Gods of Ancient Greece. Forum mafia game.

First of all, show me where I "pushed the issue" twice. From what I remember, I mentioned it (no1 else did, somehow) and then answered a question about it that someone asked.

About FoE.

It really does seem like he's faking misunderstanding on how the watcher role works. We did already go over this and explain it, after all.
 
Okay, you may be right, but that doesn't really exonerate you.

Meant to ask this yesterday.
Zokar, who do you think is town? If you already answered korial then I missed it.
Who do you think is scum?

@all, do we have any explanation of why there were no NKs?

Okay, first of all: don't you think someone would claim it if they wanted to? Like the person that possibly knows why is going to out themselves. This is hardcore role fishing.

@Pyro,

I was asking if anyone knew why there wasn't a kill. If someone has a plausible idea or something to say to prove someone is town (by saying they used 1-shot doc or something on someone) then it would be awesome to hear it.

No, you got it wrong. If I was mafia I would probably know why a kill wouldn't go through at this point.

I also don't have a read on kegs or pyro. They're both playing like they always do, as far as I can tell.

TBH, after the mix-up yesterday (with zokar's watch and everything) I feel like Zokar is more likely town than scum. Too many people wouldn't let up and ask other people questions (myself included) which to me is a bit of a signal that the person is town.

I'll probably vote FoE tomorrow, because I believe you are masons and it sounds like a reasonable idea.

That first paragraph is you changing your story from the above post.

Why would mafia probably know why there kill didn't work? If
 
Yes I do. What reasons do you have?

That was not what the question was. The question was "why does a town player need lynch immunity.' Answer is, they dont.

Wow, nice setup try. "If Z is town, I am too. Vote Z." when you know Z's alignment already. Brilliant.

On the above: I just thought that was funny, don't take it seriously. Someone else already mentioned the difference between watcher and tracker I think.

We will know a crapload more if Zokar is scum than we do now. Plus, you missed the obvious: we find out he is lynch immune. Ok, so these last two comments were just because I quoted the whole post.

Brilliant indeed. Well, it would be brilliant if someone other than him said it maybe.

I'm always suspicious of people who have already drawn conclusions about what it will look like if the person we are going to lynch is town.
 
Okay, you may be right, but that doesn't really exonerate you.



Okay, first of all: don't you think someone would claim it if they wanted to? Like the person that possibly knows why is going to out themselves. This is hardcore role fishing.



That first paragraph is you changing your story from the above post.

Why would mafia probably know why there kill didn't work? If

Is it equally hardcore rolefishing for people to speculate and ask for ideas on what happened on those nights that had 3 or 4 kills? I don't think so, and this is almost the same thing. Yes! Mafia would likely know most if not all of what happened on those nights. Likewise, at this point they probably know what can stop them from killing at this point, and who could do it.
 
Is it equally hardcore rolefishing for people to speculate and ask for ideas on what happened on those nights that had 3 or 4 kills? I don't think so, and this is almost the same thing. Yes! Mafia would likely know most if not all of what happened on those nights. Likewise, at this point they probably know what can stop them from killing at this point, and who could do it.

No, I don't think so. In that situation we are trying to speculate on what scum did, in your post you are trying to speculate what town did. If the act of preventing a nk doesn't prove someone is scum then it doesn't really need to be discussed.

So what do you think could prevent a nk at this point?
 
No, I don't think so. In that situation we are trying to speculate on what scum did, in your post you are trying to speculate what town did. If the act of preventing a nk doesn't prove someone is scum then it doesn't really need to be discussed.

So what do you think could prevent a nk at this point?
I see. Though mafia could have also just not sent in a kill, though I do realize that is quite unlikely.
Likewise, on the multi NK nights there is at least one death caused by someone who was probably townie.

My first thoughts are doc, jailkeeper or bullet proof.

Since I have internet at the moment I'll add my vote to FoE.

Vote: Fredoferik
 
So Zokar had a major slip with his N0 starting list. He later amended it and you really let him talk his way out of it? He mass posts to try to get his slip messages into the background and it seems to work. Unbelievable. I don,t say FoE is clean. I was suspicious of him also earlier, but I am far more sure that Zokar is scum. I begged my way to getting to use hubby,s work laptop. Will get it now and try to dig up the posts from Zokar since nobody else is willing to. Back in a bit.
 
So Zokar had a major slip with his N0 starting list. He later amended it and you really let him talk his way out of it? He mass posts to try to get his slip messages into the background and it seems to work. Unbelievable. I don,t say FoE is clean. I was suspicious of him also earlier, but I am far more sure that Zokar is scum. I begged my way to getting to use hubby,s work laptop. Will get it now and try to dig up the posts from Zokar since nobody else is willing to. Back in a bit.

LOL Seriously?????

It wasn't a slip. This is my second game. My first game started with N0 and I just assumed the same nomenclature would hold for this game. That is why I wrote it the way I did. I have no idea why you seem so bent out of shape over this. It just makes you look like you have nothing better to do than to try and make a case out of what amounts to absolutely nothing. But hey, if that's what works for you, go find the post and do your magic, I'll be here waiting.
 
While you're at it, you should probably look at the next post that TC made after I made the post you're referencing. He corrects me and I even quote him in my amended statement. Do you seriously think that if it was an actual meaningful slip on my part that TC would out me like that?
 
.... a little ambiguous.

Hey man, I'm straight! :nono:

But seriously..... I agree with moar. But I kinda doubt people that have a nightly night action are receiving their results in the format of N0, N1, N2, etc. so I can see where she is making something out of nothing on the other hand.

And for reference: we have gone back and forth on whether to use n0 or not many times over the games I've been in.

Her eagerness to not lynch foe has been noted though.
 
I can,t get the laptop to accept this forum. Probably because it,s a game forum. Bloody government issue laptop. :(

so I go from memory
Zokar said he would reveal who he watched with results except for the last one which he would reveal the result for the day after
Zokar posted a target and result list with 5 names and 4 results when we only had 4 nights, he started with N0
to me that means he claimed to already have watched target 5

when questioned about that and mod confirmed N1 start, he amended the list to say that 5th target would be the coming night,s target

That I call BS and scum slip.

Later somebody asked if "TBD" was to be decided which he readily agreed to while I mean he originally meant it to mean to be disclosed.
 
Back
Top