mephiztophelez
New member
- Dec 17, 2006
- 4,296
- 0
- 0
Re: Magic Finding Barbarian: THE TYRANNICIDES: v3* An Expensive Build for Optimal MF-
a 2sox CoA is far more re-useable on different kinds of toons than a 6-ist sword in any case. as for Ist'ing an IK helm &/or a skullders, for crying out loud, what's wrong with p-topaz? you don't even offer it as an option. it's only 1% MF difference.
a pvp character is where most people would expect to spend a lot of their e-budget, not on a build that is ostensibly being used to create e-wealth.
CSA, the sorceress comparisons are perfectly valid. a sorc or a skelly-necro are the two most popular start-of-a-ladder-season-wealth-gathering 'toons for a REASON. they can be made from scratch, kitted out with whatever you find along the way and they work. they work far more efficiently than this build at 1/1,000,000,000th the cost.
i do take it for what it is, it's a dupewhore monstrosity of the highest order.
if there was no dupeing (or botting incidently), do you seriously think anyone (yourself included) would ever build something like this?
you seem to have a penchant for ridiculously expensive, underpowered builds. what i saw of your guardian angel wearing uber smiter build seemed to confirm this for me.
if i want to make an oddball build, because i'm rich and bored, i'll try a level 30 Uber smiter, or a pacifist necro (after levelling in NM, only kills the monsters he needs to kill to complete quests, solo, in hell). how about an attempt at Irene The Infirm (google it) or other such whackery.
perhaps accepting that those of us posting negative feedback have a point. it might go a long way to averting some of the negative feedback you get.
again: this is the THIRD time you have posted this guide..... what does that tell the rest of us?
it tells me that you just don't listen to anyone else. no matter how constructive we are when we give it. a lot of the early criticism in your first posting of this guide was very constructive. from your attitude towards those of us who tried to be helpful, we kind of got sick of being nice about it pretty quickly from memory.
i really don't think that 80% of the comments in this thread (and the other times you have posted this guide) fit the classification of "dumb, racist, mean or just stupid". most of them have been pretty well thought out and constructive.
contrast the differences between your guide and Mal's leaping GF/MF barb build. they are both ostensibly the same build. one gets positive feedback on the first attempt, the other is still getting flamed three postings later. gee, why is that i wonder? attitude of the writer to criticism is a major factor i'd wager.
just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make that person "dumb, racist, mean or just stupid". this is exactly an example of your attitude that pisses the rest of us right off.
the truly "dumb, racist, mean or just stupid" comments posted in "some of the best guides on these forums" tend to be one person posting it, not legions of us posting it. such posts also tend to be ignored by those who actually understand what they are talking about.
this forum is, to my mind, one of the three best D2 community forums on the interweb (the Barons Bazaar and the Amazon Basin being the other two). We are lucky that we have some of the most knowledgable D2 people on the planet posting here.
yes, yes it does. it needs to sink to the bottom of the forum list and never, ever, be seen or heard of again.
2sox CoA's and high-end runewords are usually reccomended for use on PvP characters, not MF 'toons. most (but by no means all) people try to keep their MF 'toons as cheap as possible.Besides alot of powerful builds require similarly or even more expensive items than six-isted swords... A two socket crown of ages and high level runewords come to mind...
a 2sox CoA is far more re-useable on different kinds of toons than a 6-ist sword in any case. as for Ist'ing an IK helm &/or a skullders, for crying out loud, what's wrong with p-topaz? you don't even offer it as an option. it's only 1% MF difference.
a pvp character is where most people would expect to spend a lot of their e-budget, not on a build that is ostensibly being used to create e-wealth.
most, not all but a large percentage, of people who have stupid amounts of D2 e-wealth tend to go into the PvP aspects of the game and spend their wealth there, not making yet another MF 'toon.Doesn't anyone want to play around with all the wealth they've accrued in D2 over the past many years? And also, this is the BARBARIAN forum, please take the sorceress discussion elsewhere!!
CSA, the sorceress comparisons are perfectly valid. a sorc or a skelly-necro are the two most popular start-of-a-ladder-season-wealth-gathering 'toons for a REASON. they can be made from scratch, kitted out with whatever you find along the way and they work. they work far more efficiently than this build at 1/1,000,000,000th the cost.
My problem is that I don't want to debate whether this is or is not a build at all, as some might. Just take it for what it is.
i do take it for what it is, it's a dupewhore monstrosity of the highest order.
if there was no dupeing (or botting incidently), do you seriously think anyone (yourself included) would ever build something like this?
you seem to have a penchant for ridiculously expensive, underpowered builds. what i saw of your guardian angel wearing uber smiter build seemed to confirm this for me.
if i want to make an oddball build, because i'm rich and bored, i'll try a level 30 Uber smiter, or a pacifist necro (after levelling in NM, only kills the monsters he needs to kill to complete quests, solo, in hell). how about an attempt at Irene The Infirm (google it) or other such whackery.
Perhaps I should stop commenting on most of the negative feedback I get
perhaps accepting that those of us posting negative feedback have a point. it might go a long way to averting some of the negative feedback you get.
again: this is the THIRD time you have posted this guide..... what does that tell the rest of us?
it tells me that you just don't listen to anyone else. no matter how constructive we are when we give it. a lot of the early criticism in your first posting of this guide was very constructive. from your attitude towards those of us who tried to be helpful, we kind of got sick of being nice about it pretty quickly from memory.
as most people on other forums or youtube know, about 80% of comments are dumb, racist, mean or just stupid. Maybe there's a little bit of that going on here... I've seen posts like this on some of the best guides on these forums. It's a shame..
i really don't think that 80% of the comments in this thread (and the other times you have posted this guide) fit the classification of "dumb, racist, mean or just stupid". most of them have been pretty well thought out and constructive.
contrast the differences between your guide and Mal's leaping GF/MF barb build. they are both ostensibly the same build. one gets positive feedback on the first attempt, the other is still getting flamed three postings later. gee, why is that i wonder? attitude of the writer to criticism is a major factor i'd wager.
just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make that person "dumb, racist, mean or just stupid". this is exactly an example of your attitude that pisses the rest of us right off.
the truly "dumb, racist, mean or just stupid" comments posted in "some of the best guides on these forums" tend to be one person posting it, not legions of us posting it. such posts also tend to be ignored by those who actually understand what they are talking about.
this forum is, to my mind, one of the three best D2 community forums on the interweb (the Barons Bazaar and the Amazon Basin being the other two). We are lucky that we have some of the most knowledgable D2 people on the planet posting here.
It does not need to "die"....
yes, yes it does. it needs to sink to the bottom of the forum list and never, ever, be seen or heard of again.
ok, credit where it's due. i'll vouch this.omgwtfbbqpwned said:I have to admit though, the effort put into writing this guide really shows. The lay-out, structure, and format is one of the most appealing I've seen in guides.
Last edited: