Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.
I'm still thinking there are better ones but we will never get the votes
Not with that attitude. If you think someone else is a better lynch target then name him with some evidence and we may well switch. This is almost as bad as TC's threat on Mara.
since he has, yet again, avoided my question
You still haven't Goryani's question either, I called you on it and ignored it as well. You can't use that reasoning if you yourself are guilty of it aswell.
Sathoris is also a bit suspicious because he pushed for my lynch two days in a row which resulted in a no lynch situation.
So my scumhunting and sticking to my beliefs caused a no lynch situation twice? Give me a break, the only reason we didn't have a lynch was because people didn't bother to show up and vote. Nobody gave a valid alternative. Let them find someone to lynch then and I'll just lurk without voting..
I believe I still have one of the most powerful abilities a townie can have apart from my investigative powers, but I won't reveal this information unless I am lynched or some other specific event happens as that would render it useless.
Sorry to say this, but you haven't exactly dazzled us with your powerful abilities. So far you've given us nothing to work on.
Speculative question:
If TC was mafia and had strangled Laarz, he would have known Laarz's role and thus could have set himself up with a fictitious "Coroner" role.
This isn't what has happened - he claims to have investigated Feysal and come up with a role. What's more, it is a role I have reason to believe is correct.
You have reason to believe it's correct because it's already been confirmed by Valhauros. Don't give credit to TC for mentioning that rolename.
And the mafia almost always get the rolename of the people they killl. The fact that it's not even automatic (as you'd expect) or like the standard coroner role, but it's precisely a role the mafia can take advantage of.
You of all people should know that claiming cop isn't a Harry Potter invisibility cloak. The insistence of Feysal and some others of never lynching a claimed power role the day they claim ensures that is how mafia will behave if cornered: claim a power role and give as little info as possible. Fake claiming to have investigated one's self for sanity and claiming failure to investigate the recently deceased fall under that umbrella. Not undertaking any steps to improve one's claimed investigations also falls under that category.
I believe that you believe this. Therefore, I'm unsure why you are going against that belief by listing what you would normally consider pro-town behavior as reason to find someone scummy.
Claiming cop on D1 as mafia is bound to get you lynched sometime in the game when it's obvious you're not giving us proper investigations. Lynching him on the day he claimed is stupid, because if mara was telling the truth we would know about it later, if he didn't we would know it aswell. No need to quicklynch him just because he claimed.
P.S. - TC's 'give me a better target' line came BEFORE Mara soft claimed cop. It came after the soft claim of power role but before Mara's 'I'm sane' comment. A LOT of players are getting that timeline messed up.
Your point? I had my quotes correct.
Why is it convenient he couldn't get Leo's role? It sounds like you know that Leo had a role other than cityslicker.
Because the only 'evidence' he gave us is a role we already know to be in the game. Val's modkilled confirmed he was a cityslicker. Giving us another cityslicker would look weak and he can't just make some role up incase someone else holds it. A convenient no result means he doesn't have to lie to us.
---
Order of quotes may be mixed but I kept losing internet connection and things got complicated. Decided to post before I lost it all. Need to get home to a proper connection to read and comment on the rest.