I don't think your supposition makes sense drixx? Or at least, that your point that me posting the 4th guilty result is meaningful in any way. If you think there are too many guilty results, then *everyone* who said they received a guilty result has the same...umm..stigma, I guess?...as I do. So your basically just reiterating that you don't think it's town of me to think that BA pointing out that no lynching costs the town 33% of the opportunities to catch scum they'll have in the shortest possible time frame for the game to run, barring doc saves/other shenanigans.
Anyways...
Let's do a little thought experiment. There were 9 players to start. 2 were scum. From what everyones saying, there were definitely at least 6(because cdm may have been something other than cop) cop roles. Among those cop roles, we can speculate that there was 1 each of paranoid, sane, insane, and naive. And 2-3 other cops that could have been anything among those four categories. If the scum are also cops, then we can speculate that the game started with 2 of each type of cop, plus an additional of one type. In the first scenario, where the scum aren't cops, given that most investigations are likely going to be on town players, the insane cops are likely to result in mafia, and the paranoid will always return mafia. So that's likely 2 scum results, from what are statistically likely town investigations, from just 4 of the 6 or 7 investigative roles. if there's even one more paranoid cop, or an insane cop, then we have 3. If we look at the second scenario, and we have 8 investigative roles in play today, then again, 4 guilty results seem fairly reasonable.
Basically, I don't really see anything meaningful or special about the pool of results that we get from a single nights round of investigations. We need more information to determine ANYONES sanity. Once we establish that, through multiple investigations (or, potentially, though I think this would be a mistake, lynch someone who has investigative results on them FOR THE PURPOSE OF VERIFYING SANITY, and not because we have more reason than a questionable investigative result to think they're scum), then the truth behind other investigations should be known very quickly, and we should be able to identify the scum very quickly.
So...after all that...I'm starting to lean more towards the long no lynch till we've maximized our knowledge game plan.
Which...coincidentally...makes me doubt the towniness of BA's anti-no lynch stance.