Fair call, but could you atleast answer my question and tell me who you think are mafia? It feels to me you are trying to distract town from discussions about mafia to discussions about Zombies.
We have zombie to kill and fracturing ourselves over who to kill tomorrow doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. I'm kind of hoping that BA will ferret out another scum or zombie for us to kill honestly.
You have asked me several times for who I think might be scum, and given the number of people alive it's obvious that somebody isn't being honest (big shocker, amirite?). Let me borrow your list from post #1186:
1. Laarz-doc Carolyn Lam (SG1)
2. Bad Ash-role cop Bates (Atlantis)
3. djmbbandie-zombie No Name
4. flubbucket- Post Restriction - Tealc (SG1)
5. AnnualAntAnswers- VT - Major Lorne (Atlantis)
6. CoolguyBad-medic(zombie curing) - Tamara Johansen (SGU)
7. Jcakes - Zombie Finder - Daniel Jackson (SG1)
8. Moar - ascends if lynched, town - Rodney McKay (Atlantis)
9. Drixx-vt - Paul Emerson (SG1)
10. korialstraz-android guy, town - Harlan (SG1)
11. IWantToUseNumbersInMyName-vig - Ronald Geers (SGU)
We don't know which anti-town faction killed on which night, so there's some limitation to what kind of reasonable estimates we can make on remaining anti-town. I would suspect anywhere from 2-4. From that list the following I think we can consider 100% confirmed:
Laarz - Doctor
DJ - Zombie
After that we're into taking people at their word territory. Moar was pegged as townie by a BPC investigation, but Moar also claims to not actually have an alignment right now and will ascend upon death (or maybe just lynch?). Could be a godfather read from BPC, so there's enough inconsistency that we can't even really put Moar in the confirmed category.
Numbers claimed vig, and probably actually is vigilante, but we've seen vigilante as scum before, so believing his claim doesn't necessarily put him town.
Flubbucket claims to be a major character with an odd post restriction, which would scream scum to me if it wasn't for CG also having a negative only role (that we know of ... it's possible there's more he kept hidden that we didn't see).
AAA has given us his name and I believe claimed vanilla. (you have him as such on your list, but I didn't go re-read to check). Possible scum.
CBG played a lot of follow the leader this game then suddenly when a zombie shows up and makes a really odd claim today decides to claim he can cure zombies ... but only some of them ... and he has no idea if it works or not. Suspect claim. Possible scum.
Jcakes is you, and you claim to be a major character and a zombie finder, but the way you describe your role working makes me think you should have been posting a lot more so that people would quote you a lot more. Claim doesn't quite line up with how you've played the game. 50/50 on you atm. I would have leaned more town but your response to my vote on you has been a bit over the top.
Drixx is me, and I gave my name and have no ability. Anything I say in my defense is WIFOM so I direct you back to my gameplay and invite you to make your own mind up.
Korialstraz was able to make someone into a robot (claimed a one shot). Used the ability on BPC which earns townie points, but the role itself isn't necessarily something that has to be townie. We've seen scum use their roles to benefit town to get strong town cred before. I'd say 75-80% sure Korial is town though.
I hope that was thorough enough for you?
Why skeptical one way and not the other?
I went through much the same mental process when I considered BA's claim as I did when I was considering BPC's, only I didn't put a stream of consciousness post in the game when I did so. I believe it was Laarz who pointed out that when I make a post thinking through someone's claim, I'm really just covering ground most everyone else does on their own. Me taking solid advice on playing better does not mean I stopped evaluating claims from a position of skepticism.
Here is the thing, you were skeptical of BPC, yet when BA claims you appear to take everything he says at face value and instantly defend him / attack me for questioning him. That doesn't seem odd to you?
I've already responded to this accusation on your part. That you ignored my response and just made the same accusation again doesn't make me any more apt to believe you. I attacked you for your convenient claim that doesn't line up with your play and for what I saw as a poor case against BA's claim that was easily shot down. I gave a simple counter to your argument against his claim simply to demonstrate that it was flawed.
You have mistaken my response to you trying to get a train going on anyone besides DJ as a defense of BA rather than what it is: an attack on your play. The only smart move today, in the absence of any other known scum, is to kill the scum we do know and let tomorrow be tomorrow. As I pointed out above, the vast majority of the claims in the game right now are suspect.
Compare the two responses to a cop claim. In one case (where the cop reveals two anti-town people) you go through all the different scenarios before voting. In the second cop claim you take everything he says for granted and then when I point out it is possible mafia have an investigator and how it could you immediately come to his defense. It just seems odd that you'd be a little suspicious of one cop claim and the other one later in the game (who provides no info to prove his case) you immediately believe ..... IDK just seems a little bit contradictory to me.
See above. I was told that it wasn't really necessary for me to walk step by step through my thoughts on someone's claim since most people evaluate claims on their own. In fact, that post I made thinking through the BPC claim got me quite a few scum points. Ironic that I changed and did my thinking without posting my thought process, and the lack of a long post weighing the claim is now viewed as scummy.
Go Go wall of text!
Also, as far as your reason for not posting a lot earlier to use your ability, I have no comment on your reasons. The game is the game and life is life. I am sorry to hear that you've become unemployed though.