23 Runeword Search Thread

Waiting for a hel to do storm. I've got a lum that I'm willing to try bone. Any thoughts on the spear / wand thing - 'bone' wand sounds kind of goofy to me, but you never know.
Dan
 
i have been working quite a bit so i didnt have a chane to try new runewords, but from what i jsut got a phone call for , well it might not be so good. i guess the servers went down all chars became ladder , godly stuff was muled, and Maybe , just maybe the new runewords were activated. i hope that didng happen. cause then really we would have to start all over. :scared:
 
Bone will be funny in wands or spears. "Bone" bone wand. Or the terrible pun bone spear. 100% chance to give charges or CTC bone spear.

As for the funky realm glitch. Can't think of a better time to test runewords than in the presence of a possible rollback.
 
Well, lets see.
In Armors:

OrtHel
TalShael
IthSol

all gemmed


Yea, so i don't really know why, but the idea of them resetting the ladder and newly activating the runewords intrigues me.
 
psyadam said:
I tested Law because I figured if it worked it would be an awesome shield. You probably think the same about the runeword you're eyeing, so by all means go for it!
Click to expand...

Did You test that on pally shield. THat would be my guess for shield implementation because of the name. LAW Myabe really Lem, AMn, Thul? I dont think Blizz as activated the runewords yet anyhow. LOL
 
Not much new to warrant respamming the various tables however I did want to report testing of 2 v1.07 runewords on the "other" forum.

Storm:
El Tir Hel Nef Tir
In a hammer and

Starlight:
Lem Nef Tir
In a sword

This leaves Pattern v 1.10 as the only lower level runeword left to test:
Dol - Ort - Eld - Shael - Thul
In any old 5 socket weapon
 
ToughE said:
Did You test that on pally shield. THat would be my guess for shield implementation because of the name. LAW Myabe really Lem, AMn, Thul? I dont think Blizz as activated the runewords yet anyhow. LOL
Click to expand...

Law was tested in a 4sk Superior Monarch
 
wathombe said:
but the question seems somewhat ludicrous.
Click to expand...

Being a video game developer, the question is completely valid. It obviously is trying to combine people's imagination with mathematical ability to try and figure out what numbers it could be. I will experiment a little myself and participate in that thread.

So far the most obvious thing to do is see if the range can be thought of as a binary number. It can not be:

-4,928,409,291 + 80,473,254 = 5008882546

5008882546/2 = 2504441273

I guessed the mean number, but i'm sure it's more complicated than that.
-2423968018.

So far I'm having trouble finding a number 2504441273 is divisible by. It would be significant if the number turned out to be a prime, as prime numbers become more rare the larger they are. I can create a program to see if it is. ~psy
 
psyadam said:
Being a video game developer, the question is completely valid.
Click to expand...

You're right. Sorry for my knee-jerk generalization.

Let us know what you figure out. I love number puzzles, but I prefer ones with a little more direction than "pick a number" and a range.

Some thoughts anyway:

--divisible by 23? no. 5008882545/23 = 217777501.9565...

--divisible by 33? no. 5008882545/33 = 151784319.5454...

(Also, doesn't -4,928,409,291 + 80,473,254 = 5008882545, not 5008882546? 4 + 1 = 5, yes? Am I missing something?)

Maybe somebody with more mathematical skill than I should factor it out?
 
I have taken alot of math including years of linear algebra and calculus. Also I can create programs to do mathematical tasks most humans can't. So if anyone has any ideas that even might require a program to do it, go ahead and post.

edit: for those who don't know I'm attending DigiPen Institute of Technology, the premier University for getting into the industry.
 
psyadam said:
So far I'm having trouble finding a number 2504441273 is divisible by. It would be significant if the number turned out to be a prime, as prime numbers become more rare the larger they are. I can create a program to see if it is. ~psy
Click to expand...

But 2504441273 isn't the right number, is it? (Not trying to be an argumentative prick here, I swear.)

Doesn't 4,928,409,291 + 80,473,254 = 5008882545, not 5008882546?

If so, this is how far I've gotten:

5008882545 / 5 = 1001776509

1001776509 / 3 = 333925503

333925503 / 3 = 111308501

Can't find anything that will go into 111308501 yet.
 
I said -4,928,409,291 + 80,473,254 = 5008882546

why did I choose 5008882546 as the number of possible values instead of 5008882545? Think about it.

edit: someone is spamming in that thread right now. I hope it gets resolved soon. I would report him but not sure if that's even possible.
 
Oh. Oops. It's inclusive, right? (EDIT: Wrong. We have to count zero, right?)

I cheated and found a website:

http://www.prime-numbers.org/

on which you can plug in a number and it will tell you if it's prime or not. This site states that 2504441273 is not prime. So far, the only Prime Factors sites I can find will only calculate up to 9 digits. Will keep looking.
 
I have already created a program that will help me find the prime factors of 2504441273. So far I have found that it is

23 * 108888751. The program I wrote has found that 108888751 is prime.

If you sum the numbers of 108888751 you get 46, which is twice 23.
 
Log in to Reply / Create Site Account
Remove Ads - Go PurePremium

Latest posts

Back
Top