Mafia Game: Cheers/Frasier Theme

[Bad Ash]

The second vote is going to be an interesting dynamic. The question will be: do we want to use it on lurkers? or should we try to double scum hunt? I feel like I wont be using the second vote a lot unless I feel strongly about someone. We dont need to be killing a second drunky and hurting the towns chances.

The more false lynches we have will lead to faster LYLO as always....but no one should worry about the mafia having 75% of the vote because that would lead to automatic GG (since if they have 50% of the numbers its already over)

Also: If I am ever going to be thrown out of the bar, give me a warning so I can order a round of shots, all for myself. I plan on being blacked out if I am to be asked to leave.

Since this is Cheers, shouldn't we all know eachothers names? Im Bad Ash, damn glad to meet ya

 

[MartinLong]

It can also be used quite well to thin the heard of mafia scum as well, granted there is good evidence to support that we know 2 are scummy. It will definitely make this game faster, especially with almost 30 people.

 

[Kestegs]

Wouldn't it be fairly hard to get mafia on that second train as they will likely hold 25% or more of the votes at some point?

 

[MartinLong]

Wouldn't it be fairly hard to get mafia on that second train as they will likely hold 25% or more of the votes at some point?

Exactly. So, we need to work hard early game to keep the 75% on town, b/c if to many wrong moves are made, yes the second vote will be lost. What I can see happening though, if town looses the 75%, but the mafia are good at persuading the town, we could end up loosing even more folk.

"We are the 75%" Lulz.

 

[Autti]

Wouldn't it be fairly hard to get mafia on that second train as they will likely hold 25% or more of the votes at some point?

and hence it would be super obvious who the mafia is.

the mafia have to get on the trains to look townie.

People refusing to vote for a super scummy vote 2 would be equally scummy.

 

[Gwaihir]

lots of scum in this game by my analysis. I just hope no one got the role of eddie. would be an obvious post restriction

Wiki says Eddie is the dog (I assume that gives away my lack on knowledge about the show)? Interesting, the first story did mention one.

Would be as bad as timmay. But how could that be cured? Maybe a little Snow White lore in there?

Please no. That mades the doc's brain hurt.

Do we HAVE to use vote 2 to lynch lurkers? i see it as a great opportunity to lynch 2 scum in 1 day.

This was my first thought, I see no reason why we can't. 2 lynches per mafia kill seems really good for us. The trouble will be getting enough votes to hit 75% I think.

Should I bother brushing up on lore to scum hunt? I already feel I'm in over my head. I'm fine with Frasier but I have no idea about Cheers.

I am hoping no as I know nothing about the topic.

I'm waiting on Thyiad before I post.

Except you just posted about waiting to post. I find that very odd.

Wouldn't it be fairly hard to get mafia on that second train as they will likely hold 25% or more of the votes at some point?

and hence it would be super obvious who the mafia is.

the mafia have to get on the trains to look townie.

People refusing to vote for a super scummy vote 2 would be equally scummy.

I didn't think about this originally. It does seem like if we can get to 75% easily, the person is more likely to be town, as mafia didn't try putting on the brakes. But managing to get a scum lynched with it could give us a lot of info. Still think it is worth trying.

 

[flubbucket1]

Oh yeah, I totally forgot. I guess it just doesn't count, then. However, my opinion still stands!

Your Opinion?! Opinions are like kestegs....worthless!! Now shut up and buy a drink and stop wasting stool space!

ordering a beer in a bar: scum tell

voting with vote 1 before vote 2: scum tell

voting when you cant vote: scum tell

lots of scum in this game by my analysis. I just hope no one got the role of eddie. would be an obvious post restriction

Same goes for you blabbermouth!! Nobody cares what you think. You want to buy shots then go ahead. You don't have to run your mouth to do it now do ya??

*mutters under breath*

You got somethin' to say smart guy??

 

[Malevolent]

so who is the cheers/fraiser character who only critisises other peopel because it looks like fubb has some sort of restriction.

If somebody with cheers/fraiser experience could shed some light?

 

[Malevolent]

ADD TO ABOVE

he sounds like a barkeeper trying to get people to buy drinks

 

[FredOfErik]

Moar, do you have a post restriction where you have to stay in role, or are you just having fun?

What is this? Noodle posting early in the game? With and actual game-relevant question? This stinks.

ADD TO ABOVE

he sounds like a barkeeper trying to get people to buy drinks

That would be one ****ty barkeeper.

I'm far from a cheers expert and it has been a long time since I watched it last, but I do think I have an idea about who glib could be.

 

[Goryani]

I'm waiting on Thyiad before I post.

You seem to have oopsied.

The second vote is going to be an interesting dynamic. The question will be: do we want to use it on lurkers? or should we try to double scum hunt? I feel like I wont be using the second vote a lot unless I feel strongly about someone. We dont need to be killing a second drunky and hurting the towns chances.

VERY interesting dynamic!

If vote 2 is a lynch lynch, we should use it like vote 1: on scum. Using it on a lurker is "not good" unless someone wants to also vote 1 that lurker.

Furthermore, vote 2 isn't just 75% for a lynch. The rules say 75% rounded up PLUS 1. That's 22 votes needed with 27 players in the game - pretty difficult to achieve. It's fairly rare to see "75% rounded up plus 1" players vote on D1 or any other day, let alone all vote for the same person.

People refusing to vote for a super scummy vote 2 would be equally scummy.

If someone is that "super scummy" should they be lynched with a vote 1 or should a vote 2 be attempted?

so who is the cheers/fraiser character who only critisises other peopel because it looks like fubb has some sort of restriction.

If somebody with cheers/fraiser experience could shed some light?

Why not just ask flubb for his rolename... or is that too suspicious?

 

[frozzzen1]

Dunno about second vote. It looks fairly useless to me; at beginning it's sometimes even hard to get standard lynch on person, especially if we don't have clear clue to who scum is so day ends up with no lynch. With 75%+ we need both scum and lurkers to vote, and just about anyone. Perhaps it might be useful to distinguish scum that doesn't really want to meld into town later in game when dealing with those "super scummy" cases, but even then it's likely that town:scum ratio won't be 1:3 for it to be reliable..

Also Thy, sticky this thread it's hard to find otherwise

 

[Malevolent]

I'm far from a cheers expert and it has been a long time since I watched it last, but I do think I have an idea about who glib could be.

then why don't you share it?

You seem to have oopsied.


Why not just ask flubb for his rolename... or is that too suspicious?

honestly the thought never occured to me. Why didnt you ask for his rolename instead of asking me that?

Flub who are you?

 

[FredOfErik]

then why don't you share it?


honestly the thought never occured to me. Why didnt you ask for his rolename instead of asking me that?

Flub who are you?

Because, as with pretty much all information, it can potentially be used by mafia. I have absolutely no reason to share my ideas about his role and I can't see any pro-town reason you would have to ask him for it.

Besides, I'm sure some of your scum buddies know enough about the lore to come up with some qualified guesses.

 

[coju]

Vote 2 - Who you think has "Had too much and needs to go home" IE Least useful poster

For Vote 2 - 75 % of the remaining alive players (rounded up) plus one need to vote for the same person. That person will then die at the end of the day.[/unquote]

From what it looks like, we can still Vote 2 - kill somebody, as d1's a townie usually gets lynched, and if it take 75%, mafia isn't likely to Vote 2 their own.... if you're picking up what i'm lying down

 

[flubbucket1]

then why don't you share it?


honestly the thought never occured to me. Why didnt you ask for his rolename instead of asking me that?

Flub who are you?

Well I'm not a character on the soap "The Scum and the Clueless."

Vote 2 - Who you think has "Had too much and needs to go home" IE Least useful poster

For Vote 2 - 75 % of the remaining alive players (rounded up) plus one need to vote for the same person. That person will then die at the end of the day.[/unquote]

From what it looks like, we can still Vote 2 - kill somebody, as d1's a townie usually gets lynched, and if it take 75%, mafia isn't likely to Vote 2 their own.... if you're picking up what i'm lying down

When did you get to be so smart??

 

[Malevolent]

Wait so you are accusing me of being scum when i dont ask who somebody is, then you say that asking somebody's role is scummy, Stop trying to set me up to look bad honestly it seems that every post i make gets picked out by soembody and i get big dirty fingers pointed at me. Would you rather i just posted useless stuff or lurked instead of trying to understand the game i am playing.Because the way this is heading it seems like a much better idea to stick my head in the sand and let other people do the hard work than trying to do some myself and being accused almost instantly for not asking a question and then asking it!

 

[flubbucket1]

...stick my head in the sand...

Oh now you're just baiting me aren't you.





Must....fight....urge....to....tell....where....to....stick....head....:banghead:

 

[Uraj]

Furthermore, vote 2 isn't just 75% for a lynch. The rules say 75% rounded up PLUS 1. That's 22 votes needed with 27 players in the game - pretty difficult to achieve. It's fairly rare to see "75% rounded up plus 1" players vote on D1 or any other day, let alone all vote for the same person.

I wonder if the plus one still refers to a voting lock and it just wasn't reiterated for that section. Regardless of which one, only with an investigation result would vote 2 likely be successful.

 

[Thyiad1]

Regards the 2nd vote. It is what it is. What you use it for is up to you.