Interesting, unfortunately it is your word against mine and we have no proof either way. Other than the fact that CGB died last night and you apparently investigated him.
Like all investigators that out somebody, the play is to kill the person who is outed as scum. If they flip scum (or zombie, in your case) that reinforces that the investigator is telling the truth. If the outed person flips town, then the next person to go is the claimed investigator. If Bad Ash is lying, we'll know it at the end of the day and he goes tomorrow.
First point: Not surprised given how much you want to trust BA like I demonstrated yesterday
Second point: I didn't realise you wanted me to investigate you.
When testing an investigator you lynch the person they out as scum.
Also, how could you not realize I put myself out to be tested when I said "I'll submit to the Jcakes test" in a post quoting you?
Third Point: TIME ZONE - My last post was at 10PM, the next post was at 1AM (I went to bed just before then), I got up at 7am (day ends at 7:30 am for me) checked to see if we had a lock and/or if a train hand changed 0 time for any comments, but nice trying to make me look scummy cos of my time zone .....
I didn't say anything about your time zone.
Again this all assumes that BA is telling the truth.
If he's not, we kill him tomorrow. With 4 dead anti-town (counting CGB) and a dead neutral, you really think BA is looking to trade his life for yours?
Can you please explain are so called gutsy play? The way I see what you are thinking is our gutsy play is the following
1. DJ claims zombie giving up
2. CGB and I claim zombie medic and zombie investiagor
that's a plan........ If I was a zombie and was on the same team, the better play would be for me to claim to investigate DJ reveal him as Zombie and gain town points. What you are stating that a zombie team did made absolutely no sense.
I don't know why your team played it the way you did, but what I do know is that DJ was a zombie, CoolGuyBad claimed to be able to cure zombies but in fact was a zombie, and you claimed to have investigated him and said he wasn't a zombie. Talking about what would have been "the better play" is sheer WIFOM. At the end of the day CGB was lying and you vouched for him, which puts the crosshairs squarely on you.
The most amusing part of your defense is that you're attacking the wrong person. I believe Bad Ash when he reports CGB was a zombie because I don't see any reason he would trade himself for you. Since you claim your mechanic works by people quoting you, any zombie can simply avoid quoting you so you present absolutely zero danger to anti-town if you're telling the truth. If Bad Ash were scum and was going to get us to kill someone with fake info, why would he pick
you? It makes no sense.
Your response just cements your guilt. Instead of questioning the person who outed you, you chose to come after me because you know if you make it a choice between Bad Ash and you, you're going to hang.
But yes, absolutely better targets out there. Although I guess the obvious targets would only give them, at best, a 67% chance of killing someone. If they go outside that set of possible targets, they're pretty likely to hit. It's either a desperate move, or a very confident one. Either they're so close to winning they can afford to let doctors, role cops, and vigilantes run around in exchange for certain kills, or they're so close to losing they can't afford to fail.
If Moar, BA, or Laarz are scum, then I'd think the former, because then everything we think we know is wrong. 
I tend to view with skepticism investigations that occurred on people who are conveniently now dead and thus cannot respond. Luckily for us though, if we kill Jcakes we'll know right away if we can trust that particular result...as i was saying before though, that still doesn't mean you're town.