Re: Ravenwood Retreat Mafia Game.
(since i can't edit. -.-)

(since i can't edit. -.-)
Is it just me, or are a LOT of players trying real hard to avoid using the "D" word. Most of those players have been quick to use the "D" word in past games' no-kill nights. Why not this game?
I am not against spying on whether players were active because it would give an advantage to one side, but because I think it is against the spirit of the game.
@Feysal - successful doctor most likely? Thats a pretty good guess by a doc with this many people in the game
This is the reason why I believe that a kill wasn't sent in and always will until given real facts in games with no first night kill. Obv. there are other options, but I play the odds.
Would there be any reason for the mafia members to purposefully skip the first kill? Would that actually be an useful strategy?
And Goryani, what "D" word are you referring to?
With 19 people, I would expect at least 3 factions. I'm really surprised that not a single thing happened. At least not a single fatal thing.
Suppose a simple townie did not visit the site during the night, because his role did not come with an action that would require him to?
I've never been in a game without one on this site.
For now, though I named a number of people believing the mafia missed their kill, my opinions of them differ.
Wow, I had too much drinkey and opening last night! Those should be reversed, lol!Anyway:
:wave: LoZ! *crosshairs*
:wave: Mara! *ducks*
You seem to be overlooking other posts verifying that a failure of a night 1 kill has indeed happened in past games.
Given that at the moment we have nothing else to work with, checking out profiles for inactivity could potentially give us a list of suspects. If it turns out everyone has logged in, we can pretty much rule out the idea that the mafia forgot to send in an nk and move on. Forgive me, sir, for trying to narrow down suspects.
@Feysal - successful doctor most likely? Thats a pretty good guess by a doc with this many people in the game
It's both rare and strange to see a NK in the first morning. Would there be any reason for the mafia members to purposefully skip the first kill? Would that actually be an useful strategy?
Assuming you meant "rare and strange to NOT see a NK..."
Not sending in a kill as a useful strategy should require a whole lot more knowledge than is available N1. To put it another way, if mafia already know enough to strategize not sending in a kill, then the town has a deep hole to climb out of. While I think it's more likely mafia intentionally not send in a kill than do so on accident, I can't imagine either happening N1. I would think they wait until a roleblocker is known and play the odds confuzzling the roleblocker.
Now that I have answered your question, I just thought I'd mention I asked a similar question my first game as mafia. Was the unvote too soon?
It seems that my subconscious must have voted TC while I was sleeping last night,must have been because of my desire to strangle him last gameyou could be right Mara but all that would give us is active or not active What would you do, lynch people that weren't active?
Oh good god, don't remind me about last game. I'm half tempted to vote TC based solely on that trainwreck.![]()
Thats also why I am going to vegas in 5 weeks to win me some WSOP money fools.
*dun dun duh...* Recruitment?
Since this is my first game here, asking questions is always good, no?=P
You seem to be overlooking other posts verifying that a failure of a night 1 kill has indeed happened in past games. Given that at the moment we have nothing else to work with, checking out profiles for inactivity could potentially give us a list of suspects. If it turns out everyone has logged in, we can pretty much rule out the idea that the mafia forgot to send in an nk and move on. Forgive me, sir, for trying to narrow down suspects.
On another note, passive-aggressive is my style. If you don't like it, I'll be happy to take into consideration other playstyles you might suggest.
*dun dun duh...* Recruitment?
My game didn't have a doc, though you were killed rather early in that one.
Do you believe any of the early posters intentionally avoided using the term doctor?
MEEEEOOOOOWWWW!!!
I overlooked nothing. In my experience, mafia are most easily caught by noting what they DON'T talk about. In this game, as I mentioned in post #18, a number of players chose to deviate from their own established gameplay to actively avoid using the term doctor. I'm convinced at least one is mafia but I would lay better than even odds more than one mafioso exists among those posting before Feysal.
Gorny is doing his best to be active but not mention anything game related. Same as last game. Sure you have on opinion about something, eh?
Unvote: Ankeli
Vote: Gorny
...so the chances that a power role prevented a kill are roughly 10%-12%...
Are you 100% sure about that?
Seriously now, this is Uraj's first game hosted in here. Which means we have no idea of what games he might host and which mechanics he might use. For all we know, he could have invented roles/mechanics that we can't even imagine at this point.
Seriously? Every game I've ever played with Gorny, and he's done this regardless of whether he is town or anti-town. To vote someone on such a flimsy read... Are you just trying to get rid of strong players? sounds scummy to me.
Unvote: Zarniwoop
Vote: Sathoris
I just personally think that my two idea are more likely.
Good luck dude. If you make it to the final table, you need to fly us all there in November to cheer for you.
/QUOTE]
OT: Haha I am not doing the main event...yet. I have enough for 2 smaller tournies, so when I win one of THOSE, THEN I'll win the main event woohoo /OT
As good as any really. A 5,25~% chance (math off the top of my head, may be off).
How do you reason that a kill not being sent in is more likely than a 5,25~% chance of a doctor save PLUS all the other possibilities Feysal listed, and another one that I'm adding to the list at the end of my post?
Faulty logic. I'll keep my random vote on you.
*dun dun duh...* Recruitment?
Because in games I have played in I have seen a missed opportunity more times than a N1 doc save. The other possibilities wouldn't leave us in the dark with no information and even a doc (sometimes) has some story mixed in which can arguably drop that number lower than 5%. I dont think you know how rare 5% is and we have inactive players almost every game.
Because in games I have played in I have seen a missed opportunity more times than a N1 doc save. The other possibilities wouldn't leave us in the dark with no information and even a doc (sometimes) has some story mixed in which can arguably drop that number lower than 5%. I dont think you know how rare 5% is and we have inactive players almost every game.