couple hours away so I'm headed out pretty soon and very unlikely to be back at any sort of reasonable hour. I will try and catch up when I get back, but I think my vote is in the right place.
If for some reason CG decides to be helpful to the town and clear things up instead of kicking up clouds of confusion and OMGUSing anyone who questions him, then it may be a good idea to evaluate whatever claim he comes up with that could possibly match all the hinting and innuendo he's put up, but I suspect he's going to try and keep making cryptic statements until he gets someone else to draw attention off of himself.
I am headed out to take my wife to see Rod Stewart tonight (delayed anniversary dinner+concert) and the venue is a couple hours away so I'm headed out pretty soon and very unlikely to be back at any sort of reasonable hour. I will try and catch up when I get back, but I think my vote is in the right place.
If for some reason CG decides to be helpful to the town and clear things up instead of kicking up clouds of confusion and OMGUSing anyone who questions him, then it may be a good idea to evaluate whatever claim he comes up with that could possibly match all the hinting and innuendo he's put up, but I suspect he's going to try and keep making cryptic statements until he gets someone else to draw attention off of himself.
Google