Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

This is ridicilious. How much more do you want to get a lynch? If we end up in a no lynch after TC did so much to prove he should be lynched then we might aswell give up..
 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

TC's tenses slip (if that's what it was) doesn't add any certainty to his guilt in my eyes, but it increases my doubts.

To secure a lynch and the fact TC us not confirmed:

Unvote: Krazeyivan
Vote: ThunderCat


Sigh. I really am not up to this at the moment.
 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

The options were Feysal, Gorny and Laarz.

When did you perform your 'autopsy?' Why Feysal and not Laarz?

I guess I should mention that I'm currently of a mind to not vote for you, if that helps. You have a verifiable role, are active, and if true, I think your role will help unravel the mystery of the poisoning and killing of Feysal.



 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

Day has ended. Looking like another No Lynch.

Your thoughts focus on ThunderCat for most of the day, but you can't quite bring yourselves to lynch him. You head back up to your rooms for another night of hopefully peaceful rest.


It is now NIGHTTIME, you may not post for 24 hours. All those with night actions PM me ASAP.

Time until Day three start: Monday 23 @ 4 PM EST
 
Last edited:
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

He'd noticed his target liked to take walks before turning in for the night. So tonight he picked his perfect spot in the bushes and waited. Right on time his target appeared, he took aim, and fired his weapon three times. The sound from his weapon was almost inaudible compared to the loud thump as his target hit the ground.

Just then he heard the thundering of footfalls on cement and the raucous voices of a large group approaching. He slipped further into the shadows and waited for them to pass. However, when the group had passed, his target was no longer there. He followed the blood trail until it abruptly stopped. There was nothing to indicate which way his target had gone from there. But he reasoned that with the wounds his target had taken, he likely wouldn't remain among the living for long. To his dismay, he spotted his target the next morning, scraps of cloth creeping out from beneath his clothing. He'd have to try again another night.


It is now DAYTIME.

Players Alive:
1. Asrrin
2. CoolguyBad
3. Goryani
4. Noodle
5. Zarniwoop
6. ThunderCat
7. Marahumm
8. Bad Ash
9. Technomancer
10. Sathoris
11. Caluin Graye
12. Krazeyivan
13. Ankeli
14. LozHinge the Unhinged

With 14 Players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch someone and 8 votes to lock the lynch.
 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

My ability works only during the day. Thus I have the whole day to investigate whoever I see fit.
According to Valhaurs, a cityslicker is a plain townie. Which means there's more than one since the investigation on Feysal's body revealed him as a cityslicker also. I can either try to investigate Laarz or investigate Gorny and maybe reveal who he switched on night 1. Also keep in mind I mentioned my ability is more complex that what I've stated so far, and some parts of it have percentages.
Marahumm, who did you investigate last night?
 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

I was only paying attention to the early replies to my signal. I thought that once a couple had signalled and been noticed, further ones would be coat-tail claims, or potentially so. Not conclusive, but I don't believe KI has been acting for the Town.

Meant to ask this yesterday, but didn't get the chance:

Why do you feel it necessary to soft-claim as town when everyone should be claiming town at the very start of the game? To claim anything else would be considered anti-town and lynchable. So why bother, unless you're trying to make yourself look exceptionally good natured and fool us into thinking you're something you're not?

(Summary for anyone I confused: Only scum would soft-claim vanilla town on day 1.)



 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

My intention was to signal to players who may have similar roles to me. I could not do this in a completely obvious way, otherwise mafia may soft claim in the same fashion. So it had to be fairly subtle.

My aim was to try to establish a block of townies who were reasonably sure of each other's alignment, and also to catch anyone trying to join in under false pretenses.

Not a foolproof tactic, but worth a punt and you have to speculate to accumulate. It was not an attempt to simply claim town, but to establish a trusted group of townies.
 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

I feel slightly less crap today and my brain is working better than yesterday.

Speculative question:
If TC was mafia and had strangled Laarz, he would have known Laarz's role and thus could have set himself up with a fictitious "Coroner" role.
This isn't what has happened - he claims to have investigated Feysal and come up with a role. What's more, it is a role I have reason to believe is correct.

If someone is a "Poisoner" or whatever the role is, do they receive the victim's role info?

The answer to this will determine whether I choose to trust TC or vote him.
 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

Thundercat's claim is full of errors and I'm pissed off that we failed to lynch him twice because of people not voting.

1) In his first claim in post #303 he says he has a night abiltity. The subsequent role reveal of Feysal is just a copy of what Valhauros already confirmed as the townie role. Conveniently he couldn't get Leo's role. Killed by someone other than the mafia perhaps? (See point 2) He then later changes it to day a day ability in post #316

2) A mafia would have knowledge of the roles of their NK targets so TC can give us all valid info he obtained by killing the owners of the roles.

3) General scummy play which includes telling us to lynch the actives and let the lurkers live, threaten to vote Marahumm if Mara doesn't come up with a better target. Even though TC said he doesn't suspect Mara.

I'm all for a quicklynch. We've proven leaving it late will screw up any chance of a lynch so why not get the neccesary votes while we still can.

Vote: Thundercat
 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

but



Explanation?

A mistake I've made which I've explained later.


Sathoris, you're so blinded by your aggressiveness that I'm going to ignore any posts from you from now on. You're just too frustrating to argue with at this point. I've done my best to explain my point of view and you still won't hear it. Also, you claim to have read all my arguments, yet you failed to see my soft claim.

Now, once again, whose body should I examine? Gorny and maybe find out who he swapped on night 1, or Laarz?


 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

Sathoris, you're so blinded by your aggressiveness that I'm going to ignore any posts from you from now on. You're just too frustrating to argue with at this point. I've done my best to explain my point of view and you still won't hear it. Also, you claim to have read all my arguments, yet you failed to see my soft claim.

Thing is, you didn't explain anything properly. Let me find the point that you 'explained'.

Give us another target then, Marahumm. You know best that we need to lynch someone. If it's not you, who should it be?

First scummy play.

Very well Marahumm, but I will be expecting a valid lynch target from you.

Still upholding the play that you would lynch a claimed cop unless he gives you a better target.

So because I didn't find Mara suspicious and asked him to give us a better lynch target you're on my case? That comment was placed there since Marahumm had quite a few votes on him. But then again, lately you've been quite aggressive so I understand your train of thought.
Also, regarding the no scum hunting, you've played with me in other games quite a few times. Haven't you noticed that I don't really do much in the first few days of the game?

First 'explanation'. Does nothing to eleviate your scum play. Merely acknowledges that you didn't do any scumhunting. And you made that comment because he had a few votes on him only makes it worse. You're pressuring the guy who has votes to find a better target or you'll vote him. And with votes on him already he could very well get lynched, even though you didn't find him suspicious?

I didn't say I'll vote to lynch him if he doesn't come up with another target. I asked him for who he thinks a better target than him would be. And that was before I saw any kind of claim from him and before he noted that I missed his suspect list.

Trying to back out of your original statement. Even though you did threaten to vote for him if he didn't give you a better target:

If it's not you, who should it be?


 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

No TC, we REALLY need a lynch today. Two no lynches in a row, and you've been on the cutting block each time, AND your whole story has been chock full of errors. Of all the people I find scummy, you are top of my list. I was hounding Zarniwoop because of his motive for no lynches, but he's a saint compared to your play these past few days.

Vote: ThunderCat
 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

Still upholding the play that you would lynch a claimed cop unless he gives you a better target.

A number of us don't believe Mara was truthful when he claimed cop. I still find Mara scummier than the water that comes out of the taps in this backwater hotel.

ThunderCat said:
Just tell me what to investigate before lynching me.

Gorny, IMO, if you think you can learn who he swapped night one.



 
Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.

A number of us don't believe Mara was truthful when he claimed cop. I still find Mara scummier than the water that comes out of the taps in this backwater hotel.



Gorny, IMO, if you think you can learn who he swapped night one.

Gorny would be the worst choice IMO. We got his role by him and then again confirmed by uraj. This also adds a connection in with a lynch of TC because this is a very bad recommendation by you. It would prove nothing of TC's claim, absolutely zero and if he is lynched and show up anti-town you might be next on the block in my eyes.


I feel slightly less crap today and my brain is working better than yesterday.

Speculative question:
If TC was mafia and had strangled Laarz, he would have known Laarz's role and thus could have set himself up with a fictitious "Coroner" role.
This isn't what has happened - he claims to have investigated Feysal and come up with a role. What's more, it is a role I have reason to believe is correct.

If someone is a "Poisoner" or whatever the role is, do they receive the victim's role info?

The answer to this will determine whether I choose to trust TC or vote him.

Uraj told us Feysals role as well.

TC has backed himself into a corner here and IDK if theres anything you can say that'll gain my trust. A lot of misspeaking which is uncommon for you



 
Back
Top