The Mim Report:
Let's look at some of Moar's 18 posts....
I've said that I wasn't that sure that Jaago was mafia any longer (if Nikon was, he can't).
There are interesting things shown about Thyiads voting habbits. It indeed looks like she vas trying to protect at least Sint. If Sint was mafia, then I think we need to lynch Thyiad as well.
So I'll go for having a lynching rather than another missed opportunity (spelling? it's before my first cup of coffee).
Unvote: Jaago
Vote: Thyiad
Her suspicion of Jaago was dependent on her suspicion of Nikon. Now she's saying nikon was mafia, so jaago must therefore be town, and she can switch her vote to the main lynch candidate.
I'll stick with my earlier suspicions, although they seem to be slightly flawed now and Nikon and Jaago can't both be mafia. If Nikon was indeed mafia, then Jaago shouldn't be because of his voting. So if Nikon was innocent, then Jaago is mafia. I'll go with that for now.
Vote: Jaago
Whatever happened to the possibilities that both can be mafia or none can be mafia? Instead of looking for additional information, she takes the safe route and decides we should lynch both, just to be sure, and spot the mafia a townie in the process.
Yes, and I am not mafia. Consider the matter again please.
Matter reconsidered.
I'm quite tired of being accused when there is nothing I could be accused for. I don't get where I should have slipped. To me it looks like there are a few people that jumped on me right from the start without much reasoning.
I haven't had much time to follow the thread, but what I read confuses me. There are some good thoughts out there and I have changed my opinion of some people a bit. I don't think Goltar is mafia now.
What stands out to me is that Lord Nikon and Jaago jumped on me without good reasons and try to get a bandwagon started. Looks like they will succed this time as well. Make of it what you will. :smiley:
Vote: Lord Nikon
Somehow this is different from the time Nikon and I tried to vote her? I'm already too prominent for her to need to mention? Setting up a lynching queue most likely.
Jaago, you should read my posts (your quotes) again more carefully.
I wanted to lynch somebody on the first day, but at the time of my post it was too early to pick a player. There is just not enough information that early. The 2nd post is from when day was nearing its end and more people had posted. I chose the person from the no-lynchers that was looking the most suspicious to me and shortlisted the others.
And what's that about playing nethack? That sounds rather random. :smiley:
Now, I must admit that I am really confused by the VI business. I was thinking that RV was the VI, but then it came up that he planned to act like the VI from before when the roles were decided. He could still be it though, but at the moment anybody could be the VI.
Let's see... Faking concern for townies and insisting there's not enough information to make a vote, then votes for a no-lyncher. Probably in the mafia playbook, right next to the First Rule: Lie. Concern for townies isn't so bad. It's when you wait for information from other sources so you can borrow their reasons that it looks less than innocent. Mafia don't lynch themselves...
Note to self: Spell it out next time.
Yes, of course I quoted him because I found his statement suspicious. And I still find it and him suspicious. Ain't going to change my opinion so easily. :smiley:
Apparently you can when it comes to Thyiad.
Ho hum...there my primary suspect for mafia got killed by said mafia.
RIP Drixx
I'm still suspicious of Lord Nikon and goltar for the same reasons as last time, but I lost some of my confidence after seeing how wrong I was with Drixx. I'll have to read some more and think some more before pointing my finger at someone.
Time to play some nethack and ponder, methinks.
Beginning to argue that it couldn't be her since she 'wouldn''t kill her primary suspect, and draw attention to herself. Seems odd when no one else mentioned her in relation to the Drixx kill.
Now that I have read the thread again, I agree that we should not pass on the chance to lynch. The problem is just to know who to lynch. There's definitely not enough information available to make a qualified decission.
Right now the risk of picking someone innocent is too high for my taste.
Hmm...I'm off to work now. I hope I can read the forums there, haven't tried it yet.
Or is it the prospect of getting associated with a mislynch that is too high for your tastes. "Definitely not enough information" - (translation) don't vote, just let the mafia kill off players until it's too late to stop them. We had enough information to base a day 1 vote on (we did as soon as the first post was made).
Her slip-up is that she said she suspected nikon
again on day 2, when on day 1 she really disagreed about the no-lynch policy some townies were wrongly advocating with nikon...
Let's lynch Moar mafia.
