Create Your Own Role Mafia game

[Bad Ash]

Is posting a naked butt against forum rules? Cause I was just looking for pics to show how lazy I felt when I should have read all the roles thoroughly, and there was a dude laying naked sunbathing and I for some reason found this hilarious.

 

[Malevolent]

@ bad ash, i didnt let my buddy do that spamming at all, i did it all by myself

i really don't think that anything more needs to be said today, lets just get rid of sath. I will most likely be asleep for the day end but i know my vote is in the right place.

Also- not that long ago somebody asked how moar used her politician thing after 24 hours, it is because this is a 72 hour day so those abilities work in the first 36 hours, it was stated in one of the opening posts from gory.

 

[Ankeli1]

Remember that there is a chance that the role could get resurrected with the tarot cards. I'm surprised that the last few pages (minus Mals spam) have solely revolved around catching the one with the spammer role.

@All - Mal. Can we just smack him up and claim it was in self-defense? That's pretty American ain't it?

I don't think it's revolving as much around catching the spammer as its revolving around catching the one who opposed claiming roles the following day. I could be an idiot and need proof reading though. However, my vote stays on Sath because...

Sigh, doesn't anyone get my point as a warning? I can't stop you from doing what you want to do. I've never been a player to analyse every role and action. We haven't even seen the effects of any role yet, let's just calm down and see how fast/good we can sift through the actions tomorrow.

A warning? Really? Also, this quote ^ was in response to me, and it's sole purpose is to make amends to me, and that is something Sathoris never does. Has never done, will never do. Not the Sathoris I've played with, and butted heads with on more than one occasion. On those occasions, that Sathoris has been pro-town, and he's lashed out on me harder than I took it to him. Not this Sathoris. This Sathoris is mafia.

 

[Solar Ice]

The BFF thing is interesting.
Town + Town
Town + Mafia
Mafia + Mafia

Town + Town, has the situation where no one can truly trust each other. In which case, maybe confirming the BFF is town can be very helpful.

Town + Mafia, Again, Town won't trust the other member, but I can see mafia making up stuff to try to cloud their judgemnet

and M+M doesn't really add much.

The BFF claiming could let us work on us confirming they are town. From there, the 'Paris'' of the world (lulz) will know if they can trust him/her or not.

...boobbucket....hawt.

When do you suggest this claim take place?
If the BFF claims, how high is chance of the BFF getting NK'd?


How would you go about confirming for certain that the BFF is Town? And in a similar vein, can the BFF trust Paris? That is the problematic issue that I see. We have no Cop to investigate the BFF (or any Paris or that matter) to confirm their innocence nor do we have any similar investigative role. What if Paris is the Mafioso when the BFF is Town? It all leads me to belive that the entire role shoul be treated with care and a healthy dose of suspicion.

 

[Solar Ice]

i have been reading everything you say sath, and i am not ridfing the heat, im fact i am one creating a lot of it.

kestegs also does seem kind of suspicious gwai, but sath is just digging his grave, also his huge amount of posts makes me nervous too.

Vote: Sathoris

well i am not too sure about the kestegs+sath situation, but since kestegs isn't going to spam it up i guess i will have to, sorry about this guys..

You mention huge amounts of posts being a oncerne to you and yet you go on to do just that? Should we now be nervous about you?


And Malevolent, in case you did not notice almost everyone throughout the game that posted in multiple consecutive posts, did so with relevant content (barring a joke here and there). Your posting spree makes me believe that you are the hiding Mafioso that should be lynched.


And I actually view posting sprees such as yours to be an abuse of the role and the spirit of the game.


Vote: Malevolent

 

[Solar Ice]

I got the frienfly reminder at 22:54 (GMT +2 here) and after a question and reply I send my bribe in 23:06.

That is a rotten excuse. I took your vote out of the pool because I blieve you are mafia. That's a good thing for town. One less mafia who can vote. I would have to be correct with my readig there and yes, I am confident. You are scum.

Overconfidence like that is not going to do anyone any good at this stage of the game. On Day 1. Yes, he could well be Scum though remember how confident you were about MartinLong in Cheers?

 

[Solar Ice]

the misquote was just that Moar has very obviously made himself connected to Mal, which holds no water whatsoever unless the roles I skimmed have some kind of day talk which is entirely possible

Herself. Did you think Glib's earlier post meant that he, erm, bats for the other team?

I'm sorry sweetheart I wasn't clear. I meant you bare on a rug. I hope that's clearer.....and pics start showing up in my inbox PRONTO!!!

 

[Solar Ice]

To be honest I wouldn't mind if the kingmaker claimed straight away and we lynched him today just to get the role out of the way. It's a game changing role for either party, but the mafia has so much of an easier time using it efficiently than the town does that it's not even funny. That is, if the current kingmaker feels up to dying this early. Personally, I'll claim it straight off if I get it just to get it out.

The reason why I do not like this post or this idea is that we only have 13 players in the game. You seem to be unconcerned about a mislynch occurring as long as a role is out of the way. Depending on the amount of Mafia in the game, two or three mislynches and a couple of NKs mean that we have lost the game. I would vote you, if I did not find Malevolent's actions to be so scummy.

 

[Ankeli1]

You mention huge amounts of posts being a oncerne to you and yet you go on to do just that? Should we now be nervous about you?


And Malevolent, in case you did not notice almost everyone throughout the game that posted in multiple consecutive posts, did so with relevant content (barring a joke here and there). Your posting spree makes me believe that you are the hiding Mafioso that should be lynched.


And I actually view posting sprees such as yours to be an abuse of the role and the spirit of the game.


Vote: Malevolent

Are you trolling? You criticize Malevolent for posting huge amounts, and proceed to do the exact same thing yourself? At least Mal gave a reason for it, he wanted to catch up with Sathoris' posts because Sath claimed the spammer today and is a plausible lynch target. That is why the content was low. Your last paragraph / sentence is the best/worst self troll I've seen. Ever.

The reason why I do not like this post or this idea is that we only have 13 players in the game. You seem to be unconcerned about a mislynch occurring as long as a role is out of the way. Depending on the amount of Mafia in the game, two or three mislynches and a couple of NKs mean that we have lost the game. I would vote you, if I did not find Malevolent's actions to be so scummy.

Is it a mislynch if we remove a power that is extremely difficult for the town to make use of, and very easy for the mafia to abuse?

I'd absolutely love to vote for you because of these posts. Hell, since Sath is the spammer and can spam himself to safety, I'll do just that.

Unvote: Sathoris
Vote: Solar Ice

 

[Solar Ice]

Are you trolling? You criticize Malevolent for posting huge amounts, and proceed to do the exact same thing yourself? At least Mal gave a reason for it, he wanted to catch up with Sathoris' posts because Sath claimed the spammer today and is a plausible lynch target. That is why the content was low. Your last paragraph / sentence is the best/worst self troll I've seen. Ever.

Unlike my supposed "troll", as you put it, my posts have relevant content. Malevolent's do not. That was my point. And who the hell knows what Malevolent's real intentions are regarding the Spam? If he is Mafia, perhaps it is a good way to ensure that the Spammer gets lynched?

Is it a mislynch if we remove a power that is extremely difficult for the town to make use of, and very easy for the mafia to abuse?

I'd absolutely love to vote for you because of these posts. Hell, since Sath is the spammer and can spam himself to safety, I'll do just that.

Unvote: Sathoris
Vote: Solar Ice

If the current Kingmaker is Town, yes it absolutely is a mislynch. How can you not see that? We will be down a Town player and the Mafia are closer to victory. Was it not you who said that if the Kingmaker over-rides the Majority, he/she is Scum unless they know more than the rest do not? The King is not forced to switch lynches. He is only forced to have the power to do so. As Town, it would make far more sense to just not use the role.

Then what about the Frankensten role? Mis-lynch the Kingmaker, have at some point a Mafioso Dr. Frankenstein bring it right back. Mafia 1 Town 0. Did you really not consider this scenario as you stated, or did you just state that as an excuse, once Moar pointed it out to you?

Your suggestion makes perfect sense from the Mafia perspective - Generate a possible mislynch getting the Scum one step closer to victiory.

 

[thefranklin]

@ bad ash, i didnt let my buddy do that spamming at all, i did it all by myself

i really don't think that anything more needs to be said today, lets just get rid of sath. I will most likely be asleep for the day end but i know my vote is in the right place.

Also- not that long ago somebody asked how moar used her politician thing after 24 hours, it is because this is a 72 hour day so those abilities work in the first 36 hours, it was stated in one of the opening posts from gory.

That was me. Day powers were extended an entire. No problem with that now, thanks for pointing that out Mal. It was in the opening day post.

How often have we seen it work well for the town when people start saying "I don't care, I just want so-and-so lynched?" And Moar, the use of your power on D1 is not something I would think of as town friendly. Unless your intuition early in the day is correct, you just caused the required number for a lock to increase to 9 people. That is how I think of it (actually, if we do 8 out of 12 that is 75%). And we have some trains developing, so lets hope it doesn't hamstring us.

 

[thefranklin]

•entire day, whoops.

Spam spam spam

 

[Goryani]

Vote Count:
Gwaihir (0) -
Sathoris (2) - Malevolent, kestegs
kestegs (2) - Gwaihir, Moar
Malevolent (3) - Sathoris. Bad Ash, Solar Ice
Solar Ice (1) - Ankeli

Vote count updated through post #212.
There are 13 players alive. It takes 7 votes to lynch and 8 votes to lock.

 

[Kestegs]

show me these quoted questions and i will gladly answer them.

so you would rather i repeated exactly what they said and vote? i cannot help it when i share the same feelings about a summy play with another player can i?

why didn't you just answer them the first time?

explain why you think someone is scummy. quote some posts maybe , do a little research. Just following the opinion of someone else blindly is bad for the town.

 

[Kestegs]

show me these quoted questions and i will gladly answer them.

Are you sure you didn't mix up your first and second pm's?

well, okay, admittedly this one was slightly sarcastic

So you're not sure about sath, but you want to make sure he doesn't get NK immunity? Am I missing the logic in here?

please explain.

I even said please on this one.

Do you have any thoughts of your own, or are you going to let your bud answer all your questions?

This one you mostly answered after I pressed you about it in the post following it.

 

[Ankeli1]

By your logic, S I, if there was a mafia who could resurrect one of their own lynching a mafioso would be useless because he could be just brought back up. If a mafia would bring the role back the daily reveals would speak of it sooner than later.

My vote stays untillthe rest of the day because Sath is probably going to spam his way to safety and I don't want to lynch Mal.

 

[Solar Ice]

By your logic, S I, if there was a mafia who could resurrect one of their own lynching a mafioso would be useless because he could be just brought back up. If a mafia would bring the role back the daily reveals would speak of it sooner than later.

My vote stays untillthe rest of the day because Sath is probably going to spam his way to safety and I don't want to lynch Mal.

I would agree with that if not for one thing: Goryani's changing of the rules to No-Reveal of role and alignment upon NK. Do the Mafia get to hide under fake-claims? Do they get roles revealed to them of the players they NK in this game? Claim a role that is relatively easy to fake and use Frankenstein/whatever other role in relative safety?

Though perhaps I am not seeing something obvious?

 

[Solar Ice]

Oh and by the way, Ankeli, I did not do "the exact same thing" as Mal. I had 5 Posts in a row, not 18.

 

[flubbucket1]

That was me. Day powers were extended an entire. No problem with that now, thanks for pointing that out Mal. It was in the opening day post.

How often have we seen it work well for the town when people start saying "I don't care, I just want so-and-so lynched?" And Moar, the use of your power on D1 is not something I would think of as town friendly. Unless your intuition early in the day is correct, you just caused the required number for a lock to increase to 9 people. That is how I think of it (actually, if we do 8 out of 12 that is 75%). And we have some trains developing, so lets hope it doesn't hamstring us.

Well last game my intuition was convinced you (thefranklin) were scummy and I believe you felt likewise.

...I even said please on this one...

Obvious scum tell...

By your logic, S I, if there was a mafia who could resurrect one of their own lynching a mafioso would be useless because he could be just brought back up. If a mafia would bring the role back the daily reveals would speak of it sooner than later.

My vote stays untillthe rest of the day because Sath is probably going to spam his way to safety and I don't want to lynch Mal.

And your reason for not wanting to lynch Malevolent is....................because of the reason.

 

[Gwaihir]

Why do you vote for Malevolent then?
I voted for kestegs because of his reaction to his forced role. Both Sathoris and kestegs are on my top 2 list. Sath pretty much claimed spammer earlier and was top poster before Mal went on a spree. I'd vote Sath before kestegs if it's very close to day end and he doesn't have highest post count by about 10.

So first you ask Sath why he votes Mal. Then you ask thefranklin why he votes Mal. Why are you so convinced of his innocence?

i really don't think that anything more needs to be said today, lets just get rid of sath. I will most likely be asleep for the day end but i know my vote is in the right place.

Also- not that long ago somebody asked how moar used her politician thing after 24 hours, it is because this is a 72 hour day so those abilities work in the first 36 hours, it was stated in one of the opening posts from gory.

1) Yup, lets just not use the rest of the time we have. Great idea.
2) Not a general defense of Moar, and it was a general rules question - but here you are stepping in for her.

This is what, the fourth or fifth time you two have been associated?

I would agree with that if not for one thing: Goryani's changing of the rules to No-Reveal of role and alignment upon NK. Do the Mafia get to hide under fake-claims? Do they get roles revealed to them of the players they NK in this game? Claim a role that is relatively easy to fake and use Frankenstein/whatever other role in relative safety?

Though perhaps I am not seeing something obvious?

Role rotation. As soon as a townie gets the role, or we see the role used, a mafia gets lynched.


Anyways, Mal and Moar seem linked at the hip so far this game, and with no masons, I don't see any town reason for it.

Unvote: kestegs
Vote: Malevolent