Re: Roles of Madness. Mafia Thread
I don't think I'm ever not snooping around.
I concur with Gwaihir. The dream chosen by mafia before the day started sounds like it will have an effect during today and also for night actions tonight. Night actions will be completed and results returned/posted by the time the new dream takes effect.
Profile peeping? I was looking at several games so I don't know if the 100% reference is the "one" you saw me watching. WoT was the game I was referring to.
In what way do I contradict myself?
I don't know enough about Jcakes to make assumptions about what thoughts were or were not occurring. The 'no lynch D1' idea, if followed through, leads to a path that makes it easier for mafia to win. Mafia are more likely to follow that path. Townies don't do that intentionally but mafia often do. Ergo, someone walking the same path as benefits mafia is more likely to be mafia than a player, as compared to a player chosen at random.
This is mighty hypocritical coming from you, in several ways.
Does a game go by when you don't vote someone just to see their reaction or the reaction of others? You're not the only one allowed to perform such tests.
Most importantly, you are making more hay out of this topic than I am. You are going to great lengths to intervene. Why? How can you be so certain of his alignment that you aren't interested in how the discussion resolves of it's own volition.
Hmm, perhaps for day one. Regardless, it got Goryani snooping around.
I don't think I'm ever not snooping around.
I am curious by what he means by dreams effect day step or night step from when they are cast, but then he said they are only cast at night. That implys the dreams are only around during day (which makes no sense) .....
I concur with Gwaihir. The dream chosen by mafia before the day started sounds like it will have an effect during today and also for night actions tonight. Night actions will be completed and results returned/posted by the time the new dream takes effect.
This usually only happens if the restriction is so severe that communicating you have a restriction is impossible without being mod killed.Aren't people often not allowed to say if they have a post restriction?
What game Goryani? Cause its not the one you were looking at.
Profile peeping? I was looking at several games so I don't know if the 100% reference is the "one" you saw me watching. WoT was the game I was referring to.
And you contradict yourself there. You say scum usually work towards a no lynch. Yet Jcakes is a new player and as such would likely just want to lynch townies and wouldn't think about causing no lynches on a day where a no lynch would us of a whole lot of info.
And your vote is random cause your reasoning likely why Jcakes said what he said.
In what way do I contradict myself?
I don't know enough about Jcakes to make assumptions about what thoughts were or were not occurring. The 'no lynch D1' idea, if followed through, leads to a path that makes it easier for mafia to win. Mafia are more likely to follow that path. Townies don't do that intentionally but mafia often do. Ergo, someone walking the same path as benefits mafia is more likely to be mafia than a player, as compared to a player chosen at random.
Besides imo he only asked what we thought about it and hardly made a case out of it. People who made a discussion out of it nowbring it back.
This is mighty hypocritical coming from you, in several ways.
Does a game go by when you don't vote someone just to see their reaction or the reaction of others? You're not the only one allowed to perform such tests.
Most importantly, you are making more hay out of this topic than I am. You are going to great lengths to intervene. Why? How can you be so certain of his alignment that you aren't interested in how the discussion resolves of it's own volition.