dual wielding flame bellow

[Paercival]

dual wielding flame bellow

Would a barbarian dual wielding perfect flame bellows have level 42 inferno? (18+18 +3 +3) If so... would that be lots of fun to try to use? (Is inferno bugged that it doesn't work? That would be sad)

 

[Arkardo]

Re: dual wielding flame bellow

Yes, it would be level 42. However, it's useless, because the damage simply won't be enough. Not even a dedicated Sorceress will be effective with this skill.

Note that the actual damage is only half of the listed damage. Or so I heard.

 

[Stevieb]

Re: dual wielding flame bellow

you also need to take into acount the mana costs. you need alot of increase % and also insight on your merc it really wouldnt be worth it.

Fun, very much so. Worth it, not so much.

 

[lumpor]

Re: dual wielding flame bellow

I made a thread about this a long time ago (couple of months). You can search

 

[omgwtfbbqpwned]

Re: dual wielding flame bellow

Cool sword.

Cool animation (Barbarians have a different Inferno animation than Sorceress).

Sucky damage.

Same goes with Frostwind.

God I wish they'd release a patch 1.13 and fix all these useless things they put in the game.

 

[lumpor]

Re: dual wielding flame bellow

Yeahm like all useless unsynergized ctc, like the one on flamebellow, stormspire, botd, etc that are just for looks

 

[Kordova]

Re: dual wielding flame bellow

maybe have them at sick lvl like 50's and 60's

 

[lumpor]

Re: dual wielding flame bellow

But if you WOULD synergize them in that case, they'd be a btit overpowered

 

[San]

Re: dual wielding flame bellow

Only with sorceresses, the bonus from Flamebellow is limited to +3, just like the war cry skills on cta are limited for barbs.

 

[Kordova]

Re: dual wielding flame bellow

yes thats well known.

i still think even with syn. flambellow build will ever be worth poop on a stick