- Apr 8, 2006
- 3,629
- 4
- 3
I agree with you on that. But you haven't answered my question. Would you please do so?
I don't think logoutzero is actually the listener. Lynching thefranklin wouldn't tell us because the quote that logoutzero posted seems to be a very unlikely thing for one scum to be saying to the others unless it was an intentionally obfuscation in case of listener, in which case it's very likely they are not using each other's names when talking to each other. It could be a simple substitution or a shift up or down a list that they posted or any number of things so that THEY understand what's being said but that we cannot possibly understand it.
The actual chances of thefranklin being scum seem low given the supposed quote, and his reaction to the situation feels very townie.
Logoutzero, on the other hand, has been all over the place today to the point where I'm not even sure we should take his listener claim at face value. I think people saying that he's no longer valuable as a listener are probably referring to the worst case if we lynch him and he was telling the truth.
I am a bit puzzled by the votes on logout as well. Just because a listener being revealed is now useless we want to lynch him BECAUSE of this? Some of the votes have been of this nature which is bizarre. If you believe logout to be the listener you'd be voting for franklin because he has a chance to be anti-town does he not?
That's the question though. Is Logoutzero actually a listener? He's been so all over the place it's hard to say. If we believe he's the listener, then the question is whether we think the post is legitimately one scum outing the name of another scum or if the post is obfuscated by a scum team wary of a listener and thus going after thefranklin would result in lynching a townie.