Good one :flowers:stoutewolf said:if u try to brag with items you dont have plz make them look possible:wink3:
Good one :flowers:stoutewolf said:if u try to brag with items you dont have plz make them look possible:wink3:
BotD beats that so hard...Someone posted it on another forum. I didn't think this was even remotely possible.
absorb cold? mf more than possible? dex and str amounts that require level 50? can you say fake?
What thegiantturtle is saying, honey, is that that amulet cannot exist :\i got it from some guy who said he was quiting diablo. I was amazed too, but its true. He also gave me ebotd 414, AP Nigma and a a lot more. I was pretty excited!
Show it to me in game and I'll believe it. *ionlyliveonceViperSlay said:it exists, im using it this second. I could beleive anything about it either. I showed some other guy and he said it wasn't possible either. He believed me cause he saw it.
nickedoff said:BotD beats that so hard...
I'm not showing off a BotD, dearheart, just that 'I didn't even know this item could exist' is easily fixable by mentioning a mainstream runeword that shows the mods on this item; a lot of IAS, high % ED, and etherealism (etherealness?)Rofl, botd beats a lot of weapons. I'd still pick the rare gt over 5 botd's. Besides this is supposed to be a rare items showoff-thread
I don't see what needed to be fixed, but in any case, runewords don't follow the rules that rares though, so pointing out a runeword has mod x, y, and z doesn't mean a rare can have those same mods. Think of exile...not many rares have a defiance aura and a chance to cast lifetap.nickedoff said:I'm not showing off a BotD, dearheart, just that 'I didn't even know this item could exist' is easily fixable by mentioning a mainstream runeword that shows the mods on this item; a lot of IAS, high % ED, and etherealism (etherealness?)
Mm, I was thinking in a different manner when I typed that, forget my postI don't see what needed to be fixed, but in any case, runewords don't follow the rules that rares though, so pointing out a runeword has mod x, y, and z doesn't mean a rare can have those same mods. Think of exile...not many rares have a defiance aura and a chance to cast lifetap.
That's C:\Program Files\Diablo II if you used the default.then the pic will come to your d2 folder.
BotD beats that so hard...
Hmm.I'm not too sure whether you guys seen this before. This is for certain legit as it went for (many) high runes on some other trade forum.
However, you can't have +cold absorb on an amulet - so yours still can't existHere is proof 47% mf can exist on an ammy. Its really close to mine
Since you've obviously learned how to take screenshots, why didn't you do one for your amulet? hmm?...ViperSlay said:Here is proof 47% mf can exist on an ammy. Its really close to mine
http://www.imagehosting.us/index.php?action=show&ident=1325845
Heres a good gc I just found.
http://tinypic.com/view/?pic=wjjcci
Hmm. The suffix 'of Luck' can give up to 25% mf, and the 'Felicitous' prefix gives up to 10%, these can both spawn on rare. In the current patch (but I think 1.08+ actually) I think a rare amulet can't go better than 35%. I suppose the amulet comes from before 1.08. I may have owned a 45ish mf rare amulet back in classic, but I really can't tell for sure. I'd say that a 47% mf cannot exist in Ladder.ViperSlay said:Here is proof 47% mf can exist on an ammy. Its really close to mine.