Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

[boogyman19946]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Ok, here's my results after scanning through the posting history thus far.

Starting with Noodle.

The fact he doesn't post much worries me. Considering day 1, I've counted a total of 6 posts, most of which are short and don't offer any form of insight.

I will say that I assume Valhouros is clean. He broke the code of flubby's post restriction, and making more information public to the town is never in scum's best interest.

I find that a little insignificant (at least as far as confirming townies). It was nice to understand flubby (don't worry flub, I read your posts !) but on day 1, only so much can be discussed and analyzed, alas, it is the perfect time for mafia to be helpful and earn some brownie points with the town.

I'd be willing to throw a vote on coju, if there was some momentum. Just seems to be a bit reckless, which worries me.

Oh... you'd happily throw yourself on a bandwagon...

[3 posts later]
OK, Drixx.

vote: coju

but it worries you does it? Hmmm....

So day 1 wasn't the best we've seen anyway. Fine. Let's move on to day 2

Best day opening story ever?

Best filler post ever?

Still trying to make sense of things, kestegs. I agree with others that Drixx has verged on contradicting himself, so I wouldn't be against a lynch there. Ankeli I find difficult to take real seriously in these games, as he's basically a rabid dog. He'll target anyone he sees, for no apparent reason.

Wasn't it Ankeli who poked zemaj and got him on the skewer in the first place?

I would caution against locking a lynch too soon - we have plenty of time to play with, and locking a lynch prematurely limits our flexibility to change if zemaj or whoever the target is comes in with a seemingly valid explanation, or if someone else makes a gaffe and inadvertently drops evidence that he / she is scum.

Or maybe you were still trying to save him, albeit in a subtle manner.

I'm going to be in and out of meetings all day, so I'll cast my vote now. I feel there have been enough opportunities for zemaj to defend himself.

vote: zemaj

Yay, townie points!

Day 2 was some shady business if ya ask me.

And then, on Day 3, Uraj apparently tries to frame Noodle for not voting against Zemaj, which he revokes by saying he obviously did (i don't feel like looking up the posts, look them up in the search). Mission accomplished.

Now, I see Noodle is at least attempting to make his posts more content, but for the time being

Vote: Noodle

I don't have much time to traverse the rest of folks on my list so this is all I post for now (I figure the sooner the better). If anyone finds discrepancies in my post, I'll gladly hear them. For now, that's where I stand.

 

[Gwaihir]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Heading out to diner for the night, and I think I need to

Vote: flubbucket

That self vote sits bad with me. Not sure if I can make it back before the end of the day.

 

[Feysal]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

None of your refutations makes any sense. The only real piece of evidence you have is Kal's "power role" claim, and since he is not claiming a particular power role no one is counter claiming him to out him as mafia. So a vague mention that kal knows your identity is not sufficient to remove blame from you. Clearly others here agree.

Now you speak for yourself! An investigation by another player should be more than enough reason to drop or suspend suspicion on someone. Particularly since we are still so early in game. If the nice Mr Dricks had been up to no good with Mr Choral-Stewart, don't you think we'd have found out soon enough?

I'm not going to back down on what I thought was an obvious mafia player because one person makes an unsubstantiated claim. Claims like that need to be verified, as yours now has.

Oh no no no, that is so not how it works. You don't need to have claims verified, not immediately. You can choose to trust them for the time being, and if the claim is true, you are going to know when the villains are forced to kill one of the claimants. By pushing poor Mr Dricks to suicide you have only done a favor to the criminals.

Oh, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think this cleared Mr Choral-Stewart in any way. He said that he knew who Mr Dricks truly was, but he never said his name before Mr Dricks died. Not that I don't trust him mind you, he seems so well groomed and polite, just saying.

Now you... what exactly do you do around here? What did you say your name was, Arzini? Sounds like one of them gigolos to me.

Vote Asrrin

I'm still not thinking Sathoris :nod:

Why not? He seemed all too friendly with Mr Jemage, and foolishness is not really any defense when you have a history of similar stubborn foolishness as a villain.

 

[Kestegs]

Two mis-typed votes in a row... good work :thumbup:

 

[flubbucket1]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Corax is in the cross-hairs, for his weird voting behavoir day 1, and lurkyness.

Flubb is being voted for because he said "I'm town" before placing his vote on himself. He has self-voted him self before too during D2 (#564). I'm not sure why he doesn't just hold his vote on nobody rather than on himself.

I could lynch ethier one of them as neither are being a major help to the town. Although I'm more inclinded towards Flubb now, the more I think about it, the more I think he's self vote has some underlying misdirection under it. Espically as he's done it twice.

Unvote <------------------------- I think something goes here.

Vote: Flubbucket

Gwaihir your vote isn't bolded

 

[Feysal]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Oh silly me, it appears my vote was invalid. No matter, it is too late to get the numbers we need on Mr Arzini anyway.

Vote: corax

Maybe we can get lucky with a lurker target. It is certainly better than voting Mr Bucket though, who seems willing to become a sacrificial lamb. Who ever saw a villain do that? I never have.

 

[Uraj]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Now you speak for yourself! An investigation by another player should be more than enough reason to drop or suspend suspicion on someone. Particularly since we are still so early in game. If the nice Mr Dricks had been up to no good with Mr Choral-Stewart, don't you think we'd have found out soon enough?



Oh no no no, that is so not how it works. You don't need to have claims verified, not immediately. You can choose to trust them for the time being, and if the claim is true, you are going to know when the villains are forced to kill one of the claimants. By pushing poor Mr Dricks to suicide you have only done a favor to the criminals.

Oh, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think this cleared Mr Choral-Stewart in any way. He said that he knew who Mr Dricks truly was, but he never said his name before Mr Dricks died. Not that I don't trust him mind you, he seems so well groomed and polite, just saying.

Now you... what exactly do you do around here? What did you say your name was, Arzini? Sounds like one of them gigolos to me.

Vote Asrrin



Why not? He seemed all too friendly with Mr Jemage, and foolishness is not really any defense when you have a history of similar stubborn foolishness as a villain.

Corax is in the cross-hairs, for his weird voting behavoir day 1, and lurkyness.

Flubb is being voted for because he said "I'm town" before placing his vote on himself. He has self-voted him self before too during D2 (#564). I'm not sure why he doesn't just hold his vote on nobody rather than on himself.

I could lynch ethier one of them as neither are being a major help to the town. Although I'm more inclinded towards Flubb now, the more I think about it, the more I think he's self vote has some underlying misdirection under it. Espically as he's done it twice.

Unvote

Vote: Flubbucket

I neglected to post the correct vote format when I created the rules, as I edited an older version and removed all of the different examples of the wrong votes.

Correct format is:

Vote: pie
Unvote: pie


I am not however, making an issue with names being capitalized.
It's been edited into the rules.

Two mis-typed votes in a row... good work :thumbup:

 

[flubbucket1]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Okay if Feysal is going to make sure and fix his vote, I'm willing to do what's best for the town.

Unvote: flubbucket

Vote: corax

 

[Asrrin]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Well, it's not the greatest excuse to vote someone, but a lynch is better than a no lynch, especially if it's a lurker.

Vote: corax

 

[RlyehExiled]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Maybe we can get lucky with a lurker target. It is certainly better than voting Mr Bucket though, who seems willing to become a sacrificial lamb. Who ever saw a villain do that? I never have.

I'm not convinced it isn't some clever ploy. Surley such a gambit for scum could pay off and paint them town forever, for the very logic you just stated. People are voting for him because of his self vote, I even asked why he did it, and he hasn't shed any light on it.

@Flub: Why have you voted for yourself?

Unvote

Vote: Flubbucket

Also I'm sure I unvoted with just saying unvote before, but I'll go through the motions again just to make sure.

Unvote: Corax
Vote: Flubbucket

 

[Laarz]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Well Mrs Mallard, I dont know why people think you are senile, your mind seems sharp to me. I will have a cup of tea and

Vote: corax

 

[flubbucket1]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

I voted for myself because Goryani posted what appeared to be a sound argument. After the Drixx debacle the town was in disarray and we needed to focus. I had hoped people would read it (Goryani’s post) and get motivated to vote on a singular person. As has been stated ad nauseum, any lynch is better than no lynch. My self-vote was an attempt to start a train. ‘Nuff said

 

[Kestegs]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

I'm not convinced it isn't some clever ploy. Surley such a gambit for scum could pay off and paint them town forever, for the very logic you just stated. People are voting for him because of his self vote, I even asked why he did it, and he hasn't shed any light on it.

@Flub: Why have you voted for yourself?



Also I'm sure I unvoted with just saying unvote before, but I'll go through the motions again just to make sure.

Unvote: Corax
Vote: Flubbucket

He's high on my scum list for tomorrow, but I don't trust a lynch on him today. I am envisioning some kind of time frame for him to get lynched, like by d3. I have no basis for that, but I just don't feel right about doing what he wants.

 

[Caluin Graye]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Lurkers hurt the town, and I'm all for lynching anyone hurting the town. I still got my good eye on you, flubby.

Unvote: flubbucket

Vote: corax

 

[flubbucket1]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Have you counted the lurkers lately??

 

[boogyman19946]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

If corax is going to get lynched, I'll go off on the tangent possibility to save him, that he is most definitely pro-town and related to my role. I'm not going to role claim, but I'm just giving a heads up on what I know in good will to save a townie.

 

[Goryani]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Yay for bureaucracy. Filing deadline is the 17th. I got to eat dinner and read!

Specific questions for korialstraz:

There were a number of questions I had. Key point was had. When korial mentioned knowing Drixx's specific role name, most questions were answered or made irrelevant. Are there questions? Sure, but I don't think those answers will cause korial to change opinion of Drixx. The next answer to a question I never asked came when Drixx reminded korial about reading the PM to make sure naming names was legal. If there were only so many roles in which korial could know Drixx's role, there are even fewer roles in which Drixx can remind korial about what's in korial's mod provided info. There was a clear relationship between the two. Questioning korial wasn't going to give any additional insight to Drixx's alignment unless they were both lying, in which case I wouldn't know how to disprove either case based on the info I had available to me.

Relationship becomes an interesting word now that Drixx turned out to be Jimmy Palmer. More questions arise: korial, were you lovers with Drixx?

 

[boogyman19946]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Oh updated vote count (provided I didn't make a mistake as I was trying to do it quickly)

Sathoris: 1
Malevolent: 1
Noodle: 1
corax: 9
Asrrin: 2
flubbucket: 4

 

[flubbucket1]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

I believe Malevolent was unvoted

 

[korialstraz]

Re: Witch Hunt: The NCIS Haloween Forum Mafia Thread

Relationship becomes an interesting word now that Drixx turned out to be Jimmy Palmer. More questions arise: korial, were you lovers with Drixx?

No not really, but we did have a bond if you can call it that.

Sorry if it's not as specific as you'd hoped, but you seem to have some pretty good deduction skills.

Also it looks like the only reasonable lynch candidate is corax. However considering boogy's post, I feel uneasy lynching him. Although I'm not surprised to see another connection show up, considering the roles/connections people in the NCIS series have.

Unvote: Asrrin
Vote: corax

I'll try and get back on a last time before the day ends.