Election 2020

Pyrotechnician

Active member
May 11, 2020
525
123
43
Pennsylvania
No its not over, it just proves that our system is broken beyond repair. Representatives that the people supposedly "elected" are now signing on to a lawsuit essentially saying they reject what the people voted for due to some unknown element of fraud. Last time I checked this sounds more like treason to me, but what do I know, I'm just a stupid liberal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noodle
Mar 14, 2020
733
197
43
"These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long."

D. Trump


This man is insane.
 
Mar 14, 2020
733
197
43
3 of Hair Twitler's tweets have been removed and his account has been locked for 12 hours after he removes the tweets. If he doesn't, the account will remain locked.

WTF took so long?
 

Glurin

Active member
Jan 6, 2021
147
75
28
Here
Meanwhile, MSNBC is casually discussing using drone strikes against Trump supporters and lockdown protesters. And on The View this morning, they just took that crazy conservative Van Jones to the woodshed for having the audacity to acknowledge Trump did do some good things and for taking a "smiling photograph" of him with Candace Owens.

HELLO!!!!! WTF is it going to take for people to wake up and realize how wildly out of control the influencers of the left wing in this country has become? They are talking about killing people for the crime of having a different political opinion now and not in a joking kind of way. This has to stop.
 
Mar 14, 2020
733
197
43
Sounded more like a roundabout way of asking how Mitch can support killing terrorists with drone strikes but he won't vote to impeach someone that he himself says incited an insurrection. It was poorly phrased but she didn't say we should use drones to kill Trump supporters.
 

zemaj

Active member
Mar 17, 2020
233
177
43
Earth
So you think someone has to blatantly say "kill the people we disagree with" verbatim? The direct implication isn't enough? Yet Trump never directly said "go storm the Capitol" and you say that he incited an insurrection. Do you not see the flaw in that logic? Implications are enough to condemn one person, but not another?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitsufunk