Is it worth it?

GameOver

Member
Is it worth it?

I found a 4 soc eth scarab husk with 688 defence is it worth putting Stone in it for my Defencive merc? and about how much def will it will gain when stone is in?

and whats the def of an eth sacred armor? :scratch:
 
RTB said:
900 - 1350

Ethereal items get a 50% bonus, so for ethereal sacred armor it's (487-600)*1.5 = 730-900.
 
GameOver said:
I found a 4 soc eth scarab husk with 688 defence is it worth putting Stone in it for my Defencive merc? and about how much def will it will gain when stone is in?

and whats the def of an eth sacred armor? :scratch:

No !
Thats pretty low defense for an eth armour. Mercs have decent strength so you do not need to use a low strength armour. Look for armours up to Lacquered Plate (strength req 166). You should not consider using such expensive runes without at least 800 defense. It's ideal to get superior eth armour too.

Look for unsocketed eth armours, and use either the cube recipe (which is very cheap) but gives you random number of sockets (getting 3 or 4 is what you want) or Larzuk to guarantee 4 sockets.

I have an eth superior Kraken defense 848 I have not used for stone because I think the defense is not high enough.
 
sorcyone said:
No !
Thats pretty low defense for an eth armour. Mercs have decent strength so you do not need to use a low strength armour. Look for armours up to Lacquered Plate (strength req 166). You should not consider using such expensive runes without at least 800 defense. It's ideal to get superior eth armour too.

Look for unsocketed eth armours, and use either the cube recipe (which is very cheap) but gives you random number of sockets (getting 3 or 4 is what you want) or Larzuk to guarantee 4 sockets.

I have an eth superior Kraken defense 848 I have not used for stone because I think the defense is not high enough.

lol i think the eth armor is worth more than the runes :flip:
 
krischan said:
Ethereal items get a 50% bonus, so for ethereal sacred armor it's (487-600)*1.5 = 730-900.
Doh. Thanks for correcting such an obvious mistake. :bonk:
 
Back
Top