Batman - The Dark Knight Mafia Game

rather hilarious noodle and bad ash.

on the topic of interrogations, if we have EVERYONE interrogated once, wont that mean that the next day we are able to prosecute whoever we desire?

i think that EVERYBODY should do a self interrogation, this way we are not restricted by the rules and can get rid of 2 people tommorow with full information. I understand that self votes are not considered "sane" but it will make organising the whole process easier. However i will not do this yet, as i feel it could kill the conversation far too early in a 48 hour phase, but i think it is an idea worth considering.
 
In every game in which i've played that Noodle also played, Noodle sort of lurked his way through, so I can get on board with:

Interrogate: Noodle
 
Malevolent said:
i think that EVERYBODY should do a self interrogation, this way we are not restricted by the rules and can get rid of 2 people tommorow with full information. I understand that self votes are not considered "sane" but it will make organising the whole process easier. However i will not do this yet, as i feel it could kill the conversation far too early in a 48 hour phase, but i think it is an idea worth considering.
Click to expand...
Reading this I was confused.
Pyrotechnician said:
This will not interfere in anyway with the standard lynch during the first day phase.
Click to expand...
'till I reread this. Reading ftw... swear I read this twice before posting, but missed that there'd be (possibly) two deaths tomorrow.
 
Malevolent said:
rather hilarious noodle and bad ash.

on the topic of interrogations, if we have EVERYONE interrogated once, wont that mean that the next day we are able to prosecute whoever we desire?

i think that EVERYBODY should do a self interrogation, this way we are not restricted by the rules and can get rid of 2 people tommorow with full information. I understand that self votes are not considered "sane" but it will make organising the whole process easier. However i will not do this yet, as i feel it could kill the conversation far too early in a 48 hour phase, but i think it is an idea worth considering.
Click to expand...

Problem with this is that pyro said ties would only add more players to the prosecution list to a limit, which he didn't specify. So I think your idea is a waste. Also, possible connection to noodle?
 
Kudos to Pyro on this twilight mechanic. Again, lots of thought seems to have gone into it.

Just because of the crap that went on with him last (mini)game:

Interrogate: BPC
 
yup, we can potentially get 2 lynches tommorow, thats why i thought self interrogates would help to lift the restrictions, pyro said if there was a tie then both (or more) interogees(sp?) would be included, so we can have everone on the prosecution list tommorow if everyone has one interrogation vote
 
pharphis said:
Problem with this is that pyro said ties would only add more players to the prosecution list to a limit, which he didn't specify. So I think your idea is a waste. Also, possible connection to noodle?
Click to expand...

damn, didnt notice the limit part..... not sure how to work around that then, carry on folks, might just have to try and even our votes our between 3/4 people, hopefully we can keep our options open
 
Solar Ice said:
The group that do not like Day phases and discussion is the Mafia.
Click to expand...
no. You're wrong. Good effort trying to create a group of scum targets that you're not a part of though.

My views on twilight have nothing to do with this game, they've always been my views.

crawlingdeadman said:
I liked the Dragon Hunt last big game. This one seems to have a lot of thought behind it. If you're a player that will be prosecuted the next day, could it be thought that you have a lame duck immunity to NK? Since you have a greater chance of being hung the next day, would mafia bother NK?


One more I'd like to add:
What if both (or one in the case Gory asked about) players to be prosecuted the next day die during the night, will there be a regular day vote?
Click to expand...

Early introduction of the possibility of 2 night kills is noted.

crawlingdeadman said:
Reading this I was confused.

'till I reread this. Reading ftw... swear I read this twice before posting, but missed that there'd be (possibly) two deaths tomorrow.
Click to expand...

I didn't see it until you bolded it, and then you didn't even say what I expected!

Male says "get rid of" That sounds like something mafia would say about a townie.

Malevolent said:
yup, we can potentially get 2 lynches tommorow, thats why i thought self interrogates would help to lift the restrictions, pyro said if there was a tie then both (or more) interogees(sp?) would be included, so we can have everone on the prosecution list tommorow if everyone has one interrogation vote
Click to expand...

Pyro said there would be a limit, so I don't think your plan is a good one.
 
Noodle said:
Well, I'm trying to keep things civil. You might say I'm keeping myself on a short leash.
Click to expand...

If you want to keep things civil, you are barking up the wrong tree


kestegs said:
no. You're wrong. Good effort trying to create a group of scum targets that you're not a part of though.

My views on twilight have nothing to do with this game, they've always been my views.



Early introduction of the possibility of 2 night kills is noted.



I didn't see it until you bolded it, and then you didn't even say what I expected!

Male says "get rid of" That sounds like something mafia would say about a townie.



Pyro said there would be a limit, so I don't think your plan is a good one.
Click to expand...

This does not look like spam
 
Malevolent said:
rather hilarious noodle and bad ash.

on the topic of interrogations, if we have EVERYONE interrogated once, wont that mean that the next day we are able to prosecute whoever we desire?

i think that EVERYBODY should do a self interrogation, this way we are not restricted by the rules and can get rid of 2 people tommorow with full information. I understand that self votes are not considered "sane" but it will make organising the whole process easier. However i will not do this yet, as i feel it could kill the conversation far too early in a 48 hour phase, but i think it is an idea worth considering.
Click to expand...

made sense to me until i read further down about the limit mechanic.
 
Log in to Reply / Create Site Account
Remove Ads - Go PurePremium

Latest posts

Back
Top