Also, my last post of the previous day phase was regarding gambor claiming to be vanilla after trying to get role cop, not that he claimed to have an already confirmed role.
Even though your drunk posting, I'll try to clear it up for you. Hider role was immune to all night actions every other night.
So
Night 1: I was immune
Night 2: I was not immune, BA stole my role
Night 3: BA was immune
Night 4: BA not immune. (Last night)
The SK most likely followed this timeline and took him out on the night he was vulnerable, and the first people to target would be solidly confirmed towns as they are very unlikely to be lynched and taking out someone uncertain would draw more attention to them during the day as there would be less people to suspect.
Other alternatives, BA was not the one that stole my role and therefore was never immune (possible but would mean that both TC and BA were lying which makes it near impossible, and wouldn't matter anyway due to the timeline above)
From flubbs last post it made it seem like he was the last mafia, and as far as we are aware, we have no one with an ability to avoid being night killed except the SK.
I will await further pushing on FoE until Gwaihir's post as that could prove or disprove a lot (maybe...).
I was sure BA was the hider role tonight? Since he was killed, he apparently was lying (again, alternatives?).
If he was lying about that, I'll assume he was mafia. Gwaihir will clear this up by tomorrow.
What's really interesting IMO - the thing that confirmed Pyro's claim was BA. If BA was lying, where does this leave Pyro?
I'm not in condition to figure this out atm. I will check the thread asap tommorrow.
Gwaihir: Laarz was Ninja, mafia.
You realize, of course, that if I wanted to lie about what role I went for, it would be impossible for anybody to counter-claim me. Since the way one would be caught there would be if someone lower in the order ended up with the claimed role. As such, a previously confirmed role wouldn't be of much value to me if I wanted to hide the role I went for. If we want to get all WIFOM about my claim I could point out that I claimed vanilla before it was established that there wasn't a watcher. I don't know what else to tell you, I asked for rolecop and it was taken.
One nk could be no scum left, or both sk and scum going after the same target.
Oh.. I just remember BA saying that he would be immune yesterday. I get why he would say that, though - he fooled me, an could've possibly fooled the SK aswell (which he obviously didn't, but you get my point).
Interesting. I got a slightly different result: role thief, mafia. I highly doubt Pyro and BA were lying, Pyro's explanation makes the most sense, that BA tried to bluff the killers. I also don't actually think you are lying - my bet is the difference comes from the fact you and Pyro acted at the same time and I acted a night later for roles.
I stand by my post from yesterday - Pyro and FoE can not be the SK based on claims I believe. coju and Val both claimed early, which would be a gutsy move for a SK, leaving Gambor or RE as the ones most likely to be a SK. Unfortunately voting history tells us nothing, it will be very hard to tell who the SK is.
He said he was immune and I knew he was bluffing when he said it but didn't call him on it because obviously it would stop a night kill which is obviously a good thing. The only thing is if the SK was keeping track of the cycle it was an easy one to catch.
It is impossible for anyone to counter-claim you which makes it all the more difficult, it was just one of those points of if its too convenient it probably is, all speculation of course.
I agree with the same target thing being possible but were up to 4 confirmed mafia with Gwaihir's confirmation, do you think its possible to have 5 and a SK? Seems like an awful lot.
The downside of that being that if there is a scum left then tomorrow is most likely town choosing which anti-town wins.