Snark much? You decided, based upon your "feeling" that BPC wasn't scum, that you would not put the lock vote on him and tried (successfully) to derail the train on him, despite the hugely erratic posts he made all day. You took it upon yourself to be the sole arbiter of whether the lynch would happen (time was running out rapidly, there was no guarantee anyone else would show up, and you refused to ensure that the town used our only power), based solely upon your opinion that BPC is a townie, despite the almost ridiculous amount of posts he made that would seem to indicate he's either scum or suicidal. Your refusal to seal the deal was the proximate cause to the town failing to lynch anyone day one, and you can equivocate and toss snark around all you like, but that won't change the fact that
you derailed that train for no better reason than your "feeling".
Please explain to everyone how it's my fault that Drixx, Caluin Graye, Bad Ash and ThunderCat didn't vote BipolarChemist at the end of the day. Please explain to everyone how it's my fault that Caluin Graye, Bad Ash and ThunderCat didn't vote BipolarChemst when just one more vote would have locked?
I've been accused a lot of things over the years but this is one of the most absurd. I think it's second only to when a serial killer said I lost the game for the town when claiming cop before D2.
You derailed the wagon with very little time left in the day. The only active people at that point were you and the people who already had votes on BPC. Since you refused to vote for BPC, we were forced to go to another option, but we lacked enough active people to lynch
you and you refused to lynch BPC, so yes, it's your fault. You made the play, so don't go trying to weasel out of it afterwards.
If you don't consider the explanation I gave in #131 "good enough" then I'm sure you will be disappointed. It's not the only reason but it's the biggest.
"I don't think X players is Y role" is never a good enough explanation, especially when said player had the post history in the game that BPC did when you made the comment. You would [highlight]never[/highlight] accept that from someone else, so why do you expect us to accept it from you?
p.s. - How did that search for my "lynch anyone even if you think they are townie in order to obtain information" quote go?
You and I both know the forum search function is broken. Challenging me to an impossible task and then gloating when I can't search your posts ... that's your play to convince us you're a good guy?
I support D1 lynches. I oppose D1 lynches regardless. I oppose lynching for information.
Is everyone else as confused by this as I am? You support D1 lynches (except yesterday apparently). You oppose D1 lynches regardless (of what?) and you oppose lynching for information. I hate to tell you but apart from a Sane Cop's reveal, a major slip up or a party host bit of information that confirms someone is scum, [highlight]all lynches[/highlight] are for information.
Bah. Forgot to mention you didn't answer the third question either. 0 for 3.
Speaking of not answering questions, not only did you refuse to answer mine, you responded with a lot of snark and OMGUS style comments to shove a pile of questions back on me.
Because you refused to lock the lynch on yesterday's most odd behaving person, because you refused to answer any questions about what you had to go on besides a "feeling", because you are going totally OMGUS on everyone questioning you, because you have contradicted yourself all over the place, and most importantly because you were the scummiest player yesterday (BPC notwithstanding, assuming the odd posts were a "mafia couldn't possibly be dumb enough to call that kind of attention to themselves" LAMIST play),
Vote: Goryani