Gods of Ancient Greece. Forum mafia game.

[Moar]

She has posted after my question, so I doubt we will get an answer.

 

[korialstraz]

don't most people?

I don't know, do they? That's an honest question btw. To me when I read through a poke/prod/defend/counter-poke conversation, that those who are good at it can easily defend their viewpoints (unless caught in a direct lie). Basically casually shrugging off pressure. I feel like a babbling fool. -.-

I completely forgot Frankie made any posts. Thanks for the reminder!

My thoughts? BA has been a little too quiet. Ank has his usual playstyle. And as for the Gory and Cakes, they both make interesting points. Right now, they are on the same level of suspicion.

My pleasure.

BA has been quite? I seem to recall from the games I played (granted those feel like ages ago), he used to be very quite in games. Doesn't seem off to me, but I'm playing with outdated information so to speak.

who is SA?

I meant Solar Ice, or SI for short. But I'm sure you figured it out, since you've read up to the point where I noticed my misstake and corrected it.

*light toss of the bottle of aspirin*

I tend to reply in the order i quote things. It was another nod to your posts about scheduling.

Thanks. =)

I'll keep that in mind. Sometimes I feel it's a bit difficult to... make sense(?) of your post, this would explain it perfectly. Not sure if that's the best way to describe it, but I can't think og anything better atm.

 

[Solar Ice]

You read it wrong. I was pointing out that the only way for sure Leo could know Laarz is trustworthy is if Laarz is not on her team. In other words, I was calling Leo scum.

You were not calling her scum, not the way you structured that sentence and the succeeding sentences. You went straight for any information you could get about her role, with a disguise of placing two comparatively insignificant questions in the same paragraph.

Didn't you react to her statement that she knows to trust Laarz and then felt to trust him? I certainly did. I can think positive or negative about folks here, but I wouldn't say I know to trust them unless I'm really sure. So a moderated "I feel" statement after an "I know" makes me suspicious and I ask a question or two. She hasn't answered either, yet.

Would you say that it would be beneficial to the Town if she explains in detail your question?

 

[Moar]

Would you say that it would be beneficial to the Town if she explains in detail your question?

Her answer would make me either peg her scum or town and I believe others would do that as well. So yes, it woud benefit town. We'd get more iformation about her interaction with Laarz.

 

[Moar]

And I didn't ask about details. I just wanted to know why it was "know" at first and then "feel" afterwards.

 

[Caluin Graye]

You were not calling her scum, not the way you structured that sentence and the succeeding sentences. You went straight for any information you could get about her role, with a disguise of placing two comparatively insignificant questions in the same paragraph.

Please don't try to put words in my mouth. At worst it's insulting to me, and at best it's only unbecoming of you. They are my words and I phrased them in a specific way to get a specific reaction out of Leo. The two seemingly insignificant questions may appear that way to you, but they had a very specific purpose to which they fulfilled admirably. I can't help if you can't see beyond your own preconceptions, but don't you dare try to tell me what I did and did not mean to say with my words.

 

[FredOfErik]

So assume leo and laarz are really both town and connected in someway via PRs. Why on earth would you want two town PRs to reveal information about their interactions to everybody, including anti-town? If they are both anti-town, why do you think they would give a useful answer? It is a completely pointless question - unless you are anti-town looking for information on possible town PRs.

My vote stands.

And for the record, I don't see the point of leo's claim about trusting laarz, but I also have a hard time seeing it as a scum move.

 

[Solar Ice]

And I didn't ask about details. I just wanted to know why it was "know" at first and then "feel" afterwards.

I most certainly read that as asking for details. "Either you know or you feel which is it?" A player may "know" not only because they are Scum. I do not believe that you did not think of this when you asked your questions. It also means that you did not feel that her answer in post #67 is satisfactory and went digging for more. Then shrug off the -in my view- blatant rolefishing as being a "question or two" because you are suspicious.

 

[Kestegs]

why Pharphy, Kegs? refresh my wise mind.

His "joking" post about killing gwaihir.

Also, you think both Jcakes AND Sath? Why?

Should probably have classified that. I kinda doubt they are both scum, but it's possible. I understand the case that gory brought against cakes, but I don't like the way Sath went about what he did as I said earlier. I look more at why someone voted for a person rather than who they vote for.

And I didn't ask about details. I just wanted to know why it was "know" at first and then "feel" afterwards.

What did you think the answer to that question was going to imply? You were hardcore rolefishing there.

 

[Moar]

Oh please! I give up on getting information from Leo. A town and mason Leo would never have made the "get off his back" statement with just one vote (mine) on him. Well, that's what I think anyway. I still want to know why she first says "know" then "feel". What I really react to is CG not even mentioning the mason possibility.

And I am looking at those voting for me as well. You seem to hop on a thing there. Not realizing that Leo or any mason would not ever have tried to save a mason buddy so early.

 

[Solar Ice]

I can't help if you can't see beyond your own preconceptions, but don't you dare try to tell me what I did and did not mean to say with my words.

Post # 163 I meant no offence and apologise if any is caused.

But now you are implying that I should take everything that you say at face value and just leave it at that?

 

[Moar]

What did you think the answer to that question was going to imply? You were hardcore rolefishing there.

No, I was reaction fishing. I got lots of ractions which can be analyzed now and later. I didn't get an answer from Leo though.

 

[FredOfErik]

What I really react to is CG not even mentioning the mason possibility.

Why would CG mention the mason possibility? It would be pure speculation and not in anyway helpful to town.

A town and mason Leo would never have made the "get off his back" statement with just one vote (mine) on him.

And I am looking at those voting for me as well. You seem to hop on a thing there. Not realizing that Leo or any mason would not ever have tried to save a mason buddy so early.

But two scum buddies would? Noone besides you are discussing that Leo and Laarz might be masons. Your argument is weak at best.

 

[korialstraz]

Well this has certainly been interesting so far. Unfortunately I need some sleep. Good night everyone! =)

 

[FredOfErik]

No, I was reaction fishing. I got lots of ractions which can be analyzed now and later.

I'm just gonna copy paste my answer to cakes from when he claimed the same thing about a comment earlier.

this can be said about every damn post that gets even a mildly negative respond on D1.

 

[Moar]

Why would CG mention the mason possibility? It would be pure speculation and not in anyway helpful to town.




But two scum buddies would? Noone besides you are discussing that Leo and Laarz might be masons. Your argument is weak at best.

No, I am not discussing if they are mason buddys. I am discussing why CG didn't not mention that as a possibility and just painted Leo scum. In the process of that I provided reasons for why i think Leo wouldn't have acted like she did as a mason ( i still want to hear Leo's explanation about "know" and "feel" though).

 

[FredOfErik]

No, I am not discussing if they are mason buddys. I am discussing why CG didn't not mention that as a possibility and just painted Leo scum.

I feel like you are not reading my posts.

 

[pharphis]

Oh please! I give up on getting information from Leo. A town and mason Leo would never have made the "get off his back" statement with just one vote (mine) on him. Well, that's what I think anyway. I still want to know why she first says "know" then "feel". What I really react to is CG not even mentioning the mason possibility.

And I am looking at those voting for me as well. You seem to hop on a thing there. Not realizing that Leo or any mason would not ever have tried to save a mason buddy so early.

No, I am not discussing if they are mason buddys. I am discussing why CG didn't not mention that as a possibility and just painted Leo scum. In the process of that I provided reasons for why i think Leo wouldn't have acted like she did as a mason ( i still want to hear Leo's explanation about "know" and "feel" though).

i'm with FoE on this.

You find CG scummy because he didn't mention the possibility of them being masons, and then you also say "oh please" they can't be masons because it would be crazy for them to reveal that info this early.
Why would CG then have to even include that possibility if there's no way masons would reveal that info so early?

 

[Moar]

"But two scum buddies would? Noone besides you are discussing that Leo and Laarz might be masons. Your argument is weak at best.2

"No, I am not discussing if they are mason buddys. I am discussing why CG didn't not mention that as a possibility and just painted Leo scum. In the process of that I provided reasons for why i think Leo wouldn't have acted like she did as a mason ( i still want to hear Leo's explanation about "know" and "feel" though)."

First yours, second mine. How is that not answering your posts?

 

[Moar]

i'm with FoE on this.

You find CG scummy because he didn't mention the possibility of them being masons, and then you also say "oh please" they can't be masons because it would be crazy for them to reveal that info this early.
Why would CG then have to even include that possibility if there's no way masons would reveal that info so early?

I at least include the thought about masons while he didn't. Yes, I think they wouldn't and shouldn't defend so early. But at least I think about the possibility. CG didn't. He outright claimed Leo to be scum.