belth said:357 total over 8 seconds, not per frame (1.788085938).
Stoutwood said:Melee characters in general do poorly against casters. I stated in the guide that this is pretty much a melee-only build.
pitzuchim said:Hi Stout, I have a couple questions for ya. First: would you take a range 1 weapon over a range 2 weapon? Razor's edge is looking really good to me right now, because of the nice deadly strike and open wounds, along with IAS and -33% target defense. However, it is a 1-range weap. Will this put me at a disadvantage against range-2 or 3 weap users? What about against other classes, like WW barbs, assassins, druids, etc? Also, I was wondering how much damage open wounds does. I found one formula which said it was somethin like (lvl * 9 + 60) / 225 * 4 * 25. At lvl 80 thats around 200 dmg, or less. Which becomes about 35 dmg in PVP. How is that any good?
chaos9 said:Okay, then how does this build do against other melee characters. I would expect it to lose consistently to ww barbs and smiters. Are there melee classes that it can beat?
Stoutwood said:I've used almost all of these setups at some point or another. My pally doesn't have a single setup. I change his gear to fit what I'm fighting.
pitzuchim said:Ah, I see. Well, I'm mostly interested in what shield and armor you use. Could you go into specifics on that? Or at least, what do you use against other pallys? Do you leave the DR on the shield and have really high defense armor, or do you sacrifice some defense and use a non-stormshield shield? I guess the best option is an exile shield and a upped shaft, but that's unaffordable at least for me
LovelyGods said:Exile = NT.
Think about it, its not rocket science, What makes a good zealot? Its Defense? Hell no. That shield is a mutated pice of crap. It doesn't do anything that a zealot needs. No Dr, No damage, no ar , no life no ias, its useless.
I can't tell u how many zealots think thats the best shield out there.
But then again, thats y all the temple zealots > exile users.
43k Defense can't save u when people have 20k ar or so.
AND, most pubby zealots have like 20k defense anyways with their exile.........
20k is easily attainable with no exile, heck i didn't think i could do it with my setup but i did, i have 21k defense now at lvl 89. :clap:
So just aim for 20k + and ur all set. There is no need for 40k unless ur a defiant in which case u should have like 80k. But thats a totally different build and its not viable.
NO EXILE!!!
LovelyGods said:Yes, Alma Negra is a horrible sheild for a zealot. :innocent:
Who needs extra damage or extra ar or more + skills anyways.
LovelyGods said::scratch: Your a Zealot Right?
Then why are u worried about resistances?
and if im not mistaken a 74/73/+2all skill alma > Hoz Thats more damage and ar then any Hoz can give.
Alma sucks at bad stats, but if stats are near perfect, alma is better then Hoz.
also it works better for my build. And nobody has a alma negra as high as mine so its :thumbsup:
LovelyGods said:Exile = NT.
Think about it, its not rocket science, What makes a good zealot? Its Defense? Hell no. That shield is a mutated pice of crap. It doesn't do anything that a zealot needs. No Dr, No damage, no ar , no life no ias, its useless.
I can't tell u how many zealots think thats the best shield out there.
But then again, thats y all the temple zealots > exile users.
43k Defense can't save u when people have 20k ar or so.
AND, most pubby zealots have like 20k defense anyways with their exile.........
20k is easily attainable with no exile, heck i didn't think i could do it with my setup but i did, i have 21k defense now at lvl 89. :clap:
So just aim for 20k + and ur all set. There is no need for 40k unless ur a defiant in which case u should have like 80k. But thats a totally different build and its not viable.
NO EXILE!!!
DistortedRiff said:I stick with HoZ, I've tried a few exiles (even a 1.1k eth vortex), but I don't think the defense gain (I have 22k without it) is worth the loss of mods from HoZ.