Gods of Ancient Greece. Forum mafia game.

IIRC, you haven't unvoted for Pyro yet. Although now it doesn't matter.

I am always confused when Moar claims and usually don't know what to think as her actions go against what I feel about the scenario. Either way, she is locked now, so we at the very least gain some truth from it.

I don't think I have 11 votes yet. So you might want to vote for me.
 
In my experience, scum try to dodge hard questions and avoid putting them out there. The two OT questions were given as an option for Leo to dodge the main question. Sort of like concealing her thoughts amidst a large pile of OT chaff. Leo is the queen of this practice, though others are capable of it too.

Since Leo answered directly and used terminology I associate with town, then I came away with the impression that she simply has a gut read on Laarz.

This post gets a thumbs up. :thumbup:
 
This isn't you. You just don't perceive a treestump that way, having played in the games you have, for example the Half Life game. I was convinced you're a townie before this post. Now I'm quite certain that you're mafia, but I doubt we can get enough votes on you and hence will save voting for you for tomorrow.

Actually, I do. How can that be? I don't consider roles like G-man to be treestumps. I'm THAT pedantic.
 
@ Gory
You are playing very different from how you did the last games where you were town. I think you are scum this game. You never make comments like that "BM" comment when you are seriously scum hunting. You haven't asked me a question after I claimed, I think, and that is so typically not you. You haven't voted for me either. Is that because you are afraid that I will turn out not lynchable? And that might hurt your mafia team? The way you act this game is just not how you are when you are town and hunting the scum.
 
What type of question is that? She did and that's we're voting her.

It's one thing to vote to lynch Moar because it appears no other lynch will happen and we might as well test her claim. It's quite another thing to vote to lynch Moar because you think she is scummy. Most of your post 279 avoids placing you in either camp but the part I underlined might imply you think the latter. I want to know if that read is accurate or not.
 
I see your vote on CG as a OMGUS vote, he pushed you and you reacted to it, I know how much you hate lurkers but you dont seem to be going after them this game:scratchchin:

Your first on topic post of the day! Congratulations! Someone get this man a prize.

Yes.



I wouldn't say Pyro or kegs "caught the reference" specifically because of the underlined sentence. I was curious how you knew they knew about Joxer since neither appeared to know this in the thread.



Had I any Gory-treats to give you'd have mine.

I don't remember saying if I did or did not remember Joxer specifically, I only said that they were quoting Xena episodes and that I didn't see how that related to trust.

I'm not down with a Laarz lynch. Post 2 says he has 1 vote but I swear I remembered more votes on him and players talking about him.

Anyone have an updated vote count?

I think there was much more talk then there were votes.

What if Moar is only invulnerable for today? What if we vote for her, she flips immune, then what? It could have been a temporary thing just for the day, provided by her team. A lynch on her today (imo) doesn't prove anything useful for the long term evaluation of her role. On the other hand, her proving that she can't vote every single day seems to be a better route... though I admit that does not peg her to a particular team/alignment. My suggestion, don't lynch her today. Verify her votes are null and if she's playing or reading as scum then lynch her on that and that alone. This will make it difficult for scum to protect her assuming they can or actually are.... yes i know, more wild theory/speculation/etc. But, as it stands, I don't see a vote for Moar to be particularly useful.

So pretty much there are multiple possibilities to her claim, and apparently attempting to lynch her is the direction we have decided to take. What do you think is most likely to happen tomorrow since she is being lynched today?
 
this.

Raxy, I love ya, but letting other people answer/cover the things you have questions about it not good, at least for Town side. Your thoughts are just as important and Town always needs as much particpation as possible, even if it is repetitive.

(Damn, I think Mara taught me a lot and I didn't even know. Hm. :cloud9:)

Cal, I didn't take that offensively. You're fine.

Z, while I do find your argument... idk. Useful? Insightful? Something? Any lynch is better than no lynch, even if it is wasted. If Moar lives to see tomorrow, we know she was telling the truth.
Yea, that last line is really disturbing. Looks like you're setting her up *** confirmed townie after today because you know what's going to happen already.

Damn....you guys post a lot!

Not seen an official vote count so:

vote: Moar
 
Don't know if she's locked or not yet, but obviously that's the only thing happening today. May as well add on in case she's not already there.

Unvote: Laarz
Vote: Moar
 
So pretty much there are multiple possibilities to her claim, and apparently attempting to lynch her is the direction we have decided to take. What do you think is most likely to happen tomorrow since she is being lynched today?

I haven't counted the votes, so I don't know for sure that she's locked, but assuming she is, then...

Out of the possibilities that I listed and some that I didn't bother listing, my guess is that she flips immune today and we learn nothing concrete other than for at least today she was immune. We don't know if it's a permanent thing, a temporary thing, something she controls, something somebody else controls, something random, or some combination of the above or something entirely different I haven't thought about.

Of course, she could be playing us all... *shrugs*
 
If TC is no bastard mod, I won't be lynched tonight. Tomorrow (mafia day) my vote won't count. I can write "vote: somebody" but it will not be counted. So I will do just that. I'm really travelling on early Saturday morning and I have never tried to post here from my Ipad. I will do so though if I go to bed before the new day is up. (laptop will be packed then) I'll just vote somebody when I am at the airport. You'll see that it isn't counted.
 
Her. Not a big thing though.

Ahh sorry. I should've picked up on it already, but I guess I was on auto-pilot. Sorry.

What if Moar is only invulnerable for today? What if we vote for her, she flips immune, then what? It could have been a temporary thing just for the day, provided by her team. A lynch on her today (imo) doesn't prove anything useful for the long term evaluation of her role. On the other hand, her proving that she can't vote every single day seems to be a better route... though I admit that does not peg her to a particular team/alignment. My suggestion, don't lynch her today. Verify her votes are null and if she's playing or reading as scum then lynch her on that and that alone. This will make it difficult for scum to protect her assuming they can or actually are.... yes i know, more wild theory/speculation/etc. But, as it stands, I don't see a vote for Moar to be particularly useful.

If you read my post again, I mentioned that being unlynchable doesn't equal confirmed town. I didn't include all the possible reasons, since I expected people to know that. Or if not then at the very least ask why that wouldn't confirm Moar.

Unlynchable mafia is BM and I don't expect that in this game.

Yes but didn't TC host both SG games? IIRC from that game, there was 2 lynch immune anti-town. So I wouldn't put it past him.

Slight tangent: phone posting is literally the worst thing ever.

+1!!! I hate typing from my phone, especially on forums. I can never place the "cursor" where I want it. And even when I tap spot on, it just jumps to some random place afterwards, making it impossible to correctly format posts.

I do tend toward lurking as generally most of the questions I have are already/better covered by someone else so I don't see much point in repeating them.

I have the exact same feeling, but it seems that is looked down upon, so I try my best regardless to be active and pose questions.

IIRC, you haven't unvoted for Pyro yet. Although now it doesn't matter.

I am always confused when Moar claims and usually don't know what to think as her actions go against what I feel about the scenario. Either way, she is locked now, so we at the very least gain some truth from it.

You're right, I was about to log on to D3, and forgot to unvote.

Unvote: Pyrotechnician
Vote: Moar


Putting these two quotes together. Ok, I get the part where you don't want to "hurt" the "side" that you are on, but in actuallity by stating multiple times that you are trying to be cautious doesn't make it sound like the side that you are on is the towns side. By proclaiming that your trying to be catious its like saying that you are conciously making an effort to not be caught. This then leads me into my second question, which was what you would consider to be a major screw up. It was directed toward getting a reponse specifically for this game, however I did expect you to say something along the lines of the above (wouldn't want to put the town in a worse position yada yada), your actual response is however much more interesting because instead of coming out with the standard response you essentially all around avoided the question and referenced previous scenarios almost as if you don't want to seem like your town or mafia in this game. I'm not quite sure what to make of it, but it was in no way expected.

Didn't see this first time around.

Ohh... I see what you mean now, especially considering the bolded part. Well I guess since you've explained it now, it won't matter if I answer the question again or not. I'll stand by my statement though, since that's actually how I feel when playing. But you are partly correct in your assumptions though. When playing mafia, my motive for being careful is to avoid being caught (duh?). As town I want to avoid getting myself killed, since if nothing else I can contribute with a town vote, or hopefully using a power rule in a smart way if I recieve one. For what it's worth, I'm trying my best to help the town this game.

Thank you so much for that post, I'll definitely take this with me into future games. :)
 
I think she's probably VI.

I don't think she would have given in and wanted proof of her being lynch-immune after the heat she got last game for that behaviour. she also gave us a strange (3/4ths Treestump? lol) claim to draw attention. Lynch D1 wincon? Maybe
 
I haven't counted the votes, so I don't know for sure that she's locked, but assuming she is, then...

Out of the possibilities that I listed and some that I didn't bother listing, my guess is that she flips immune today and we learn nothing concrete other than for at least today she was immune. We don't know if it's a permanent thing, a temporary thing, something she controls, something somebody else controls, something random, or some combination of the above or something entirely different I haven't thought about.

Of course, she could be playing us all... *shrugs*
I gave it the ol' college try and counted 9. As Korz's vote does not count yet.

What we do learn, is that moar is at least lynch immune for one day. I do agree with Gory that having a lynch immune scum is not in good taste. It would be the opposite of a bastard role (er, overpowered?). That doesn't prove she's immune for one day or all days, or if she's town or neutral.
 
If TC is no bastard mod, I won't be lynched tonight. Tomorrow (mafia day) my vote won't count. I can write "vote: somebody" but it will not be counted. So I will do just that. I'm really travelling on early Saturday morning and I have never tried to post here from my Ipad. I will do so though if I go to bed before the new day is up. (laptop will be packed then) I'll just vote somebody when I am at the airport. You'll see that it isn't counted.

Why not just vote yourself?
 
Back
Top