If the mafia, the vigilante, and the doctor target the same person in one night, that person still dies, and will still reveal a mafia member. When the vigilante kills someone, it will be from a gun, but you won't necessary be able to tell it apart from the mafia (they can use guns too), so I won't tell you outright that it was a mafia murder or a vigilante kill.Suppose the mafia kill is prevented, but the Vigilante decides to kill that person or someone else. Will we be told that it was an ordinary kill or that the Vigilante made the kill?
What happens if the vigilante or the mafia decides to kill someone, the doctor decides to save that same person, and the other party of vigilante and mafia decides to kill the doctor? I assume the doctor will be killed, but is that before or after (s)he saves the other person?
Will the witness ID the vigilante if such an instance should come up?
Sorry my question wasn't clearly worded. If the vigilante is the only one to target the witness, will the witness ID the vigilante as their killer. I guess the rules are pretty clear on this, but I just wanted to double check.
Before. Basically, all the roles happen if they can, with the mafia actually murdering someone coming lastest during the night.If the cop investigates someone targeted by either the mafia or the vigilante, will (s)he do so before or after the murder?
No, unfortunately the cop is quite useless at preventing crime. The cop seems only to be good at snooping around.Will (s)he be able to witness or prevent the murder?
No one will see anyone, and both abilities will work.If the doctor also targets the same person that night, will the cop see the doctor arrive? Who gets there first, the cop or the doctor?
Nothing wrong at all. I'm sure they will be able to guess fairly easily who is the crooked detective anyway.On another note, the crooked detective needs to keep his/her role secret from the other mafiosi, at the same time, those other mafiosi can easily suggest someone to take into protective custody (I say protective since that person can neither be murdered by the mafia nor be lynched by the mob). Is there anything wrong with other mafiosi suggesting such a course of action? (without knowing who of them is the crooked detective)
Thats a good idea for future games, but if you are a mason, you have no other ability and you are on the towns side.Are the masons only masons who can talk with each other during the night or could one of them theoretically have another role? (might be well clear in the rules, but I don't see them since I'm sending this message)
I did tell the witness they are the witness. And once again, they only have that role. The witness is on the towns side.The witness doesn't know (s)he is the witness, right? Also, can the witness have another townie role (I assume the witness cannot be mafia), or is it one of the people who is not cop, doctor, mason, or vigilante?
Correct. Also, I will not be telling you when the village idiot is killed, nor will they. If they do get lynched, the game will continue for second place, then you will know the identity of this great mafia player.If the village idiot is killed, but not lynched, (s)he loses, right?
But if that's the case, how can the doctor ever save someone whom the mafia attempted to kill? If the vigilante tries to kill the doctor, the mafia tries to kill the vigilante and the doctor tries to save the vigilante, what happens in what order? Of course one could say that the vigilante acts last, but (s)he is probably in no condition to act at that moment. Trying to kill the doctor just when (s)he is bandaging the wounds of the vigilante seems a bit far-fetched (the vigilante had decided to kill the doctor, but at that moment knows the doctor is not mafia since (s)he had already been visited by the mafia and the mafia only gets to act once a night), though the only thing that makes sense from a linearly temporal point of view.Before. Basically, all the roles happen if they can, with the mafia actually murdering someone coming lastest during the night.
But if that's the case, how can the doctor ever save someone whom the mafia attempted to kill? If the vigilante tries to kill the doctor, the mafia tries to kill the vigilante and the doctor tries to save the vigilante, what happens in what order? Of course one could say that the vigilante acts last, but (s)he is probably in no condition to act at that moment. Trying to kill the doctor just when (s)he is bandaging the wounds of the vigilante seems a bit far-fetched (the vigilante had decided to kill the doctor, but at that moment knows the doctor is not mafia since (s)he had already been visited by the mafia and the mafia only gets to act once a night), though the only thing that makes sense from a linearly temporal point of view.
My relativity theory is a bit rusty, but it might give some solution here. Different frames of reference give a different order of events, so what might look like first the vigilante kills the doctor, then the doctor saves the vigilante, and then the mafia attempts to kill the vigilante in one frame of reference, might make perfect sense in another.
The best way to think about it is that everything happens if it can, there is no order of precedence of night activities, but some may make others irrelevant come the following morning. The person the doctor selects is immune to one attack. It's a game, the rules aren't trying to be ultra-realistic. In the case above, the doctor dies and the vigilante lives. (Note: this is my interpretation from live games, skoolbus's interpretation may be different)
In a case where the vigilante and the last mafioso target each other, they both die (and the town wins heh...).
WTF? :shocked: How can we begin the game if there is no sign of a bloodthirsty mafia gang looming behind our necks? Feels a tad lame to lynch somebody today, imho.
This goes way beyond my sense of logic. What use is it to the mafia if nobody gets killed? Were they sleeping the last 40 or so hours? They could have just randomly picked out some townie to be murdered, this just insane.
It could also be that they're just trying to confuse us.