wickedswami
New member
- Jul 11, 2008
- 1,573
- 0
- 0
Re: Apocalypse Now: Forum Mafia for the dystopian future!
who's jaques?
no idea what you're talking about here (sry if this was some OT stuff and i'm bringing it up again)
nothing really fishy yet, this is where it starts for me:
The second sounds like mafia wants to frame someone who was agressive towards BoD in day 1. It's hard to explain this really, it just sounds like that to me.
also, the last sentence seems to be only there to sound careless, though if he really was careless, he wouldn't feel the need to place that sentence there.
really bad explanation imo. Again the '/shrug' being all 'careless'. Also the bluff, which I called before (I also just realised I already voted spudnik today, my previous vote was therefore unnecessary)
he seems to only agree with bad ash to sound more pro-town. He even mentions it himself...
that's about it I guess.
Your thoughts?
O.M.G it was gorny :O First Jaques, now I_Told_You...
Conspiracy! Hes an "other"!!!!!!
who's jaques?
no idea what you're talking about here (sry if this was some OT stuff and i'm bringing it up again)
stupid, joke-ish reasons to keep a vote on gorny...Im still standing with my vote of gorny, hes suspcious, kidnapped a duck, held it ransom, killed itm then threatened someone so he must of beat up ITY!
nothing really fishy yet, this is where it starts for me:
this tickled my funny bone twice. The first sentence sounds like he's mad that Ankeli slipped up and died so fast. Also the 'within our midst' sounds like Ankeli betrayed them, the other mafia (might be far fetched)Leo about the thing Ankeli said, he was being a prat nuff said, Glad you lynched that traitor within our midst.
Hmm... BoD Trader was beaten up.. Who wanted to lynch him the most I wonder?
The second sounds like mafia wants to frame someone who was agressive towards BoD in day 1. It's hard to explain this really, it just sounds like that to me.
as leo mentioned, "dwindling YOUR numbers"?leo, ankeli was a raider yes, but if he has said that to get us lynched, like Sabotage basically. Now you suspect us of being Infiltrators, which means you'll lynch us, dwindling your numbers making the mafia win. /Shrug what ever floats your boat
also, the last sentence seems to be only there to sound careless, though if he really was careless, he wouldn't feel the need to place that sentence there.
Now your pulling at straws leo. Im talking figuratively that you will go ahead and lynch one of us, therefore dwindling your numbers. For one we don't know whos Townie and whose raider.
Im speaking Directly to you about that, if I were to say in general it would be "ours"
/shrug go ahead and lynch me if you want to kill a townie 1/2 aint bad though is it
really bad explanation imo. Again the '/shrug' being all 'careless'. Also the bluff, which I called before (I also just realised I already voted spudnik today, my previous vote was therefore unnecessary)
Hmm what your saying makes sense... theres a lick of proof that KI is a baddy . thats if leo is legit, then proceeds to ignore what has been said to lock in KI but instead goes on to try to lynch me... now doesn't that say there in cahoots? I habe to agree with you bad ash on that, and in my opinion I believe this gives me a little bit of credibility of being pro-town
he seems to only agree with bad ash to sound more pro-town. He even mentions it himself...
that's about it I guess.
Your thoughts?