Zombies invade Atlantis. Stargate zombie Mafia game.

You make the claim that asking for clarification is a scum move but I don't understand why that would be so. Your statements are suspect and warrant investigation. I don't know if your version of the truth is real or if you are trying to create a perspective in the group which supports you and your cohorts. In any case, I find it very off-putting that you would be so defensive about the unclear posts you've been making that you would vote for a lynch against me in response to me asking for clarification.

You didn't ask for clarification. You asked if I gained new abilities.
 
CG is just bringing obfuscation to the game

If you're going to lynch me, lynch me because of this. I wasn't expecting to survive last night, so I was intentionally trying to stir the pot to see what happens. Lynching me because of some perceived slip that was an honest mistake is just silly, and reeks of scum trying to get an easy lynch on a townie.

I am headed out to take my wife to see Rod Stewart tonight (delayed anniversary dinner+concert)

I am so sorry for your loss.

If for some reason CG decides to be helpful to the town and clear things up instead of kicking up clouds of confusion and OMGUSing anyone who questions him, then it may be a good idea to evaluate whatever claim he comes up with that could possibly match all the hinting and innuendo he's put up, but I suspect he's going to try and keep making cryptic statements until he gets someone else to draw attention off of himself.

There's nothing left to my claim. I've already laid out all the cards.
 
You didn't ask for clarification. You asked if I gained new abilities.

I encourage anyone to actually go back and look at the posts from earlier today and see the extent to which you're blowing my question of proportion. You said you had benefits beyond normal doc protection and I asked a lore question about if that could mean something about a symbiote (in that we've been talking all game about the potential connection between zombies and symbiotes and how they could play a role in the game) and asked what it means to get extra benefits. I asked did you get powers or something because I wanted clarification on the claim that you had extra benefits.

At the time, you facetiously replied "Wouldn't you like to know" and it was only after people started looking suspiciously at you that you then tried to turn against me. Why the shift? Seems like you just scrambled to point the finger at anybody as quickly as possible.

Also today I asked Numbers to provide clarification about the mistakes he made when he had trouble posting from his phone. Is that suspicious? CG, you're trying really hard to present a questionable account of things and I encourage everyone to read through the old posts and see what really happened.
 
Okay, that kinda clears it up. I don't really see it myself, but if Noodle were to return to play that would change things.

And if that happens who's to say we won't be up poop creek without a paddle?

0-100%, what do you think the odds are that Noodle is coming back?

If you're going to lynch me, lynch me because of this. I wasn't expecting to survive last night, so I was intentionally trying to stir the pot to see what happens. Lynching me because of some perceived slip that was an honest mistake is just silly, and reeks of scum trying to get an easy lynch on a townie.

The only thing I want to say is from my perspective, you were trying to get killed. Not sure what that means, but that's what your posts yesterday felt like.

And what if it was a slip? How silly would it seem if we didn't act on it?
 
Because you needed the doc save or is there another reason?

I was going to die one way or another last night, as my injuries get more severe as the game goes on. I figured if I could eat a night kill, at least death wouldn't be meaningless.
 
I was going to die one way or another last night, as my injuries get more severe as the game goes on. I figured if I could eat a night kill, at least death wouldn't be meaningless.

I don't think you've explained why you are injured have you?
 
Yes, you said that before. Sorry. Tired tonight. I don't know anything about Stargate except they there is slot machin with that theamed game in the casino we visit once a year on holidays.
 
I don't see Silas as a bad charater after having read the wiki. I will not vote for CG today.
 
Laarz was following along with the misguided train of thought that you were trying to guide everyone along. Now that people have noticed you're acting strangely and either lying or being purposefully vague you've changed your tactics a bit and provided more information. My question was, why have you been putting out these mysterious statements and what trap are you trying to set?

You say that you're trying to manipulate scum into making wrong moves but it seems instead that you're just trying to find anybody to pin attention on if suspicion starts to build against one of your partners or, as we just saw, if suspicion starts to build against you. You only voted against me once people started to feel your behaviour was too damning to go unnoticed. Further, you're trying really hard to convince people of things and to get people to talk about the topics you want and I don't know why. I feel that all of this is a pretty clear justification for my curiosity. I wasn't accusatory in any of my posts, I objectively asked for more information.

You make the claim that asking for clarification is a scum move but I don't understand why that would be so. Your statements are suspect and warrant investigation. I don't know if your version of the truth is real or if you are trying to create a perspective in the group which supports you and your cohorts. In any case, I find it very off-putting that you would be so defensive about the unclear posts you've been making that you would vote for a lynch against me in response to me asking for clarification.

Tell you what Triple A, don't try to put your idea of whats happening and pin it to what i'm doing. k?
 
CG isn't being transparent enough with his role even after he's accomplished all of what he was hoping to do (from my understanding).

His name is Siler...ok. Moar you aren't going to vote for him this entire day phase because of his name? But he's a character who gets injured all the time in a game with zombies where if he is anti-town he easily could have pulled the name from someone else no?

I also feel like we could learn something from kestegs by CG's flip. I personally think destroying the stick should earn 0 town points. There are pros and cons to both sides.

In fact I would be willing to bet kestegs destroying the stick is more likely to be scum than town. He doesn't want to make a connection with anyone this late in the game. On top of that, most of this group seems to think there are two mafia groups. What are the odds of him giving it to the other group vs town? Why would he risk that?

That and a strong defense of CG and I'd be willing to see either of them go.

I am actually leaning more towards unvoting CG and voting kestegs because of the voting stick, but CG isn't forthcoming enough with his "I get injured all the time so get over it" attitude towards the game. Call it fishing if you want, I call it give me a reason to unvote cause everytime I want to I have an "eehhhhh" moment where I can't justify removing it as much as I can keeping it.
 
CG isn't being transparent enough with his role even after he's accomplished all of what he was hoping to do (from my understanding).

The only thing you don't know is the exact mechanic of how I get injured or how many injuries I can have before dying. Why does a townie need to know these things? How does knowing how to make me die faster help the town at all?
 
PurePremium
Estimated market value
Low
High