Except for Drixx, who seems to have hit his head on our patented MXC Concrete Landing Pad™.
I forget. (10 chars).
Hehehe, guess he hit his head too damn hard XD!!!
Except for Drixx, who seems to have hit his head on our patented MXC Concrete Landing Pad™.
I forget. (10 chars).
Just an assumption. The second person to vote (who also voted for me) was given a penalty so that is an interesting decision. Is there any reason for your vote other than an attempt at getting a bonus?
initial posters today seem unphased by cbg being killed.. As if trying to glaze over it.. Seems scummy to me 2.
Vote: IWANTTOUSENUMBERSINMYNAME
Reason: posted in a very neutral fashion, such practised neutrality looks like he is trying too hard to dodge suspicion so makes me instantly suspicious
I don't like 5 mins before deadline changes influenced by one post, so I will still not vote for him.
You have advocated nolynch D1 before and have said you thought that was better than a random lynch which D1 is. I don't remember which game it was, but it was after I started playing again and not one of the first ones.
It got me one prize let's see if it gets me another. My reward was a 1-time lynch immunity that may or may not be passive.
CRAP, forgot I had more to post. Oh well, too late.
In response to everyone turning on me, for whatever reasons:
First, sorry I missed the close of the day. Got tied up at work, then had to rush home to take my kid to his lessons.
Second, I had no idea that I would be expected to respond to every single post, each time I post, or be looked at as a "partial lurker" which led some of you to peg me as scum. Expect ridiculously stupid posts from me from now on, including quotes from every single post which happened after my last post.
And what's up with instant votes, without any discussion of who died? Sounds scummy to me!
That's VERY different for you. You're one of the most ardent "D1 lynch at all costs" supporters I know of. Why do you let my reasoning, or rather the "tardiness" of my reasoning, dissuade you from doing what you've always considered to be the right thing to do? That also is very different for you.
Excuse me hosts, but, if someone were to be expecting something that should have happened sometime during the night phase, approximately when would someone expect to receive any results from such a thing?
And what's up with instant votes, without any discussion of who died? Sounds scummy to me!
initial posters today seem unphased by cbg being killed.. As if trying to glaze over it.. Seems scummy to me 2.
I forget. (10 chars).
interesting, this must be the shortest post you've ever made .
is that an active or passive ability?
Clearly it's a gifts from the mafia god fuhgeddaboudit
you on crack or something?
If drixx' penalty is a character limit then that is indeed hilarious.
initial posters today seem unphased by cbg being killed.. As if trying to glaze over it.. Seems scummy to me 2.
*starts off at a jog towards door number 1*
Vote: IWANTTOUSENUMBERSINMYNAME
Reason: posted in a very neutral fashion, such practised neutrality looks like he is trying too hard to dodge suspicion so makes me instantly suspicious
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Hehehe, guess he hit his head too damn hard XD!!!
Vote: LightNingisMyNick
Nope, no reason at all. Although now that you pointed out that it was the 2nd voter who got the penalty yesterday, it makes me think I should have tried harder at my system gaming and went for 3rd or 4th.
What about your thoughts, then? You seem ready to call out others, but don't offer anything yourself.
So he's not being suspicious, therefore he is suspicious?
That's VERY different for you. You're one of the most ardent "D1 lynch at all costs" supporters I know of. Why do you let my reasoning, or rather the "tardiness" of my reasoning, dissuade you from doing what you've always considered to be the right thing to do? That also is very different for you.
I think you are blending together my thoughts from many disparate conversations. I'd say quote me, but I see the don't remember part.
Hmmm. I'm having trouble deciding if just blurting that out makes you more or less likely to be mafia. What do you think Drixx?
"thefranklin will assassinate anyone that contains letters P, N, S, or I in their forum name during tonight's phase."
First of all, I understand life happens. If you end up getting lynched while not being there, welcome to the club!
Hmm, you seem to have missed the point. You don't have to respond to every post or get looked at as a lurker. It would be nice if you contributed something. Your post here is just a complaint on how others treat you. That kind of post can be read as a scum who is trying to strong-arm the town into not voting him. Your open defiance of even trying to act like you were being helpful is the main reason you had my vote.
Quote @ Moar
I agree. Moar has never looked harder for reasons to not vote people.
This post has absolutely no place in any mafia game. I will have no problem voting for you this day phase.
So.... discuss.
My, now that's interesting. What would you suggest we do with this bit of information?
Wow, logout, overcompensating a bit? Vast wall of text seems defensive.
DARNIT! I got ninja'd, and now my post looks suspect against thefranklin in response to him squaring off with me. I guess that's the problem with making super long posts, it's easy to get ninja'd...
1. I honestly don't understand where this "open defiance" talk etc. is coming from. I asked "What is a contributing post?" in more words, not "Haha look at me, I'm not contributing! "
Thanks for that tidbit, at least now I have 2 confirmations of abnormal activity. 2. Is she Mafia more, or less often?
3. I really wish you would have eaten a sandwich or something before you posted this, because now my post looks like a response to you, which it wasn't. Which is, the WHOLE reason I posted that question in public, because I wanted something, albeit unreliable, to fall back on if I got something juicy. At least, I can say "No hey, I asked when I would get my post, then later, got my post. I didn't make the post up!" Obviously false sense of security with that plan, but at the time, it seemed better than not having anything to stand on.
4. Well, there's not much to discuss. Not on my end anyway. I would expect the voters to come forward and defend themselves and their actions. It seems OVERLY blatant to me, to jump right in to voting people right off the bat after the start of a new day phase before ANY other discussion has taken place. It screams "Oh, there's a dead body there, but I knew it would be. Waiter, can I have the soup, please?"
5. Well, I'm not sure if there's ever been a Town-aligned killer. Barring something crazy like that, I say the votes are on him. Obviously anyone that defends him are Mafia, too.
Did you forget the E?
Hey log, anyone with those letters or everyone with those letters or someone with those letters?
is that an active or passive ability?
Hmmm. I'm having trouble deciding if just blurting that out makes you more or less likely to be mafia. What do you think Drixx?
This post has absolutely no place in any mafia game. I will have no problem voting for you this day phase.
I have it on good authority that:
"thefranklin will assassinate anyone that contains letters P, N, S, or I in their forum name during tonight's phase."
This was the post I was asking the moderators about earlier.
(Okay, this is all I can think to post at this time.)
My, now that's interesting. What would you suggest we do with this bit of information?