Create Your Own Role Mafia game

[thefranklin]

Vote: Malevolent

Had to be done. My next vote is for the creator of the role.

So the politician votes for the person they forced to vote for another person. This politician seems to be playing for mislynches, and this politician certainly has my vote.

 

[Moar]

So you're not sure about sath, but you want to make sure he doesn't get NK immunity? Am I missing the logic in here?

please explain.

I am sure about Sath being mafia, but since he is the spammer we can't lynch him. So I go for you, his buddy.

 

[flubbucket1]

I'm ready to vote Malevolent after that little stunt.

 

[Malevolent]

Vote: Malevolent

Had to be done. My next vote is for the creator of the role.

So the politician votes for the person they forced to vote for another person. This politician seems to be playing for mislynches, and this politician certainly has my vote.

i am not the politician.

i didnt want a myslych today, hence the green eggs and spam

 

[Moar]

Vote: Malevolent

Had to be done. My next vote is for the creator of the role.

So the politician votes for the person they forced to vote for another person. This politician seems to be playing for mislynches, and this politician certainly has my vote.

Why do you vote for Malevolent then?
I voted for kestegs because of his reaction to his forced role. Both Sathoris and kestegs are on my top 2 list. Sath pretty much claimed spammer earlier and was top poster before Mal went on a spree. I'd vote Sath before kestegs if it's very close to day end and he doesn't have highest post count by about 10.

 

[Malevolent]

need me to reinforce that moar

 

[Kestegs]

I got the frienfly reminder at 22:54 (GMT +2 here) and after a question and reply I send my bribe in 23:06.

That is a rotten excuse. I took your vote out of the pool because I blieve you are mafia. That's a good thing for town. One less mafia who can vote. I would have to be correct with my readig there and yes, I am confident. You are scum.

Fair enough, I was just asking. You're entitled to your opinion.

I am sure about Sath being mafia, but since he is the spammer we can't lynch him. So I go for you, his buddy.

I didn't ask you.

need me to reinforce that moar

Do you have any thoughts of your own, or are you going to let your bud answer all your questions?

 

[MartinLong]

Remember that there is a chance that the role could get resurrected with the tarot cards. I'm surprised that the last few pages (minus Mals spam) have solely revolved around catching the one with the spammer role.

@All - Mal. Can we just smack him up and claim it was in self-defense? That's pretty American ain't it?

 

[Malevolent]

kestegs, really?

you critisize me for not being groundbreaking enough, yet you are doing the exact same thing. Neither of us have come up with anything new but we both comment and share our thoughts about the situation.

heres my thoughts, you and sath are scum!

 

[MartinLong]

Remember that there is a chance that the role could get resurrected with the tarot cards. I'm surprised that the last few pages (minus Mals spam) have solely revolved around catching the one with the spammer role.

@All - Mal. Can we just smack him up and claim it was in self-defense? That's pretty American ain't it?

Ah, I seem to have misread the main point to the spamming - it's not about getting rid of it, it's mislynching... I'm sorry I must have forgot while I was scrolling through 3 pages of useless posts (Mal) in hope for some discussion.

 

[thefranklin]

Unvote: Malovolent
Vote: Kestegs

Mal, you got a policy vote for spamming like a spaz. Kegs gets a vote for mals spamming. I am just having some fun with the game!

 

[Moar]

Remember that there is a chance that the role could get resurrected with the tarot cards. I'm surprised that the last few pages (minus Mals spam) have solely revolved around catching the one with the spammer role.

@All - Mal. Can we just smack him up and claim it was in self-defense? That's pretty American ain't it?

Did you follow the game at all? There's a role that can resurect and it has nothing to do with a tarot card.

I don't smack minors. But I don't mind lynching them though.

 

[MartinLong]

Did you follow the game at all? There's a role that can resurect and it has nothing to do with a tarot card.

Over-whelmed is a more fitting word.

I don't smack minors. But I don't mind lynching them though.

Just as good.

 

[thefranklin]

Unvote: Kestegs

Silly spammers.

For me it is a break of the rules. The rules say you shall not say what info you got in a PM stating that it was from a PM. This is very much my personality coming in here. I always play by the rules and consider them to be very serious. Otherwise why should I play? Yes, the info of 4 mafia is probably good to know for the town but in my understanding it was obtained the wrong way. In a cheating way and it does spoil the game a bit for me. I don't want to know that there are most likely 4 mafia just because the host made a mistake. Feels terribly wrong to me.

This was directly after her first quote I quoted earlier, and highlighted a bit about the part where she was calling out Mal for not following rules. To me it came across as scum trying to get a modkill on town. If you read this far. now read the bolded part. Now read the unbolded part. Since no one did that, the unbolded part can seem like mafia whining about their numbers being leaked. But I like to see things my way, so no big deal.

And now for the bolded part, I could be wrong but the game started 48 hours ago? And what power did the politician use just a few hours ago? The one that stated before 24 hours have expired in the day phase? What, a rule? Comment Moar?

 

[Kestegs]

kestegs, really?

you critisize me for not being groundbreaking enough, yet you are doing the exact same thing. Neither of us have come up with anything new but we both comment and share our thoughts about the situation.

heres my thoughts, you and sath are scum!

That may be true, but I'm not voting for someone with the reasoning "what they said" (obviously I can't vote, but I wouldn't do that anyways)

Now that's at least 3 direct questions you've ignored. Why are you afraid to answer questions?

 

[Goryani]

Vote Count:
Gwaihir (1) - Bad Ash
Sathoris (3) - Ankeli, Malevolent, kestegs
kestegs (2) - Gwaihir, Moar
Malevolent (1) - Sathoris

Vote count updated through post #195.

 

[Malevolent]

show me these quoted questions and i will gladly answer them.

so you would rather i repeated exactly what they said and vote? i cannot help it when i share the same feelings about a summy play with another player can i?

 

[Bad Ash]

When does the day end?

i have been reading everything you say sath, and i am not ridfing the heat, im fact i am one creating a lot of it.

kestegs also does seem kind of suspicious gwai, but sath is just digging his grave, also his huge amount of posts makes me nervous too.

Vote: Sathoris

His huge amount of posts make you nervous. yet you vote for him. And then let your buddy do the spamming for you? hmm.

Please quote and reason more why you vote him. Right now I can't see it. I don't get a really scummy vibe from him. He always writes a bit scummy, but he did that both as scum and not, verified by last game. You look far more scummy to me. You don't want a role claim as it takes too much time. You soften up when you see it was not the best thing to say. You surely spam. What's wrong with multiquoting? I'll be back with a post about your posts.

And a very obvious potential connection..

Note to self, if I ever meet Malevolent in person, to slap him.

LOL! seconded.

I am sure about Sath being mafia, but since he is the spammer we can't lynch him. So I go for you, his buddy.

How are you sure? With no night phase? Lets hear it and it better be great.

Unvote: Gwaihir
Vote: Malevolent

 

[Gwaihir]

Well, I thought it was possible to get the spammer lynched if we are careful with when to have the most posts. I asked questions and apparently i was wrong. So I don't think a spam war is an option. The spammer can always win.

I want Sathoris lynched, see earlier comments. He has pretty much admitted the spammer so there is not a chance to lynch him unfortunately I think.

First read thought this was sarcastic. Second read not so sure, but your vote is still on Sath. Can you explain of your thoughts and actions here?

For having nothing better to do he is quite the proficient lurker this game. He did pop in the second he was voted on to return an OMGUS vote though, so he's obviously reading the game.

I had missed the OMGUS vote there. Thanks for picking it out.

Note to self, if I ever meet Malevolent in person, to slap him.

Lol. I actually kinda want to go back and read some Suess now.

When does the day end?

His huge amount of posts make you nervous. yet you vote for him. And then let your buddy do the spamming for you? hmm.


And a very obvious potential connection..

How are you sure? With no night phase? Lets hear it and it better be great.

Few hours under a day now.
I think you have a miss quote on #2
3 and 4 I was thinking the same thing myself.

 

[Bad Ash]

the misquote was just that Moar has very obviously made himself connected to Mal, which holds no water whatsoever unless the roles I skimmed have some kind of day talk which is entirely possible